Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Bear Creek Waterfall
‹ PreviousWeekly Challenge GalleryNext ›

Bear Creek Waterfall

by Mike Bonar

Gallery: Weekly ChallengePosted November 13, 200998 views4 comments
This shot was taken in overcast conditions with a Nikon D100 35-135 mm lens at f22 1.6 second exposure. I like to take this type of photo, however I am not sure if I am getting them technically correct. Any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for taking a look :wavey:

Comments

4 comments
Comment posted by Buck Ward on November 13, 2009 at 8:28 PM
Hi Mike.-
I'm no expert on waterfall photography (we don't have them where I live) but this looks like you pretty much nailed it. I especially like the way the water blur fans out at the bottom of the fall.

I would have expected that a shutter speed of about two seconds would be about right - you were real close to that at 1.6 seconds. If you're not quite satisfied with the milky-silky effect, try setting your camera to Tv (shutter speed priority) and bracket.
Registered on December 8, 2003, 96 Posts, 1917 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Bonar on November 13, 2009 at 9:13 PM
Buck,

Thanks for the tip I will give it a try next time.
I took a look at your portfolio, your photos are great!

Thanks
Registered on November 11, 2009, 25 Posts, 50 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Jones on November 13, 2009 at 9:45 PM
Mike,
I'm really enjoying the waterfalls in this WC, and yours is no exception. There is no "technically correct" formula for waterfalls -- just different interpretations and tastes. Some look better with longer exposures, and some with shorter. That's why Buck's advice is right on -- it gives you a chance to pick an interpretation that pleases you. This one looks great.
Registered on April 18, 2007, 953 Posts, 6435 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on November 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM
Exposure looks good to me. Comp-wise, i think there might be too much going on, especially on the rhs. And the man made wall is somewhat displeasing from a nature standpoint. What really interests me is the (natural) cascade in the bottom right. If you had either gotten in close or used the 135 mm end, i imagine a close up of that little spill would have blown this broader shot away.
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments