Gallery: LandscapePosted August 9, 2010152 views17 comments
As I wait for the wildflowers to come in at Rainier, I find myself exploring alternate subjects with more depth. This is a creek right before it reaches the crest of Narada Falls.
Canon 7D,
Canon 50mm f/1.4
ISO 100
f/16
1 sec.
Comments
17 comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on August 9, 2010 at 7:22 PM
Very cool dude!
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Cartamil on August 9, 2010 at 7:57 PM
Wow, very graphically appealing and well-exposed, good use of shutter speed as well. I might try to bring out the whites just a tiny bit in the lower half, as the 'dappling' effect of light in the top half is very appealing.
Registered on November 15, 2007, 50 Posts, 601 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Lou on August 9, 2010 at 10:04 PM
Nice shadow/light and motion/static play in abstraction. Very cool.
Jim
Registered on August 3, 2010, 86 Posts, 273 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on August 9, 2010 at 11:11 PM
Better than wildflowers, IMO. Excellent textures both locally and globally.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Dean Sauskojus on August 9, 2010 at 11:34 PM
Nice effect Justin. The tones are great for a B&W. Lovely image.
Registered on September 29, 2009, 137 Posts, 2659 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on August 10, 2010 at 12:22 AM
Justin,
This is fantastic! The cascade of water, the patterns, contrast and light are just fabulous. AND it's really got me guessing because I can't figure out if this has some nice dappled light on the scene, or is it simply a matter of variations in the cascade over the rocks, the shutter speed etc. - I can't tell if there's any direct light or if it's all diffused. But no matter, I'm really loving this capture. Of course we've seen a gazillion images of waterfalls, cascades, silky water, etc. etc., but this I think is pretty unique. Congrats, very impressive work.
Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on August 10, 2010 at 12:26 AM
This is like the water version of crazy paving. Great idea to use BW to emphasize the patterns. Superb!
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Vance Gese on August 10, 2010 at 12:51 AM
Beautiful study of tone and motion Justin. Excellent work.
Registered on November 13, 2008, 298 Posts, 6629 Comments
Comment posted by Stuart Williams on August 10, 2010 at 1:51 AM
very good composition and choice of contrast levels making for a fabulously interesting image.
Registered on December 7, 2007, 247 Posts, 4792 Comments
Comment posted by Roman Kurywczak on August 10, 2010 at 4:25 PM
Brilliant in its simplicity Justin!!! A comp often overlook or missed....executed perfectly!
Registered on November 20, 2009, 56 Posts, 748 Comments
Comment posted by Hamed Musharbak on August 10, 2010 at 4:48 PM
Great waterfall abstract
i like it
Hamed
Registered on June 1, 2009, 372 Posts, 2282 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on August 11, 2010 at 3:49 AM
Deserving of more replies in my opinion.
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Pete Bengeyfield on August 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM
Clever idea and well exected.
Registered on December 2, 2003, 1247 Posts, 3439 Comments
Comment posted by Justin Reznick on August 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM
Mark - Thanks man! I rely so heavily on this forum for images like this one. The feedback that I have received has been terrific. i did hope for a better response but it's from comments like this and comments from Tony and Lon and others that really help me to gauge the critical acceptance of my image!
Registered on November 24, 2009, 79 Posts, 515 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Sieren on August 11, 2010 at 5:39 PM
I like the detail and texture throughout the image Justin. One thing I feel would make it better would to watch the web sharpening where parts of the water begin to look like rough cotton instead of the silky look that slow shutter speed waterfalls usually have.
Registered on January 2, 2008, 360 Posts, 5321 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on August 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM
"...it's from comments like this and comments from Tony and Lon and others that really help me to gauge the critical acceptance of my image!"
In some ways that MIGHT be a good thing. But I can tell you that if you enter (or have entered) the market (anything like the fine art market) what gets rave reviews and accolades here on this forum is NO reflection of the rave reviews accolades and most importantly the purchases of your work out in the market! The images I post here that get almost totally overlooked are often the best sellers. The ones that dazzle and amaze here, are almost always not the great sellers. I think we often love to try to out do each other (and I include myself in that statement) but lose track sometimes of what is just simply beautiful to many or most. I can never forget what my mentor Ken Duncan (AU) told me a few years ago: "don't shoot for photographers!" Even today that still rings in my head, and I now see the wisdom. But sometimes I like to do both types.
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Justin Reznick on August 12, 2010 at 7:19 PM
Mark - Great advice! I am in the fine art market and couldn't agree more! Photographers and fine art buyers are often in two very different camps!
Registered on November 24, 2009, 79 Posts, 515 Comments
Comments
17 commentsJim
This is fantastic! The cascade of water, the patterns, contrast and light are just fabulous. AND it's really got me guessing because I can't figure out if this has some nice dappled light on the scene, or is it simply a matter of variations in the cascade over the rocks, the shutter speed etc. - I can't tell if there's any direct light or if it's all diffused. But no matter, I'm really loving this capture. Of course we've seen a gazillion images of waterfalls, cascades, silky water, etc. etc., but this I think is pretty unique. Congrats, very impressive work.
Lon
i like it
Hamed
In some ways that MIGHT be a good thing. But I can tell you that if you enter (or have entered) the market (anything like the fine art market) what gets rave reviews and accolades here on this forum is NO reflection of the rave reviews accolades and most importantly the purchases of your work out in the market! The images I post here that get almost totally overlooked are often the best sellers. The ones that dazzle and amaze here, are almost always not the great sellers. I think we often love to try to out do each other (and I include myself in that statement) but lose track sometimes of what is just simply beautiful to many or most. I can never forget what my mentor Ken Duncan (AU) told me a few years ago: "don't shoot for photographers!" Even today that still rings in my head, and I now see the wisdom. But sometimes I like to do both types.