Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Columbine with Repost
‹ PreviousFlora GalleryNext ›

Columbine with Repost

by Richard Teller

Gallery: FloraPosted November 22, 201093 views11 comments
This was taken in Jasper National Park. I would really like some opinions, does this work or not. It is appealing to me in many ways, but I am not sure about the background. I was trying to get a different angle on the flower. Cropped to about 80% of the original. All C&C welcome.

Canon 30D
Sigma 17-70
Aperture Priority
Shutter 1/180
Aperture f4
ISO 100
57mm
-1 Exposure Comp.
Curves

Comments

11 comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on November 22, 2010 at 10:20 PM
I have no problem with comp or techs, and the detail in the flower is excellent. However, the lighting is an issue for me. I prefer images shot in a natural environment to include a natural looking BG. Here, the lighting is too contrasty for my tastes. I also find the bright spots in the ULC to be distracting.
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on November 22, 2010 at 11:11 PM
Richard: I like the POF especially and the comp works fine for me. The brighter areas in the ULC BG are not deal breakers for me. I did note what looks like some cloning artifacts in the LLC that I think should go away. >=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Krunal Janani on November 23, 2010 at 3:31 AM
Lovely POV Richard, lovely looking flower :smile:
Registered on September 16, 2010, 60 Posts, 1370 Comments
Comment posted by Carol Hyman on November 23, 2010 at 9:40 AM
Richard, I can see why this is appealing. The Columbine has a beautiful color and a very fragile appearance. I think the shooting angle might have worked far better if the shutter speed had been faster. Not crazy about the mottled background.

Ciao ;^)

Carol
Registered on January 18, 2007, 597 Posts, 8062 Comments
Comment posted by Debashis Bandyopad on November 23, 2010 at 12:36 PM
Richard, I am half way on this... Like the comp and your POF, but the bg/light isn't working for me.
Registered on June 24, 2007, 130 Posts, 1309 Comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on November 23, 2010 at 6:09 PM
I'd probably clone out the white spots in the upper left Richard. For my tastes the blur behind the petal on the right is a distraction but I doubt that anyone else is bothered by it. A very creative and interesting take on a columbine.

pat
Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Sabiston on November 23, 2010 at 9:47 PM
I like what yo uare trying to do here. I agree the contrast is a bit too strong. The BG is OK.

I am very much a fan of classic poses and this qualifies, bu tto really make it cook, I would eliminate everything in the upper frame that is brighter than the subject flower, incuding the out of focus flower behind and to the right. I would also get rid of the lighter spot in the upper left that the others mentioned.

Instead of the high contrast, I would use a discreet combination of sharpening, midtone contrast and a high pass filter to work the detailing. The trick is to use a light hand in the processing.

Lots of potential here.



Registered on April 7, 2007, 134 Posts, 443 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on November 25, 2010 at 12:01 PM
I evened our the background using the burn tool in PSE.
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on November 25, 2010 at 9:02 PM
Hi Richard :wavey: The even B.G in the repost works wonders :eek: Now we have a fine Columbine capture :cool: :smile:
Albert Darmo. Canada
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on November 26, 2010 at 12:07 PM
A compelling portrait. I like the pov and the dof. Well done!
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Wolfenden on November 26, 2010 at 6:45 PM
There is a definite mood to this, Richard, which I think the sombre tones help achieve. I like the composition and the way the flower comes forward into the frame ( the outer petals looking like wings ) but am less keen on the upper bg lights. I would have left the pale, lower ones in the repost - just my 2 cents worth !
Registered on May 18, 2007, 1108 Posts, 7647 Comments