Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Backlit Bryce
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Backlit Bryce

by Mark Seaver

Gallery: LandscapePosted March 11, 2011478 views11 comments
Since I see from the forums that Richard Teller is heading for Southern Utah (an area that I love) I thought I post this image of Bryce from my files. This is a scan with an Epson V700 of a slide taken many years ago. However, unlike many of my slides it was taken this century. Viewed at 1:1, the scan has noticeable artifacts. I would especially like to hear from folks if they think this early morning view is good enough to warrant sending the scan out for a drum scan? Other comments are, of course welcome also.

Comments

11 comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on March 11, 2011 at 7:11 PM
Hi Mark what film did you use? Velvia? I have slides from the last century (Kodachrome and Ektachrome) that I scan with the V750 which is the same scanner but with MonacoEZcolor software. I still find it difficult to achieve correct color balance depending on the film. Some come out good and some don't. I have not had the time or stamina lately to set up the calibration for the films that don't have a profile on the Xrite website.. I would opt for a drum scan in this case. I have never had a drum scan done on my old film work but I am seriously thinking about it for a few of my favorites. I think it is worth it unless you have a lot of time to spend on color calibration of the scanner. I like the light and overall comp so I think it is worth it.

Here is one of my V750 scans that meet my expectations Portage Glacier (BTW - this was taken with a Mamiya 645 and Ektachrome professional slide film). Many other of my scanned images did not.
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on March 11, 2011 at 7:19 PM
Eva, This is on Ekatachrome VR. I spent a fair amount of time "playing" to get colors that I thought were reasonably accurate.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on March 11, 2011 at 7:36 PM
Quite an unearthly look here, Mark. My first reaction was that this must be a posting in the "Photo Art" gallery. I don't see the artifacts that you mention but I do appreciate that this image is quite different than I'm accustomed to seeing. The strange scenery and coloration is what strikes me the most. I'm not sure what a drum scan would accomplish here. Perhaps software post-processing could accomplish your aims? I find that there is just so much flexibility and variety being offered in various filters these days. Anyway, regarding this image, I like it as is. :toast:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on March 11, 2011 at 8:30 PM
The light is beautiful as is the view. Very nicely done
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on March 12, 2011 at 1:29 AM
Heavy on the purple side with blocked shadows Mark which is why I said Velvia. I have used the earlier Ektachrome Professional 100 and 200 ASA which were more on the blue side compared to Kodachrome which was more on the red side. Just communicating my film experience so please don't take this the wrong way.
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Richter on March 12, 2011 at 3:31 AM
Mark, your image has got a wonderful rich tonal range, I am shure it is worth to rework it with a drum scan. At least on my monitor, the magenta is a bit too intense. Anyway, a beautiful composition especially with the glow in the foreground!

Peter
Registered on November 10, 2010, 218 Posts, 2723 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on March 12, 2011 at 4:17 AM
I pretty much agree with the others regarding the quality of light and the colorcast. Pretty view!
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on March 14, 2011 at 7:32 AM
Looks very good to me Mark.
Have very little knowledge of the process, just like what I see.
Nicely done! :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Yeoh on March 14, 2011 at 9:38 AM
Mark:
This is beautiful landscape. Don't know anything about film scanning but the image is good and worth the extra effort to get it right.
Registered on September 1, 2009, 588 Posts, 8184 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Roane on March 15, 2011 at 2:39 PM
The composition works well here, and there is a nice glow on the closer formations. I have no knowledge of what you would get different from a drum scan, but as far as this image goes, it's very contrasty, and the many deep black holes in the image are distracting. Also the image, overall is pretty soft and the artifacts in the sky are quite noticable on the larger version
Registered on December 12, 2008, 213 Posts, 2226 Comments
Comment posted by Jared Ropelato on April 28, 2011 at 9:57 PM
really great layering here. So much to look at. Very nice.
Registered on March 1, 2011, 25 Posts, 204 Comments