Western Grebe
by Richard Ditch
Western Grebe ( Aechmophorus occidentalis)
Place: Water Ranch, Gilbert, AZ, USA
Date: March 21, 2010
Equipment: Nikon D200, Nikkor AF-S 300/2.8 & TC20E (2x), G1325, RRS BH-55, Sidekick
Exposure: ISO 400, aperture priority matrix metered, 1/640th @ f/10
Raw, PS CS3 on Mac G4, minimal cropping, minor cloning to clean up a few blemishes on the water surface
Another shot from last month's close encounter with a Western Grebe at the Gilbert Water Ranch. I rarely shoot this tight but the bird started out very close to shore.
Please view the larger version if possible before commenting. Honest critiques requested; all comments appreciated.
Comments
23 commentsNot the tiniest nit from me!
I notice you have the TC 2.0 on the 300 - this is tack sharp. When I try this combination, it is NOT tack sharp. My 300 + the 1.7 is great.
Any ideas why? (Other than the fact that you are 1000x more skilled than I...)
Maybe that i'm hand-holding ? But still, the VR should overcome that..
Sandy r
- Luke
- Sandy
I've relied on this lens combp since I bought both the 300/2.8 and the 2x together in 1998, and I rarely drop down to the 300 plus 1.4x, and even less often to just the bare 300. Probably every shot in my Gallery was taken with the 300 and 2x. I once convinced my friend Tom Webster that I'd epoxied the converter and lens together!
The 2x does reduce the overall sharpness, but the 300 alone is such an awesome lens that the results are still publication quality.
I shoot with a Gitzo 1325tripod at all times with this, and I use a Sidekick on a RRS ball head. I think that's a big help in maintaining quality. I usually keep the head/sidekick unlocked so I can follow the active birds; I hang on to the camera and provide a lot of dampening that way. I shoot in short bursts whenever possible to give more chance of getting a sharp image.
I can't say about hand holding and the benefits of VR - this is too heavy for an old guy like me, and none of my lenses has VR.
The best results come from working with closer subjects. I think part of the negative reputation for the 2x comes from unreasonable expectations - people think the added optical power will overcome distance, but I think that just gives more problems with atmospheric issues, magnified small camera movements, and focus that isn't quite on target.
I think its beautiful.
Peter
cheers
Rob
Congrats
D&L