Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Time Companions
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Time Companions

by Lon Overacker

Gallery: LandscapePosted May 19, 2010355 views32 comments
Thanks so much for all the comments on the previous image. I really appreciate your thoughts. Some of you may recognize this image as I posted it's baby sister version a few months back. Yeah, the digi-snap version. Identical comps. The processing of the 4x5 is a little more contrasty. I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on this version.

Interesting too, and I don't know what this says, but the structure of this tree versus the one I just posted is almost identical. Only the backgrounds have been changed to protect their identity... :wink:

To the title. I got to looking at this trying to come up with a title and while this may be a little bit out there, I came up with this:

The oak leaf lives but for maybe six months. It then returns to the earth to nourish another generation of life. The oak tree in the same way, only surviving but for just a few hundred years; eventually fading away and returning to the soil with the leaf. Then there is the granite monolith. Standing the test of time, yet never able to overcome the effects of time. The wall may have stood for millions of years and perhaps millions more, but will eventually return to it's source just as the leaf and the tree. And with that, I see this all together at one moment, companions in time. Think of that in the human context..... I'm but a leaf.

Thanks for your comments.

Lon

same-o, same-o, 4x5....

Comments

32 comments
Comment posted by Roman Kurywczak on May 19, 2010 at 9:26 PM
Hey Lon,
Interesting comparison with plusses and minuses in both.....I like the tree shape/contrast slightly better in the little sister version but the color of the leaves and rock details is much nicer in this version. I do like the profound thought also behind the image just as much.!
Registered on November 20, 2009, 56 Posts, 748 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on May 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM
Hah! You keep taking pictures this fine, you will be more than a leaf! :biggrin:
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on May 19, 2010 at 9:29 PM
Looks good, Lon. Another fine tree image from the tree master.
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Rodney Dugmore on May 19, 2010 at 9:34 PM
Nice work Lon.
There is something about this that invites a closer look!
An altogether delightful study. I think the restrained palette
helps with this. My only nit is the top of the evergreen tree poking in from the bottom
its not major but still distracts a little.
Superb
Registered on January 3, 2004, 76 Posts, 1028 Comments
Comment posted by Michael VanBeber on May 19, 2010 at 9:41 PM
Beautiful image, Lon. I love the thoughts that went into the title. Makes one think!
Registered on February 27, 2009, 34 Posts, 183 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on May 19, 2010 at 9:50 PM
A leaf, Lon? No way. I prefer thinking of you as an adolescent oak tree. Now don't you feel younger already.

Digital or 4x5, it's a wonderful comp and good light.

It's neat to connect allow our photography to connect us to something larger.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Rappaport on May 19, 2010 at 9:52 PM
Once again a perfectly framed tree. Not so easy to do, but when accomplished creates a sense of strength and serenity. This one is a bit more straighforward in mood than the last, but I like it just as well.
Registered on September 9, 2009, 294 Posts, 2006 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on May 19, 2010 at 10:01 PM
Very nice ,Lon. This makes me feel like I need to see it in a large print. I also liked the baby sister one. Not sure I have a favorite, but this is really nice. I also liked the story with it. Good work.

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, Wi
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on May 19, 2010 at 10:03 PM
The detail is grand here Lon. I just love these kind of images. Beautiful work for sure, but your previous post is one of my favorites of yours. Not saying this is not good because it is really good and I love it. Just like the mood of the other a little better.

I love being inside trees like this..... if ya know what I mean...... and all your images like this take me there.

Also thinking about your comment of the oak tree, oak leaf, and the granite wall. Absolutely true.
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Dean Sauskojus on May 19, 2010 at 10:21 PM
Another nice one Lon. I would say this is your forte'. Well done. Maybe this is to much to ask, but how do you get such great separation between your tree shots and the background? What do you look for when you're out there?
Registered on September 29, 2009, 137 Posts, 2659 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Ewert on May 19, 2010 at 11:21 PM
This is beautiful, Lon. I thought it was you as soon as I saw it. Well done.
Registered on June 2, 2009, 103 Posts, 1500 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on May 19, 2010 at 11:47 PM
Thanks for the comments so far folks. I truly appreciate it.

Dean:
What do you look for when you're out there?

Yeah, probably too much for here... I've actually been tossing around a blog subject or even another article for NPN, but we'll see about that. The don't call me the Procrastinator for nothin' ya know.
But there are a few things I look for or at least I have in the back of my mind all the time - because I certainly don't seek out just trees, although it may seem like it.

1. Uniformity of background. Which doesn't mean a blank sky or a uniform color or something. The previous image had a chaotic background, but in a sense, it was uniform chaos. In other words the background was all about the same thing; whether it's light, color, patterns or form.
2. See like your lens. It's a bit different with large format because the only zooms that exist are your feet. I have 5 lenses and you end up learning or visualizing what each lens can cover.
3. I look to fill the frame with much of what I shoot. That differs from your typical wide angle landscape type vision.
4. Many times I avoid including the ground. Once you include the ground (or sky for that matter) you've changed a "tree" image in to a "landscape" image with trees in it.
5. Look for patterns, form, structure and balance. Easy to write that down. :wink:
6. Biggest cliche of all: Keep it simple, which includes the background.

I dunno, I've never really tried to categorize this and I'm sure there's more, but those are a few things that come to mind.

Thanks for asking and thanks for the comments.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Rudy Ruberti on May 19, 2010 at 11:55 PM
The dark branches stand out nicely against the gray rock. Another great image, Lon. I also like the detail and sharpness here.
Registered on October 28, 2008, 179 Posts, 1875 Comments
Comment posted by Dietrich Gloger on May 20, 2010 at 1:05 AM
As typical as it gets and as good as it gets Lon! There are a lot of elements that work well like the structure of the tree, and how the dark branches contrast with the background. Furthermore, the texture of the granite wall is a subject worth of being photographed alone. It therefor enhances the shot a lot. Finally the orange leaves work great with the blueish bg. Thanks also for sharing your considerations for composing these images.
Registered on January 26, 2007, 360 Posts, 9876 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Roane on May 20, 2010 at 1:18 AM
wonderfully graphic image - I like it alot, Lon
Registered on December 12, 2008, 213 Posts, 2226 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on May 20, 2010 at 1:46 AM
You're the reason why I stop whenever I see trees in front of rock faces. I move my head around to find great compositions, but so far I never was happy enough to take a shot. Images like this one keep my interest alive and make me continue my search. Thanks for this great shot and inspiration, Lon.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Jimmy Gekas on May 20, 2010 at 2:02 AM
I loved this then and still love it now! Although, I suspect that the 4x5 will win out :wink:
Registered on July 26, 2007, 244 Posts, 2807 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on May 20, 2010 at 8:26 AM
Absolutely superb, Lon. The blue'ish backdrop of granite gives it such a surreal look. This truly deserves to be printed large and displayed prominently.

Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Duval on May 20, 2010 at 8:34 AM
If that's the case I fell off the tree a long time ago. I remember the other tree image, other than being the same type of tree I can't see the similarity maybe I need to go back and look. The gallery section of the page is neat I got to see all of your recent tree posts that I unfortunately missed. Your passionate about trees your imagery conveys that. While I see the branch symmetry is similar this individual IMO appears larger and a bit older than it's sister, again it's just an opinion. To me the granite face in the background does imply ancient age, but this oak will outlast me ( the leaf ) so in the scheme of time I stand outside of it's permanence. Apparently you listen well and understand the language of trees, I hear them too.


Paul

Lon,

Misunderstood your image references I can see the little sister reference when I link from your post. My comment references you last tree post. Anyway the comment does relate to your tree themed series.
Registered on June 30, 2009, 508 Posts, 1907 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on May 20, 2010 at 11:20 AM
Your personal take and as always a fantastic look to these trees, Lon. Truly unmistakable in review of an entire page of thumbnails, these are easily picked out as images needed to be seen at a much larger scale. With overall technology advancements it would seem not too many years in the future we will be reviewing these wonders on Full Screen HD. :cool:

Think of that in the human context..... I'm but a leaf.
An outstanding analogy of the life cycle we experience here on planet earth. :wavey:
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on May 20, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Lon this is wonderful.
I love the colors and the textures.
:toast:
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on May 20, 2010 at 2:07 PM
It goes without saying, that tree has great structure! I like the highlites on the near silhouettes to show that off extremely well. It's the blues in the background, and the orangy golden leaves still hanging on that really make this for me. As mentioned before, this is instantly recognizeable as an "Overacker". I'm also glad you have a good sense of the reality of life and the bigger picture. You know, referring to yourself as a piece of compost and all!!!! :wink:

Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Luis Argerich on May 20, 2010 at 3:34 PM
Hi Lon, I love this shot, it's as if color were raining from the tree.
A Beauty
Registered on December 22, 2009, 91 Posts, 1349 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolas Belokurov on May 20, 2010 at 4:36 PM
What I really enjoy Lon about your photography is the fact that it's so compact and intimate. It's the exact opposite of what I'm looking for at the moment. Really great shot.
Registered on July 22, 2009, 41 Posts, 533 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on May 20, 2010 at 4:57 PM
I viewing this at work on a lousy monitor, but it looks really nice. I like the gold/brown leaves - gives it lots of interest. Also like how you can see through this to the walls beyond.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by David Cobb on May 20, 2010 at 5:34 PM
Beautiful framing with nice touches of color, I find a lot of interest in the background too Lon.
Registered on December 14, 2007, 312 Posts, 3243 Comments
Comment posted by Bruce King on May 20, 2010 at 11:03 PM
I don't know how I missed the previous image the first time around but they are both amazing pieces of work. Pure art, as others have said. If I absolutely had to chose I would say #2, but only by an hair. I think the bg does it.
Registered on January 14, 2010, 276 Posts, 2212 Comments
Comment posted by Kent Mearig on May 21, 2010 at 1:46 AM
I will never ever stop loving granite rock wall backdrops.
Registered on September 4, 2006, 237 Posts, 4748 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Marcellini on May 21, 2010 at 2:06 PM
Interesting to compare the two. Prefer the color of and the pop of leaves. Another great portrait of a tree.
Registered on November 27, 2007, 250 Posts, 2468 Comments
Comment posted by Anthony Vincent on May 22, 2010 at 9:58 AM
It seems as if you have some sort of kindred relationship with your trees Lon. I do love the pop of color here and your framing is really good.
When were drawn to things we love they just look soo good.
Thanks for sharing
Registered on February 5, 2009, 199 Posts, 2775 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on May 22, 2010 at 3:24 PM
Another stunner, Lon. That was some special time we had in the park.

- Dan.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond Marlow on May 23, 2010 at 9:08 PM
Lon just came back from Yosemite and am doing some catching up on views. great look of this tree, I especially love the format for the way the branches move out to the sides of the image and fill in the composition. Great work as always here.
Registered on October 15, 2008, 158 Posts, 531 Comments