Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Avalanche Creek
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Avalanche Creek

by Catherine Reilly

Gallery: LandscapePosted August 6, 2010110 views13 comments
in Glacier NP back in May. The color of the rock there is so unique. I didn't try for the silky water flow here; I rather liked the texture in the churning whitewater and the color of the water. There's a lot of white on the left... Does that ruin the shot or is it balanced well enough by the boulders?

Thanks for looking.

Oh, D700, 24-70 at 24; f8 at 1/5.

Comments

13 comments
Comment posted by Greg Maklae on August 6, 2010 at 6:33 AM
While the exposure speed does add nice texture, the white on the left side is hurting my eyes. maybe a GND filter, with the darkest portion over the water will help, or an HDR of a couple images.
Registered on November 18, 2008, 170 Posts, 759 Comments
Comment posted by David W. Kelly on August 6, 2010 at 8:48 AM
I love the comp but I miss the silky water flow :smile: (just kidding). I like the water and I think it adds drama to the image. :toast:
Registered on October 7, 2005, 883 Posts, 6590 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on August 6, 2010 at 9:15 AM
I like that you resisted the long exposure smooth water look on this. The white on the left does bother me though - you may be able to selectively pull out some more color and detail and contrast in that section with some time invested.

- Luke
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Taylor Reed on August 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM
I do find the white portion a little heavy. The frozen action of the water works nicely otherwise, though.
Registered on February 18, 2010, 26 Posts, 556 Comments
Comment posted by Barry Vangrov on August 6, 2010 at 1:17 PM
I agree with the other comments: Nice comp but that white water on the left is just too bright. It doesn't look completely blown, though, so you might be able to work with it.
Registered on September 1, 2009, 148 Posts, 749 Comments
Comment posted by Tyson Fisher on August 6, 2010 at 1:59 PM
Yes, it does look like you might be able to pull some detail out of the whitewater. A touch darker and this scene will look nice and balanced to my eye. Other than that, I'm liking your chosen shutter speed, you captured the feeling of being next to this beautiful mountain stream.
Registered on September 17, 2008, 44 Posts, 623 Comments
Comment posted by Anthony Vincent on August 6, 2010 at 2:55 PM
I immediately thought "refreshing". Really like the stop action water which really portrays it's power and force.
Thanks for sharing
Registered on February 5, 2009, 199 Posts, 2775 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on August 6, 2010 at 8:14 PM
I love your fast exposure here! :smile: The brightness doesnt bother me a bit; the trees in the urhc pull my eye a bit, but not a real problem. Very nice!
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on August 6, 2010 at 11:18 PM
I'm kind of a sucker for silky water! But I do like the tonality you retained by the faster shutter speed. Nothing really bothers me here. It's a nice image with a harmoniuos flow.

Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on August 7, 2010 at 12:56 PM
I'm a fan of both silky water and frozen action so I like this a lot. The white on the left doesn't bother me at all. As far as I'm concerned there's a lot to like about this - very enjoyable.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on August 7, 2010 at 1:25 PM
I usually like the water exposed longer but here the shutter speed looks very interesting as well. The rocks look a little too magenta for my taste, but they could be like this in reality of course.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on August 7, 2010 at 3:08 PM
Catherine,

I'm will Bill C. - I like both and with water scenes, I think it's image independent how you want to portray water. And of course in many, many cases, you don't have a choice with small apertures and dark canyons (well, I guess one could use ISO 6400 or something, but fewer choices with film.) Anyway, your scene here works very well with the frozen water and the left side doesn't bother me too much, although it could be toned down. I really like the deep color in water that's been brought out. Nice job.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Igor Hoveijn on August 7, 2010 at 4:58 PM
Beautiful colors, white, green and brown, very harmonious. I do like the frozen action of the water. I would perhaps crop the white boulder below, keeping as much as possible of the brown boulders which are great. There could be less white on the left. Anyway very nice picture to look at.
Registered on August 7, 2010, 0 Posts, 9 Comments