Mistical Highlands
by Harry Lichtman
This highpoint in the Icelandic Highlands is known for dense fog which can really hamper route finding, especially when the route is snow covered. Normally a trail would be visible along this stretch, but just miles of snow. Skiing would have been a better option. I used Chris Chamberlain's idea to re-process the finished file a second time, reducing the clarity all the way. I selectively erased portions of the mist and clouds on the original file to reveal the enhanced mist effect. I have thought of croping a little off each end to tighten it up, but the pano crop does work with the stretched out mountains so I am undecided. I posted the original processing below.
D810, 24-120, ISO 100, f8, 1/180 sec.
Comments
22 commentsVery beautiful! That fog and mist are magical. Processing looks good and I really like the softness provided by negitive clarity. As you mention, due to the stretched mountains, this image lends itself very well to a pano treatment. Perhaps you could crop slightly but I don't think you want to crowd the mountains and lose the expansiveness. If I were to crop, I think that I might take some off the right side. The left side has a lot of interesting elements and I would not want to place them any closer to the left side frame.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
This is stunningly gorgeous! I think the first words that came to my head were clean and pristine. Immaculate comes to mind as well. Just perfect everything... I love this. I have no nits or suggestions what so ever!
I do have a question about double processing. I'm going to have to remember, but I may send you or Chris and email at one point to understand how this is done. Can I assume LR? I guess I'll have to bone up on that.
Anyway, I can't tell you how much I love this image. Congrats!
Lon
Lon, I don't use Lightroom. I just process the RAW in Adobe Camera Raw and finish it up in CS6. So, the way I processed this image was to make the initial RAW processing which got it very near the final image. Normally I use a little bit of Clarity adjustment in the initial Camera RAW conversion to improve midtone contrast, as the unprocessed RAW is pretty flat despite the contrast in a scene (this one had bright white snow and very dark volcanic mnt. areas). I then save as a TIFF.
To double process, I re-open the TIFF file in ACR and then lowered the Clarity slider all the way which maximally reduced the contrast. I saved this version as Low CLarity. I then erased to those portions of the Low Clarity for the cloud/mist areas.
I could have also opened the original RAW file and just lowered the Clarity slider, saved under a new name, and then done the same layer / erase. The ACR is very powerful it seems, and most tonal/color/noise processing can be done here. Hope that clears up any confusion.
Albert Darmo
Canada
I'm also one of those that believes that cropping out the blue sky would improve this image. With that fog the subject is one of muted colors. The bright blue of the sky and some of the shadows goes contrary to the subject matter. I would crop out the sky and desaturate the blue shadows on the right mountain and the large shadow coming from the bottom left. But that's just me.
I really enjoy how you re-pocessed the image with reduced clarity as it really brings about a more mysterious and soothing mood to the image. I would not crop this image and leave as is. This way the mountains have more room to breath.
Beautiful image and beautiful work in the vision in processing this scene