Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Mommy's Eagle
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Mommy's Eagle

by Katja Rosvall

Gallery: AvianPosted January 29, 2010109 views7 comments
My first Avian post, and actually, my first 'real' avian photo, so please don't thrash it, ok? :wink: The backlight was quite bad, so the picture is a bit dark; this is about as much as I could tweak it in PP.

It wasn't really my intention to go and shoot big predators with my brand new lens (which I got thanks to some advice from NPN'ers), but I got damned lucky. I had just ordered my lens when my Mother told me about this White-tailed Sea Eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) that had been visiting the harbour area this winter. So once I got the lens, Mom took me there (the area's closed to the public, but she works there as a crane driver). We didn't see the eagle (my usual luck, no surprise there), but ok then, I could try the zoom on the scenery. I was just putting up my tripod, when one of Mom's workmates appeared. Hearing what we were about, he pointed and said: "The eagle's over there!" We'd never have spotted it ourselves! So there you go, my first avian subject.

Despite the obvious lack of mm's and the backlight, I'd have been happy simply *seeing* the bird, as they're rare enough in the best of places.

Thank you for looking.

Olympus E-3
Zuiko 50-200 mm SWD + TC 1.4x @ 283 mm
1/1000 sec @f5.0
ISO 400
Dodgy tripod, no flash

PS. I'm a bit new to this zoom & TC business, so could someone please explain why the camera data says 283 mm, even though the theoretical maximum with this combination is 280? Surely there can't be such a thing as a free mm? :confused:

Comments

7 comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on January 29, 2010 at 6:44 PM
Hi Katja

Nice work finding the eagle, I'd have been very happy just to see the bird too, getting an image of it is a bonus.

I can't explain why the camera data says 283mm, perhaps some one else can.

I might have tried some positive EV compensation since the bird was backlit, some times even +1/4 to +1/3 can be an enormous help in the exposure.

This image shows this species huge bill, that is very impressively large!
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on January 29, 2010 at 6:59 PM
Welcome to the Avian Gallery, Katja. I recall some fine interchanges with you on the Macro Gallery. Maybe we can meet there again too when some photogenic bugs emerge from the now frozen ground around here! Looks like a really unusual bird for your posting here. Backlighting is tough to deal with, especially with no flash. Looks to me like you made the best of it! :toast:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by KC Choo on January 29, 2010 at 8:09 PM
Welcome to NPN! I can't explain the free mm either! But, when backlit, you can even go to +1EV or more at times.

That is one impressive Eagle!
Registered on November 15, 2004, 519 Posts, 8278 Comments
Comment posted by Jay Martin on January 29, 2010 at 10:51 PM
I'd love to see one of these guys - good job with the conditions and welcome to the avian gallery!
Registered on December 6, 2005, 200 Posts, 2209 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Dubois on January 30, 2010 at 11:47 AM
Welcome Katja :wavey: That's quite an eagle - nice catch. A little tweak on the exposure to brighten the eagle, either when you shot it or in post processing would help to bring out the detail.

Hope you become a regular here on Avian.
Registered on February 22, 2005, 129 Posts, 4739 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on January 30, 2010 at 3:00 PM
Congrats on finding this magnficent bird Katja, when shooting a dark bird against a light sky background you will often need to add 1 to 2 stops to your in camera metering to get the exposure correct on the bird. Check your histogram, what I try and do is get the sky as bright as possible (as far to the right in the histogram) without blowing it out. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Charlie VanTassel on January 31, 2010 at 9:12 PM
Actually... getting thrashed is what it's all about. It shows we care. :rolleyes: A cool bird....one I hope to see again (it's been a while). The angle is a bit steep, and of course it would be nice if you could find a nice mossy tree branch for him to sit on. Still, you're off to a great start just finding a subject like this. Just be careful not to get as obsessed as some people around here. :wink: :toast:
Registered on October 18, 2006, 644 Posts, 4801 Comments