Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Dreams of Solitude
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Dreams of Solitude

by Floris van Breugel

Gallery: LandscapePosted December 2, 20101,559 views43 comments
A lonely cottonwood, which some of you may recognize, in Escalante at moonset. Best viewed in a relatively dark room, or you can see it on a fully dark background on my website: dark background.

Thanks for your thoughts!

Also, I reprocessed my previous post (gave it a little more punch in contrast), you can see it (along with a larger version) on my blog now: blog. I welcome any comments/critiques on that one as well.

Comments

43 comments
Comment posted by Jimmy Gekas on December 2, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Sweet take on this great location! I really like the burst of colors above the dark, moody abyss. :toast:
Registered on July 26, 2007, 244 Posts, 2807 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on December 2, 2010 at 1:05 PM
Wow, the dark background makes a huge difference. Thanks for linking it. I know this spot well and this is a sweet image from there. Beautifully done.
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Aaron Cowan on December 2, 2010 at 1:21 PM
Floris,
The sky movement along with the star trails makes for a surreal shot. Excellent capture:toast:
Registered on September 22, 2010, 8 Posts, 165 Comments
Comment posted by Jason Kim on December 2, 2010 at 1:22 PM
Very intriguing shot! The sky is wonderful and the stars are a fantastic touch.
Registered on July 1, 2006, 60 Posts, 1233 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 2, 2010 at 1:30 PM
Very nice, Floris. I know how much work it took for you to pull this off. The sky is fantastic. If anything, I might prefer just a hint more detail below the tree. Getting the light to not look awfully unnatural in a light-paint/blended exposure like this is tough, but for me, this works.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 2, 2010 at 1:36 PM
Thanks Marc! I really appreciated your suggestions when I was working on it at Guy's place too -- definitely helped me in the final processing attempt. Do you mean bring out a little more detail in the sandstone curve, or in bowl itself?
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Abdullaziz Bin Ali on December 2, 2010 at 1:42 PM
Super, Excellent work
the technique you applied is perfect
Registered on May 31, 2009, 112 Posts, 1590 Comments
Comment posted by Geoffrey Baker on December 2, 2010 at 2:07 PM
A very unusual and original image :smile:
Well done.

Geoff.
Registered on August 20, 2010, 192 Posts, 980 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 2, 2010 at 2:11 PM
Maybe a tad more below the tree, in the bowl. I'm in a crappy lighting situation right now though, so maybe a little tough to tell.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 2, 2010 at 2:42 PM
Nope. Got back out of the light and it looks just fine now.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 2, 2010 at 2:54 PM
haha, thanks Marc. Yea.. these kinds of shots are so sensitive to monitor calibrations, ambient lightening, website backgrounds etc... but you probably know that better than anyone!
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Phil Pogledich on December 2, 2010 at 3:06 PM
Well, you've certainly taken a familiar subject (to those of us on NPN) and put a different spin on it. Beautiful work! I also checked out your blog and I have to say that I might prefer your original post of the "oils" shot to the rework . . . for what it's worth, I also have to add that my favorite overall is the one with the cottonwood leaf that is included on your blog.
Registered on August 24, 2009, 123 Posts, 3099 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Dayton on December 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM
Well seen and captured, Floris! This says simplicity and
elegance to me. Glad to see you posting again.
Registered on November 11, 2008, 281 Posts, 3958 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 2, 2010 at 3:20 PM
Thanks Phil - I really appreciate the feedback. For the oils shot I was thinking I might go half way between the two. The one with the leaf is my favorite of the two as well.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Luis Argerich on December 2, 2010 at 3:54 PM
Hi Floris,
Still wandering at night ah?
Very creative and really amazing execution. This is a beauty from any angle.
Superb!

:toast:
Registered on December 22, 2009, 91 Posts, 1349 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on December 2, 2010 at 4:00 PM
Oh yeah, I remember this spot :wink:
Beautiful presentation and I agree the dark background does make a big difference.

Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Todd Liotine on December 2, 2010 at 4:11 PM
Beautiful and creates a wonderfull mood, your own take on a recognizable location. I really like the direction of the light rays in contrast to the stars.
Registered on July 1, 2008, 131 Posts, 671 Comments
Comment posted by Koveh Tavakkol on December 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM
Just beautiful Floris.. really nice take on this shot. I love the sky in this shot, and even though I am looking at it on an none calibrated monitor and bad lighting conditions, it still looks great. The darkness adds to the mystery in my opinion.
Registered on September 1, 2009, 41 Posts, 608 Comments
Comment posted by Adam Gibbs on December 2, 2010 at 5:08 PM
Neat stuff Floris, the sky is quite other worldly looking. :smile:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 168 Posts, 870 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on December 2, 2010 at 6:11 PM
I dunno Floris. The stars are bugging my eyes out in this one. Perhaps it is the direction of the stars in relation to the direction of the clouds, but it seems somewhat disjointed to me. I almost feel it would have looked much better with either complete trails or no trails at all.

But, everyone else seems to like it, so what do I know. ;]

Nice work with illuminating the inside of that bowl though. Couldn't have been easy to get that right.
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by Justin Reznick on December 2, 2010 at 6:15 PM
I love everything about this image Floris except for the star trails. Their motion, conflicting with the incredible rays from the moonset, creates an uneasiness, and their unnatural appearance interrupts an image that other wise feels very natural, despite a long exposure on the moonset. There's no doubting the originality and skill involved in this image, but the first question I always ask myself when critiquing is whether or not I would hang this on a wall, and then following up with a why or why not.

I don't see as many comments on the flip side on NPN and I thought I might as well add my two cents. I hope it's helpful Floris!
Registered on November 24, 2009, 79 Posts, 515 Comments
Comment posted by John Mumaw on December 2, 2010 at 6:33 PM
A truly masterful job of vision and execution here! The dark background did indeed make a world of difference. I kinda like the star trails, but could take 'em or leave 'em, as this works well either way.
Registered on September 9, 2005, 62 Posts, 2289 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 2, 2010 at 6:46 PM
Thanks folks!

Justin and Nicolaus - I really appreciate the critical feedback. Sometimes I feel I don't see/get enough of it (though there's more on this forum than anywhere else I've seen). In this case star trails were unavoidable given that I wanted the streaking clouds (and thus needed a long enough - 5min at least - exposure to get them). I personally would have liked static stars as well, and I did take some fast exposures, but the cloud forms simply weren't surreal and elegant enough to work with the mood I wanted to create. With a LOT of work I could remove the trails, and replace them with static stars, but I'm against doing such severe alterations to my images (ie. something which is disobeys the laws of physics). In the end, my hope is that the star trails will add to the surreal effect for most people, which they seem to be doing ok.

Since my first introduction of digitally produced/blended static starry twilight landscape images two and half years ago they've become so popular they they've lost much of their charm for me... so I've got to try something new.

Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Rossbach on December 2, 2010 at 6:51 PM
Dance Hall Rock, loving this Floris!! :toast:
Registered on November 25, 2005, 484 Posts, 1377 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Greenwood on December 2, 2010 at 8:28 PM
Exquisite! I do recognize this location. I think Guy Tal has posted a composition from here. It seems to me, even considering the impact of the background, that the image on your web site has a bit more punch to it.
Registered on November 9, 2003, 229 Posts, 1523 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 2, 2010 at 9:03 PM
Thanks Jim - I was noticing that too. For some reason the one on my website has crisper web sharpening. Not sure how that happened.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on December 2, 2010 at 9:06 PM
So much going on here. It's a fun melange of elements. Is this one exposure?

Psychedelic Soup is really fun. What a great abstract image. A bit too Kuyperish on the colors maybe, but it's the type of image that can handle it :wink:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Jeremy Kessler on December 2, 2010 at 9:18 PM
Love it Floris!
Registered on September 13, 2007, 36 Posts, 1283 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 2, 2010 at 9:33 PM
Thanks Tony! I detailed it a bit more on my blog, but this is 4 exposures put together. Two for the sky (could just as well have been one exposure), and two for the landscape -- one taken in the early dawn with some light painting accents, and just a little extra light from an exposure taken long before dawn with a spotlight shining on top/back of the tree.

I was thinking of pulling back on the punch in the Soup a little.. we'll see. Sometimes it takes me a few days to really settle in on something. Thanks for the feedback!
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on December 2, 2010 at 9:34 PM
Floris, I totally understand where you are coming from on a technical standpoint. What I am wondering..and it's probably pushing the limits quite a bit, is if one took the necessary long exposure of the clouds and moon set, and then went about combining several images in order to accumulate enough for the star trails. Then perhaps finding a way to blend the series together. You could have your semi-long moonlit cloud exposure with the combined star trails overlayed into/onto (via screen blend possibly) it. If you light painted, you could forego the additional photograh/s needed to obtain proper dynamic range in the foreground.

Dunno...it's a thought. And I still firmly believe that we as photographers are only scraping the top of what can be done with nightscapes. There may be more of them out there than a year or two ago, but they are barely a drop in the ocean compared to the tsunami of daylight related photographs. It's good to see you are continuing to try new things. And hell, just because no one has thought of (or officially posted) new and creative ways to take nightscapes does not mean there are none out there.... ;]
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 3, 2010 at 3:33 AM
Yes, something like that's certainly possible, Nicolaus. The problem is you don't know what the clouds are going to do over a period of 30 minutes, and in many cases you'll lose any structure in the cloud movement and it'll just be a bright blob. I'll probably be trying some stuff like that in the future though, so we'll see what happens.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Bruce King on December 3, 2010 at 9:00 AM
Awesome Floris. Love the sar trails and yeah, the dark bg put this one over the top. Nice! :toast:
Registered on January 14, 2010, 276 Posts, 2212 Comments
Comment posted by Jay Patel on December 3, 2010 at 9:14 AM
To half of the image is well done. The bottom half of the image looks very dark...even when viewed on black background (specially when viewed in ambient light).

The composition and star trials are very well done.
Registered on August 28, 2008, 87 Posts, 566 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on December 3, 2010 at 9:54 AM
Wonderful once again, Floris. Definitely looks better with the dark background on your website.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on December 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM
A screen blend would only use the brightest portions of the image. I suppose it all depends on when the photograph was taken. Say a 3 - 10 minute shot for the cloud and moon set. Wait a couple of hours for any light to completely bleed out of the sky. Then, if the amount of cloud cover was minimal, several shots over the course of half an hour or so might allow one to get a nice low noise star trail sky to blend into the cloud/moon shot.
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 3, 2010 at 1:43 PM
Jay - it's dark because it's at night :wink: If I make it much brighter it no longer looks natural.

Nicolaus - you could try something like that, but you'd have to then remove all the star trails from the exposure with the clouds (a LOT of work). And then bringing in trails from an exposure where there were no clouds will look odd, as the clouds partially mask the stars. You could fake it a little, but at that point it would start to become a little too much photo art for me. Really the only way to do it naturally would be if you could get lucky and have just the right amount of clouds moving at moonset, and then naturally dissipating to a mostly clear sky. Unlikely... but not impossible.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Kory Lidstrom on December 3, 2010 at 4:20 PM
Ha! I was just in that very spot not three weeks ago.

You did a great job here, I like everything about it except perhaps for the streaked stars, but I know there's little one can do about that.

(BTW, sorry we just missed each other... again. One day we'll finally meet. :biggrin: )
Registered on November 19, 2008, 49 Posts, 1035 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on December 3, 2010 at 4:54 PM
Floris,

It seems I've seen this somewhere before? Kudos though for adding a new twist. The sky is awesome.

I don't think it's been mentioned... but at least for me I feel like I want more sky/stars and less bowl or the other way around. Then again, it's hard to go wrong with such a unique subject, and again you did well to capture and present this in your way.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Scott Smorra on December 3, 2010 at 10:13 PM
I've always been a big fan of your night photography Floris and this image really takes your work to a higher level. I love the clouds which are radiating out from the horizon with the moonlight behind them. The foreground tree and the star trails complete the image. It's amazing how different the image looks on your website compared to NPN. The black background is essential for these night shots.
Registered on November 2, 2009, 161 Posts, 2143 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on December 3, 2010 at 11:40 PM
awesome image, Floris! I do really like this as is. I can't imagine having the forethought to percieve this,and then come up with a way of doing it. For me, if the stars were points of light, that would be amazing. As is, I kind of wish the trails were bigger/longer. But I can see how that wouldn't work with the clouds though too.

Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on December 4, 2010 at 1:42 PM
I think it is very nice. :toast:

Although personally I don't think developing the web version "best for a relatively dark room" may be the best approach. Although monitors are getting so damn bright these days, maybe it IS the best approach... :smile:
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on December 4, 2010 at 5:18 PM
Neat! Im not really big on star trails, but it almost works for me here buy giving it the appearance of rain (nice that the streaks are oriented that way) :wavey:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Diggins on December 6, 2010 at 4:02 PM
Very cool...It looks so remote.
Registered on May 8, 2010, 4 Posts, 83 Comments