Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Western Grebe
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Western Grebe

by Richard Ditch

Gallery: AvianPosted May 2, 2010130 views23 comments
Western Grebe ( Aechmophorus occidentalis)

Place: Water Ranch, Gilbert, AZ, USA
Date: March 21, 2010
Equipment: Nikon D200, Nikkor AF-S 300/2.8 & TC20E (2x), G1325, RRS BH-55, Sidekick
Exposure: ISO 400, aperture priority matrix metered, 1/640th @ f/10
Raw, PS CS3 on Mac G4, minimal cropping, minor cloning to clean up a few blemishes on the water surface

Another shot from last month's close encounter with a Western Grebe at the Gilbert Water Ranch. I rarely shoot this tight but the bird started out very close to shore.

Please view the larger version if possible before commenting. Honest critiques requested; all comments appreciated.

Comments

23 comments
Comment posted by Mitch Moraski on May 2, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Great capture Richard. Living here in the NE, we don't see these. I've always admired them. Tack sharp focus on the eye, and great BG. Nice soft, and simple. I like the wake as well. Reminds me of my loon shots. Way to go!!
Registered on August 3, 2008, 105 Posts, 590 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on May 2, 2010 at 3:24 PM
Excellent, Richard. Not nits from me.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on May 2, 2010 at 3:50 PM
Very nice. Eye is sharp and lovely. Like the water action. Detail in feathers well done.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Elwood on May 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Richard this image has great detail and your exposure was spot on!! I too like the wake in the water. Well done! :toast:
Registered on January 15, 2010, 101 Posts, 396 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on May 2, 2010 at 4:39 PM
Terrific exposure on this Grebe Richard. I love the eye, head angle, detail and direction of the light in this. Beautifully done! I don't think I have ever had a chance to get this close to any Grebe....so congratulations on that :toast:
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by David Chauvin on May 2, 2010 at 5:26 PM
Razor sharp and very nice lighting. My first impression (before reading your post) was that it was tight in the frame for my preference and I still wish for some breathing room. But still it's an excellent photograph as presented.
Registered on August 5, 2004, 1007 Posts, 5595 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Harbour on May 2, 2010 at 5:49 PM
Great light, excellent depth of field and the perfect head turn. Beautiful.
Registered on January 4, 2008, 113 Posts, 2416 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on May 2, 2010 at 6:42 PM
Another classy image from you Rich. Besides the pose of the bird and the excellent IQ I really like the glassy water and the resulting contrast from the wake. Does seem slightly tight to me though.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Walters on May 2, 2010 at 7:25 PM
Nice job on the exposure and great eye contact. Would like to see a little more room around the grebe.
Registered on October 30, 2005, 405 Posts, 3693 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on May 2, 2010 at 7:26 PM
Richards, gorgeous!
Not the tiniest nit from me!
I notice you have the TC 2.0 on the 300 - this is tack sharp. When I try this combination, it is NOT tack sharp. My 300 + the 1.7 is great.
Any ideas why? (Other than the fact that you are 1000x more skilled than I...)
Maybe that i'm hand-holding ? But still, the VR should overcome that..

Sandy r
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on May 2, 2010 at 8:07 PM
The light really illuminates the eye on this photo

- Luke
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on May 2, 2010 at 8:28 PM
Very nice in every way..I especially like the singular wake that surrounds the bird as it moves through the still waters :toast: :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on May 2, 2010 at 9:47 PM
I notice you have the TC 2.0 on the 300 - this is tack sharp. When I try this combination, it is NOT tack sharp. My 300 + the 1.7 is great.
Any ideas why? (Other than the fact that you are 1000x more skilled than I...)
Maybe that i'm hand-holding ? But still, the VR should overcome that..


- Sandy

I've relied on this lens combp since I bought both the 300/2.8 and the 2x together in 1998, and I rarely drop down to the 300 plus 1.4x, and even less often to just the bare 300. Probably every shot in my Gallery was taken with the 300 and 2x. I once convinced my friend Tom Webster that I'd epoxied the converter and lens together!

The 2x does reduce the overall sharpness, but the 300 alone is such an awesome lens that the results are still publication quality.

I shoot with a Gitzo 1325tripod at all times with this, and I use a Sidekick on a RRS ball head. I think that's a big help in maintaining quality. I usually keep the head/sidekick unlocked so I can follow the active birds; I hang on to the camera and provide a lot of dampening that way. I shoot in short bursts whenever possible to give more chance of getting a sharp image.

I can't say about hand holding and the benefits of VR - this is too heavy for an old guy like me, and none of my lenses has VR.

The best results come from working with closer subjects. I think part of the negative reputation for the 2x comes from unreasonable expectations - people think the added optical power will overcome distance, but I think that just gives more problems with atmospheric issues, magnified small camera movements, and focus that isn't quite on target.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Charlie VanTassel on May 2, 2010 at 11:07 PM
Excellent, Rich. We have some thousands here in our local lake...many with newborns. Great sharpness and exposure control, which isn't always easy with these birds. :toast:
Registered on October 18, 2006, 644 Posts, 4801 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on May 2, 2010 at 11:19 PM
I don't mind the tight crop Richard, a real beauty! :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Conway on May 3, 2010 at 12:32 AM
Hi Richard, I like seeing tighter comps sometimes as it really brings forward the details. This photo is a great example of that. It is so incredibly sharp and the eye just jumps off the screen. The still waters really add to that feel as nothing pulls your eye away.

I think its beautiful. :toast:

Peter
Registered on June 25, 2007, 347 Posts, 3913 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on May 3, 2010 at 7:41 AM
You've just squeezed him in Richard - like the detail and the bow wave against the glassy smooth water

cheers
Rob
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Gatlin on May 3, 2010 at 8:47 AM
wonderful light, detail, exposure. it is tighter than I'd prefer, but the tradeoff is the great detail you have.
Registered on March 21, 2009, 202 Posts, 4187 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on May 3, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Excellent detail on this grebe, the larger version was a pleasure to view.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel & Loana on May 3, 2010 at 4:29 PM
Very nice pose and wonderful colours!

Congrats

D&L
Registered on October 7, 2008, 166 Posts, 3044 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Twaddell on May 3, 2010 at 6:28 PM
Very nice, although a bit tight, as you already noted. The detail is outstanding. I always seem to blow out the eye in this species.
Registered on August 16, 2007, 199 Posts, 2132 Comments
Comment posted by KC Choo on May 4, 2010 at 12:54 AM
No problem with the tight crop - excellent!
Registered on November 15, 2004, 519 Posts, 8278 Comments
Comment posted by antino cervigni on May 4, 2010 at 8:04 AM
Excellent shot!!! Regards Antino
Registered on April 17, 2010, 70 Posts, 202 Comments