Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Misty Morning Cruise
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Misty Morning Cruise

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted September 6, 2010539 views19 comments
Hey all,

I recently captured this image during my first (of - hopefully - many!) trips to the Johnstone Strait region near the northern tip of Vancouver Island on the central Pacific coast. The region is known for its biological richness, which partly manifests itself in the form of a large number of resident Orcas (aka Killer Whales) and other aquatic mammals (including Humpback Whales, the occasion Gray Whale, various dolphin and porpoise species, and both Steller Sea Lions and Harbor Seals). The Orcas are, more or less, "emblematic" of the region and I hoped to create at least one image that captured what I considered to be the "essence" of the region. I think this may be that image.

Technically this was a real tough image to capture (and process, for that matter) - there were a lot of constraints/hurdles to overcome. And, of course, there was a lot of luck involved. The biggest lucky break came with the presentation of this great scene to me - the wonderful lighting and mist were a godsend, and then to have the two Orcas swimming by...well...yes, sometimes I DO have horseshoes up my ____! But what's that old saying? Oh yeah..."f8 and be there!"...and fortunately I was there.

I will take credit (or the blame!) for a few decisions leading to the production of this image. First...that background was WAY in the distance - and I wanted those ridges to be a dominant part of my composition. Plus, I wanted the distance between the whales and the ridges compressed and more or less "stacked up". So...I needed to use a relatively long lens to produce the image I wanted. To completely freeze the movement of the Orcas I needed quite a fast shutter speed - somewhere in the range of 1/1000s or higher. The obvious first thought is to open up the aperture to get the speed you need to freeze the action (after all, I was shooting with a f2.8 400mm lens). However, if I did this and focused on the Orcas I wouldn't have had the depth of field to render the background sharply (which is something I felt was important in making the shot work). Hmmm. One potential solution would be to crank the ISO WAY up so I could both stop down (to maybe f11 or smaller) and still shoot at a high shutter speed. Good idea in theory, but my own past experience with my D700 has taught me that these kind of mid-tone dominated scenes can really show noise at moderate to high ISO's (and I would have needed ISO 1600 or higher to get the DOF and shutter speed I needed) so I discarded the concept of cranking up the ISO (and I honestly doubt I could have found the DOF I needed anyway).

So...on to plan B. Instead of trying to push the laws of optics in a single image, I decided that the only way to get the shot I wanted was to capture two images - each focused on a different part of the scene - and then merge the two images in Photoshop. So...I waited until the Orcas were exactly where I wanted in the scene and shot a burst of images as they surfaced, then (without moving the camera), I toggled my focus bracket higher in the frame, re-focused on the ridges, and shot another quick burst of images. Then, to make a long story short, I merged the best images from each burst into a single image using Photoshop CS5. So what you're looking at here is actually what I call a "focal plane composite" of two shots of the same scene.

Which leads to an interesting question: Is this type of image creation "ethical"? There's no doubt that this is "slippery slope" issue that's dominated by shades of grey. But it's my view that image "corrections" made to compensate for the limitations of our cameras and/or lenses (and I know of few who would argue that our eye sees the world with the shallow depth of field that a super-telephoto lens does when shot wide open) are completely legitimate. In this case I used modern technology to increase the depth of field of an image that I THINK more closely replicates the scene I observed in the field. And I have a hard time accepting this is wrong. But, whenever I perform such a correction, I do feel compelled to openly disclose how the image was created. Then at least you can be the judge!

Subject: Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) - just after sunrise
Location: Johnstone Strait region (northern Vancouver Island), BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D700
Lens: Nikkor 400 mm f/2.8 VRII lens - handheld from sailboat. VR on and in "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/1600ss at f5. ISO 200. -0.33 stop compensation from matrix metered exposure.
Crop: Full frame horizontal - very minor crop off sky at top

All the contextual information surrounding this shot (field notes, all camera settings and processing details, conservation, etc.) can be found at:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/mammals/other/.

Comments and feedback greatly appreciated...probably better to view larger version prior to doing so...

Cheers...

Brad

I intend to begin offering an 8-day Instructional Photo Tours to this fantastic region in August of 2011. If anyone is curious about the tour, feel free to email me or check out the tour entitled "Orcas, Humpbacks and More: Aquatic Mammals of the Central Pacific Coast" on the Photo Tour page of my website...

Comments

19 comments
Comment posted by Carol Nichols on September 6, 2010 at 5:07 PM
Absolutely stunning image Brad. Whether or not it is ethical can only be decided by yourself as every person will have a different opinion as to exactly what photo processing is ethical or not. To me, I just see an incredible photo made by an incredible photographer.
Registered on November 7, 2007, 161 Posts, 1420 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on September 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM
Brad, if this were a painting there would be no argument viz ethics. This is a lovely image, and as long as you explain how it was made, no one should have a problem. If you are not trying to deceive, where is the problem. I repeat—this is a lovely image, well composed. You described the composition more than adequately. Nothing unethical there.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Pete Bengeyfield on September 6, 2010 at 5:38 PM
Just superb! I'm OK with the "ethics" of this. It doesn't misrepresent what happened or what you saw.
Registered on December 2, 2003, 1247 Posts, 3439 Comments
Comment posted by Jorne de Bruin on September 6, 2010 at 5:50 PM
So I happen to hop into the fauna gallery before I go to bed to see if there are any nice images, and I see this awesome landscape ruined by some black stuff in front.... Thanks a lot man now I can't stop thinking about it!

Simply a stunning landscape, uhm I mean image Brad! Think you made the right choice about using a focal blend, it's all about the artists vision, don't let optic law hold you back :wink: :toast: :wavey:

I meant to say: It's all about the artists vision, as long as it is within reason. Don't you start adding even more Orca's!
Registered on June 26, 2008, 178 Posts, 2136 Comments
Comment posted by Max Waugh on September 6, 2010 at 11:27 PM
Okay, so it's an "illustration." Obviously depending on the usage (editorial, especially) some folks would take issue with it. Still, for me it's one of the more memorable images in your collection, Brad. I love misty layers of mountains and hills, and the orcas are a wonderful foreground subject to complement them. btw- really like the color too. It's way too easy to get washed out in a scene like this.

Max
Registered on September 26, 2008, 428 Posts, 2329 Comments
Comment posted by Sandra Hendrikse on September 7, 2010 at 7:35 AM
Wow, what a wonderful image. :smile: :smile:
Registered on January 23, 2008, 48 Posts, 769 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on September 7, 2010 at 8:04 AM
Great visualization & presentation ! I truly appreciate your commentary in detail and how you overcame the technical barrier. Since all the elements are from the same scene, I find it ok.
I may prefer, not to cut into the white clouds on the top of frame, if there's no room, may prefer to crop out top layer of white clouds.
Jagdeep Rajput :toast:
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Ingrid Vekemans on September 7, 2010 at 12:20 PM
I completely agree with John and Phil - the end result is a most wonderful photo and it has been made with skill and vision. Thank you very much for sharing the technical information!
Registered on August 2, 2010, 138 Posts, 780 Comments
Comment posted by Clinton Bauder on September 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Beautiful shot of one of my favorite parts of the world. The focus stacking doesn't bother me in the slightest, especially since you are open about it. Lovely. :toast:
Registered on December 8, 2009, 31 Posts, 231 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on September 7, 2010 at 2:05 PM
Terrific use of layers. I agree with Jagdeep about taking a sliver from the top.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Ákos Lumnitzer on September 7, 2010 at 4:19 PM
When I opened this image I looked and said WOW! Those background mountains all layered up and the perfectly placed foreground orcas really balance the comp and it looks so monochromatic that I would even consider doing a B&W version. My hat goes off to you for disclosing how you have thought out and created this image. For me personally it is beyond what I would do, however, that is also probably because I simply like to create an exposure and make the best of it. Though I have combined several shots the same way to create a panoramic image. Therefore, I would think the process is the same pretty much. All in all, honesty is the way to go and you exemplify just that.

:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
Registered on April 24, 2004, 25 Posts, 510 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Richins on September 7, 2010 at 4:57 PM
Landscape photographers do DOF stacking all the time. Don't worry about it. I like the result here. Further, the layers you've captured here are incredible. From the small waves, to the whales, to the mountains and clouds--there's a great pattern going on here. The hue of the blue bugs me a bit--I wish it was a little bluer. Also, for my personal tastes, I'd like a bit more contrast in the mountains and clouds.
Registered on March 6, 2008, 113 Posts, 1009 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on September 7, 2010 at 8:01 PM
Wow, what a piece of art! Love the shades of blue and the unique west coast landscape, complete with the Orcas. I really wonder how you were able to merge the photos without having used a tripod, all software I guess. Another amazing Brad Hill image. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Runco on September 7, 2010 at 10:52 PM
Excellent composite image Brad - doesn't get much better than this!

:toast: :toast: :toast:
Registered on September 9, 2008, 77 Posts, 705 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on September 8, 2010 at 4:39 AM
Incredible image Brad! :eek:

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Ajit Huilgol on September 8, 2010 at 8:24 AM
Brad, there are some images that cause goosebumps and the eyes go moist. This is one such image. By the way, I think I was in the very same waters that very day. I had gone over from Knight Inlet Lodge to see and photograph orcas, and Jamie Scarrow (do you know him?) thought he recognised you on the Ocean Liner 2 I think it was named. I'll start posting those images soon.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 302 Posts, 2055 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on September 8, 2010 at 10:58 PM
Hey all,

Thanks to all for your kind comments on this shot - they're truly appreciated! I wasn't "worried" about the ethics of the focal blend/stacking, but thought it would make an interesting discussion topic (which it apparently did)! A few specific responses:

To Jorne: RE: "and I see this awesome landscape ruined by some black stuff in front..."Sorry 'bout the black junk in front (dirty sensor??) - I would have cloned them out, but you know how I feel about cloning! And sorry if I interrupted your sleep!! :wink:

To Ákos: RE: Going B&W with this - see my next post - coming Thurs AM!

To Ron: RE: "I'd like a bit more contrast in the mountains and clouds." If this were simply a landscape shot I would have done that. But...to me the subject of this image is still the Orca, and I wanted the Orca to be significantly darker in appearance than the mountains/clouds (so they wouldn't compete for attention with the Orca).

To Ajit: RE: "I think I was in the very same waters that very day." This was shot on the morning of August 25, in Blackfish Sound (near Johnstone Strait - and not too, too far from Knight Inlet). I don't know Jamie Scarrow (should I??), but he was right that I was on the Ocean Light II on that day! It would have been great if our paths had crossed - maybe another time!

Thanks again...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Andre Joanisse on September 9, 2010 at 1:34 AM
I was wondering when you would be back. This is a gorgeous image Brad. As luck as it, you happen to be there but in the end, the way you have capture and processed it speaks highly of your vision. The layers in the mountains, the mist, the sharp orcas in the foreground. It all works here.

Thanks for sharing the image and technique.

André
Registered on October 15, 2006, 4 Posts, 81 Comments
Comment posted by Luca Mussato on September 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM
First: the photo is fantastic. Before reading your commentary i thought "hey how the hell he did it?" then i start reading and i realized... Second: is it ethical? IMHO it is especially if the "artist" do not try to hide his intentions and describe the technics he used. Post productions has always been used (burning,maskings, different layouts and subsequent impressions) in the dark room, differently yes because of the supports, but that is and not always it has been declared!!. The difference is in the new technologies both from the support and the dark room Photoshop or whatever else PP tools are the modern dark rooms and not everyone have the necessary skills to produce such an image as well as not everyone had in the past. Ah, i would add that first of all you must have the idea.
Cheers, Luca
Registered on November 14, 2006, 118 Posts, 855 Comments