Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Sea Nettle
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Sea Nettle

by Clinton Bauder

Gallery: WildlifePosted December 19, 200913,170 views12 comments
This is a Sea Nettle (Chrysaora fuscescens) which is a common jelly in the Monterey area (and a favorite of aquarium goers there as well). This was shot drifting in Carmel Bay. It's cropped to about 60% of original pixels, partly because my buddy had deployed a surface marker buoy which is visible in one of the corners of the original shot. The buoy was to allow the boat keep track of us as we drifted with the jellies.

Digital cameras aren't supposed to do "God Beams" very well but I was very happy with this result and haven't seen too many film shots that are that much better. Other than cropping I haven't done too much to this shot. It was slightly over-exposed so I did some exposure and levels adjustments. Interestingly this image got a LOT better when I upgraded to Aperture 2. The old raw converter added lots of nasty purple artifacts at the edges of the light rays which (mostly) went away with the newer version. At some point I want to do some more comparisons with other raw converters.

If I had it to do over I'd probably shoot ISO 100 and open up slightly.

Nikon D200, Tokina 10-17 Fisheye Zoom at 17, Dual Sea and Sea YS350 strobes (with nearly dead batteries which probably didn't fire in this shot - hard to say for sure).
ISO 200, f18, 1/250, strobes at ???

Comments

12 comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on December 19, 2009 at 2:43 AM
Wow! This is radiant Clinton! I really like this and the way you captured those god beams is excellent. Processing looks perfect to me. :toast:
I am really enjoying your underwater images!

Can't you tell from the EXIF data whether your strobes fired or not?
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel & Loana on December 19, 2009 at 5:21 AM
THis is really nice. The beams work very well.

Congratulations.

D&L
Registered on October 7, 2008, 166 Posts, 3044 Comments
Comment posted by Roman Kurywczak on December 19, 2009 at 12:43 PM
Hey Clinton,
The backlighting/god rays are outstanding on this as is the comp! I really like the shadow play throug the body also as it adds another whole dimension......very nicely done!!!
Registered on November 20, 2009, 56 Posts, 748 Comments
Comment posted by Sally King on December 19, 2009 at 3:12 PM
I love how the light comes through the nettle. The colors are pleasant. Very intriguing image. I am very glad you are sharing these underwater images with us.
Registered on December 2, 2008, 416 Posts, 4450 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Olsen on December 19, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Awsome capture...love the whole photo!
:toast:
Registered on October 19, 2006, 306 Posts, 1571 Comments
Comment posted by Anand Narayanan on December 19, 2009 at 10:42 PM
fascinating creature and stellar light literally !
:toast:
Registered on October 25, 2009, 110 Posts, 835 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on December 20, 2009 at 1:49 AM
Love the colors and the interesting graphics, looks very "Space Odyssey-ish". I like the way you positioned the bright spot behind the Sea Nettle, but a slightly less centered comp might be a bit stronger. I would be a happy camper to have taken this, but I don't do scuba so hats off to you for getting wet.
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on December 20, 2009 at 8:50 AM
Hi Clinton,

Striking image and of a type rarely seen here in the Fauna Gallery. Besides the "god beams" (and I'm quite puzzled by your statement about how these are difficult to produce effectively with digital cameras) and the drama of the sea nettle itself, I quite like the "two tone" background, with the darker lower portion and the lighter upper portion. Overall the image works very well for me...

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Cam Held on December 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM
Clinton,
Wow!!! This is spectacular! The processing looks great (Aperture 2 is what I use too). Just one question, why are god beams harder to get on digital cameras? Thanks for sharing this amazing image!
-Cam
Registered on November 12, 2009, 59 Posts, 398 Comments
Comment posted by Clinton Bauder on December 20, 2009 at 10:11 AM
Basically the issue with sunball-shots on digital is that they tend to have a very harsh transition to "completely overexposed". Even though slide film probably has less dynamic range the clip at the point of the sunball where there is no longer any detail is very smooth and pleasing to the eye. With digital you get color (especially purple) artifacts, banding and and a much more sudden transition. Increasingly this is less of a worry. If you're shooting RAW with a D3s you'll probably get better results than film.

BTW - soon off to Colorado for the winter break. With luck I'll be able to post some more conventional fauna images from my parent's backyard in Salida. Hope the 80-400 is up to the task. Every time I go there I'm tempted to do something silly like buy a 200-400 or a 300 2.8 and 1.4x teleconverter. We'll see if my discipline holds up!

Happy Holidays!
Registered on December 8, 2009, 31 Posts, 231 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on December 20, 2009 at 3:15 PM
Everything looks good to my eye. I especially like the sense of texture on the jelly, all the while being able to see the light coming through it.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Walters on December 20, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Love the colors and the rays from the sun. Like how you can see the details inside the nettle.
Registered on October 30, 2005, 405 Posts, 3693 Comments