Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Hornbeck's Creek Falls
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Hornbeck's Creek Falls

by Neven Dries

Gallery: LandscapePosted June 12, 201083 views6 comments
This is the lower falls from Hornbeck's Creek in the Pocono Mt area of NE Pennsulvania. This is 90% full frame with minor adjustments made to dark,light and clarity in camera raw. C&C appreciated.

canon 7d, 24-105L @ 24mm, f22, 1/5 sec, iso400, raw capture. No filters used.

Comments

6 comments
Comment posted by Ben Horne on June 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM
The composition is good with the waterfall flowing from the left, down the rocks, and into the foreground water. I do wish that there was something else to make it more dynamic though. Maybe stones below the surface in the foreground, or something along those lines.

Also, there is something strange with the smaller resolution image here on this page. It looksas though there was some sort of very heavy noise reduction that has robbed the detail. The larger size looks much better though.
Registered on August 27, 2009, 51 Posts, 959 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Anderson on June 12, 2010 at 11:11 PM
This is a very beautiful scene with an impressionistic quality to it. There seems to be a lack of focus in certain areas that may be intentional applied to keep attention on the waterfall, but it feels a bit heavy handed. If you pull back on that a bit, it would help the image IMO.
Registered on January 31, 2006, 228 Posts, 3072 Comments
Comment posted by Neven Dries on June 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM
I realized the smaller shot here got a bit soft when i downsized it. Here is another shot,, tighter on the same view.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 52 Posts, 160 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on June 14, 2010 at 4:39 PM
Neven,

The second post is head and shoulders above the original. I like the more intimate composition which tells me as the viewer what you're trying to convey. The larger view, while certainly a pretty view, is missing something as someone else mention. Yes, the falls are the main point, but in the larger view it's importance is diminished. I hope this makes sense.

also, I would also agree that it sure looks like compression is killing the original and is also pretty noticeable in the larger version. Even though this has quite a bit of detail, you should be able to resize this without losing so much detail.

I really, really like the second image; the flow from top to bottom creates some great lines and diagonals. Looks like it's also suffering a little from compression, but not as bad as the original.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Neven Dries on June 16, 2010 at 7:10 PM
Everyone, TY for the great comments. I realized that I had a bit of a problem downsizing and losing a lot in the compressions. Is there a good way to resize from 18MP down to 1MP for posting?

Lon, you're right,, I realized after posting that the second shot was definitely a much better composition.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 52 Posts, 160 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Richter on December 26, 2010 at 9:05 AM
Ignoring technical aspects, the second version is really great, and maybe it would stand some more cropping at the top. A very dynamic composition, emphasizing the force of water!

Peter
Registered on November 10, 2010, 218 Posts, 2723 Comments