Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Tundra Triangles...
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Tundra Triangles...

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted December 17, 2009441 views25 comments
An "ancient" image (in digital years - it was shot back in 2004), and this one is for Lon - his comment about geometric patterns in another post last week, along with the snow and cold outside my office right now, made me think of this shot...

It's my experience that one of the most critical (and difficult) things to do in wildlife photography is to fall slightly out of awe (or love, I suppose) with the animals you are shooting and remember to treat them simply as photographic subjects. And of course, to remember that to portray ANY subject most effectively one has to apply basic compositional principles. For instance, when you're watching sparring polar bears, it's totally easy to get completely wound up in the action and, in some respects, relax your "photographer's eye". In this case, I had been freezing my butt off for a good twenty minutes (outside of the warmth of our tundra buggy) watching and photographing these bears sparring when I started to notice the interesting geometric patterns their bodies were forming while mock battling. Suddenly I had something "new" to watch for and, before long, the bears gave me - for a brief instant - this interesting series of triangles. Because I was watching for it and was ready to shoot, I managed to capture the instant. Interestingly, when I was reviewing my images on my laptop that evening, about half of my companions who were doing the "peeking-over-the-shoulder" thing instantly noticed the triangles and exclaimed "cool" (or something of the sort). Others who have seen this image over the years have often said they liked it, but didn't know why. When I show them similar images, but without the strong triangular shapes, they're usually less interested in them. Shapes, lines, and other compositional principles matter in ALL photography, regardless of the strength of subject matter. And this is true even if the viewer knows NOTHING about "composition" or why they like an image.

By the way - the background in this image is NOT "blown out" - I shot this in a blizzard and the background was absolutely featureless and very, very white!

Subject: Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) sparring
Location: Cape Churchill, MB, Canada
Camera: Nikon D2H
Lens: Nikon 200-400 mm f/4G ED-IF AF-S VR lens (@ 360mm) - supported on a beanbag. VR on and set to "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/500s at f5. ISO 200. +1.0 stop compensation from matrix metered exposure.
Crop: Minimal - this is about 85-90% of original capture (crop off sides only)

All the gory details behind this image (field notes, all camera settings and processing details, conservation, etc.) can be found at:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/mammals/bears/detail_34.html.

Cheers...thanks in advance for feedback on the image or commentary...

Brad

PS: I'll be around over the holiday season but may not have the time to post any more images until after Christmas - season's greetings and best wishes to all Fauna Gallery regulars (and to any guests...).

Comments

25 comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on December 17, 2009 at 3:40 PM
I'll make a more thorough comment later - but for now let me just recognize how well the +1 Exposure Comp. worked on this photo! :biggrin:
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on December 17, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Hey Luke,

And this was with the "old" matrix metering - less compensation needed with the newer cameras (as per our recent discussion).

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Roger Hayden on December 17, 2009 at 5:10 PM
Hey Brad,
Thanks for that little lesson in composition, which is far more important than we realize when we are beginners. During the past year or so, I have tried to do exactly what you recommend: move away from the "awe" that so easily trips the journalistic impulse/shutter, and approach the subject as part of an overall composition.
I employed this technique after a friend suggested I photograph ducks on ice, in flat light, last winter. The subjects weren't particularly interesting until I started looking for patterns as they moved about or I shifted my frame of reference. The shoot got much more fun and interesting at that point.
Registered on November 21, 2009, 41 Posts, 201 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on December 17, 2009 at 5:29 PM
:cool: Beautiful image Brad!!! Your commentary is enlightening, thank you!!!

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on December 17, 2009 at 5:57 PM
Great example, Brad!

I think it is noteworthy that there are the triangles and angles created by their bodies as the bears engage in play battle, but there are also those created by the photographer! Note, for instance, the negative space triangles created by the framing of the image, as in the very large white triangles in both the upper right and upper left corners of the frame. When one studies both the negative space and the bears themselves, it is possible to come up with lots of geometry, including triangle within triangle.

I am constantly working to remain conscious of the truth in your statement, "one of the most critical (and difficult) things to do in wildlife photography is to fall slightly out of awe...with the animals you are shooting and remember to treat them simply as photographic subjects." It is SO hard, and so important.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by JACK NEAL on December 17, 2009 at 6:02 PM
Soooo Goood! Thanks for the lesson. That is why I like this site. I learn[ I hope!?].

Jack
Registered on September 26, 2009, 131 Posts, 554 Comments
Comment posted by Cam Held on December 17, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Brad,
First of all, what an amazing image! Just spectacular! It was funny, just as I was reading about how viewers with little art background can pick out the images with the best comp, my sister walked in and started oohhing and aawwing over it! I guess you're right!
I know as a photographer I am always trying to look for geometry and comp (not always successfully!), but it amazes me how some "photographers" seem to lack that skill. In my AP art class at school I find that many students simply point and shoot at something that interests them, and they lack any composition at all. This is more problematic with digital cameras than film, because they end up shooting hundreds or thousands of these crappy images in a weekend! My teacher is always harping at me for not taking more photos, but I think less is more in this case!
Sorry, I got a bit off track there! :biggrin: Anyway, great photo, and thanks for the discussion topic! :toast:
Happy Holidays!

-Cam
Registered on November 12, 2009, 59 Posts, 398 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on December 17, 2009 at 8:00 PM
Hey Lon,

I KNEW you'd notice all the other geometric patterns here! The triangles formed by the subjects themselves are fairly obvious, but those created with the negative space (and I did crop to make them more obvious) may not have been caught by everyone else (without your keen eye and commentary pointing them out). Thanks!

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Pramod Viswanath on December 17, 2009 at 10:29 PM
I love it too Brad! Indeed you are right, it's awesome to looki out for such 'patterns' as simple compositional technique. It's always a great learning here on fauna forum when you write few words more than usual that helps people think as well as improve.
Registered on December 4, 2008, 60 Posts, 697 Comments
Comment posted by kiran khanzode on December 17, 2009 at 10:33 PM
Old is Gold, the image still shines ! Thx for the information, very useful. :toast:
Registered on February 21, 2009, 83 Posts, 428 Comments
Comment posted by john hansen on December 18, 2009 at 1:27 AM
it is a very cool shot with the forms the bears make. The background, or lack thereof, sets them off. great shot and reminder.
Registered on September 11, 2007, 95 Posts, 369 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on December 18, 2009 at 6:55 AM
What a fantastic graphic composition Brad! There are triangles everywhere; the obvious ones and the ones pointed out by Lon, but you can even extend 'seeing' triangles on the bear's head's, namely the open jaws and also the nose-eye-mouth corner triangles. The white BG and ground obviously sets the bears off nicely, which makes all these shapes come out better than they would with other elements in the frame.

Thanks once more for another educational commentary Brad. I am convinced that the regular Fauna gallery visitors appreciate these greatly and will benefit from them. Have a great Christmas!
:toast:
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on December 18, 2009 at 7:28 AM
Great action & wonderful expressions, very well framed too !
Whites in white simplify the frame, making it very-very effective.
Jagdeep Rajput :toast:
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Sally King on December 18, 2009 at 10:56 AM
Polar bears. How could anyone not like an image with polar bears, especially with that amazing interaction. I do love the almost perfect triangle the two bears form. I can see what you are saying about separating your love of a subject from determining whether an image of the subject is good or not. However, (and one of many reasons why are you are and will continue to be the professional photographer while I am not) I have no intention on working on my skills in this particular area at this time. I like to get excited at getting an image of a creature I have never seen before or a better (but not great shot) of a subject I have seen before. I know you do love your subjects and have just found a way to separate that love from an honest assessment of the art. Someday maybe I will too but right now I just want to drown myself in the exhileration of searching for new things and trying to capture them with the camera. When I am watching and photographing an amazing scene I don't want to get lost in the geometry of capturing a shot. I hope that my photography will improve (and to do that fully I may have to learn that separation) but right now for me it is as much about the chase as the capture. Hope that makes sense. I LOVE looking at your images and appreciate the deep thought you put into each image and the comments you post.
Registered on December 2, 2008, 416 Posts, 4450 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel & Loana on December 18, 2009 at 1:22 PM
Great shot! Thanks for the description. I like the way you organized your site a lot.

Regards

D&L
Registered on October 7, 2008, 166 Posts, 3044 Comments
Comment posted by Joe James on December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM
I'm always in AWE of your photos and this is no exception. The bonus is getting a great photography lesson with each post. Take care and happy Holidays!
Registered on November 20, 2009, 89 Posts, 808 Comments
Comment posted by mark cillo on December 18, 2009 at 6:32 PM
Agree the compositiopn makes this one quite dramatic! Awesome image! :wavey:
Registered on July 27, 2008, 143 Posts, 1483 Comments
Comment posted by Josh Anderson on December 18, 2009 at 9:13 PM
Amazing shot Brad.

~ja
Registered on June 2, 2005, 493 Posts, 2996 Comments
Comment posted by Jorne de Bruin on December 19, 2009 at 6:40 AM
Besides a great moment this image also has allt hose wonderfull geometric forms, very appealing image Brad! :toast: :wavey:
Registered on June 26, 2008, 178 Posts, 2136 Comments
Comment posted by Roman Kurywczak on December 19, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Hi Brad,
Very nicely handled and the interaction is great.I think all the triangular comps....even in the dead space, come together very nicely to create a very powerful image. I do believe succesful images have many of these patterns many times we just sometimes take them for granted or don't even realize them. In this image they are very clear to see.
Registered on November 20, 2009, 56 Posts, 748 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on December 20, 2009 at 2:11 AM
Wow, you were taking stunning images back in 2004 as well! Really useful discussion on compositions Brad, greatly appreciated. I also forgot to considered that matrix metering was getting "smarter" , I have blown out some white areas recently probably due to blind over compensation.
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Walters on December 20, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Great image and great lesson as well. Will have to try and focus on that while shooting!
Registered on October 30, 2005, 405 Posts, 3693 Comments
Comment posted by James Campbell on December 22, 2009 at 4:22 AM
Great shot, Brad.. and very interesting comments on composition - always worth keeping in mind :smile:

Cheers, James
Registered on January 12, 2009, 48 Posts, 377 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Willison on December 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM
Brad, I like your outlook on composition, and of course in this image the lens you used. Very impressive at f/5.
Registered on April 10, 2009, 292 Posts, 3967 Comments
Comment posted by Francesco Boccia on December 26, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Wonderful moment! Great job. :wink:
Registered on December 26, 2009, 3 Posts, 6 Comments