Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Pale Pink Lilies VI
‹ PreviousFlora GalleryNext ›

Pale Pink Lilies VI

by Steven M Kahn

Gallery: FloraPosted July 12, 201077 views16 comments
Oops, I erred in my last post. This is the fourth image from my second session with these lilies. And the last from this session that I will work up.

All technical data posted earlier.

If you are getting tired of seeing them, take heart, only a few more captures from three more sessions before these beauties were retired.

Comments

16 comments
Comment posted by David Cobb on July 12, 2010 at 10:15 AM
Whatever the session Steve, the images are still gorgeous.
Registered on December 14, 2007, 312 Posts, 3243 Comments
Comment posted by Balakumar Kaushik on July 12, 2010 at 12:52 PM
Loved the subtle pinks and the patterns in the petals.
Beautiful looking flowers.
Registered on January 4, 2008, 98 Posts, 1403 Comments
Comment posted by Kathy Odiorne on July 12, 2010 at 3:08 PM
Another SWEET lily image, Steve. This has been a most excellent series. I notice no buds in this one, but still works for me. :toast:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 211 Posts, 1471 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on July 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM
The variety in the comps make them all a pleasure to look at. The lighting works particularly well in this shot.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on July 12, 2010 at 7:12 PM
These are real beauties Steven. Beautiful work in all respects.

Pat
Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Buck on July 12, 2010 at 8:10 PM
I think this is my second favorite of the series Steven. I really like the comp, and the sharpness and beauty of the blooms is fantastic. Excellent work.

Nathan
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1101 Posts, 13589 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on July 12, 2010 at 9:18 PM
Hi steven :wavey: A splendid composition, along with superb color, light. and detail :eek: :cool: :smile:
Albert Darmo. Canada
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by Ramamohan Pai on July 12, 2010 at 9:46 PM
Another great addition to your series, Steven. Very enjoyable series this has been (a few notches above the Chicory Series from last year) :toast:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 550 Posts, 9037 Comments
Comment posted by Steven M Kahn on July 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM
Thank you David, Balakumar, Kathy, Morris, Pat, Nathan, Albert, and Ram. Ram, :smile: , I think I might have grown since the Chic series. Maybe. A litle bit.
Registered on July 20, 2009, 140 Posts, 1198 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Yeoh on July 13, 2010 at 12:13 AM
A superb series. Enjoyed looking at them all. Thanks for sharing. :toast:
Registered on September 1, 2009, 588 Posts, 8184 Comments
Comment posted by Brigitte Lorenz on July 13, 2010 at 1:52 AM
Excellent details, a wonderful presentation...

Brigitte
Registered on January 10, 2009, 187 Posts, 1507 Comments
Comment posted by jamie pringle on July 13, 2010 at 5:31 PM
You have presented a masterful composition with strong lighting, and detail. Beautiful flowers and beautiful photograph :toast:
Registered on August 10, 2005, 323 Posts, 1216 Comments
Comment posted by Catherine Reilly on July 14, 2010 at 1:00 AM
It'd be hard to get tired of seeing the likes of this- both the flowers and the images. Beautiful work. :toast:
Registered on August 16, 2006, 603 Posts, 9192 Comments
Comment posted by Debashis Bandyopad on July 14, 2010 at 2:13 AM
Wow, this is even better than the last one.. Excellent capture Steven and I laud the way you keep working at a series. :toast: :toast:
Registered on June 24, 2007, 130 Posts, 1309 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on July 14, 2010 at 10:11 PM
Sweet!
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on July 17, 2010 at 5:54 PM
Steven: No buds in this one so its unique. I think I would like this more if the third bloom wasn't there. It seems to break up the simplicity and symmetry of the shot. Great lighting still. >=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments