Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Resonance and...
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Resonance and...

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted May 17, 2011366 views12 comments
Resonance and the Cute Factor

This post is partially in response to an exchange I had with Phil Hodgkins on my recent Humpback Whale post...something he said got me thinking...thanks Phil!

There's a darned good reason why many children's plush toys are modeled after bear cubs (those fluffy teddy bears) - the real McCoys are just so darned cute! And so, so full of personality...

I consider myself to be a conservation photographer first, and a wildlife photographer second. A lot of the wildlife images I shoot are destined for some form of use in conservation campaigns, either by selected conservation organizations or even sometimes "just" on my website. It's my belief that wildlife images CAN be effective in influencing public opinion on conservation issues, but only if the viewer somehow identifies with the subject. Another way of saying this (CAUTION...major buzzword alert!) is that the image has to strike a chord with viewer...it has to somehow resonate with them...they have to be able to relate to it, etc. I strongly believe if you are able to capture an animal's personality or an expression that elicits an emotive response in the viewer the image has a whole lot better chance of influencing their behaviour (including their support for a conservation initiative) than if the image is just an image "of a" critter.

I photographed this cute little grizzly bear in a region of the BC coast known as the Great Bear Rainforest. Just prior to snapping the shot the little devil had been amusing him/herself by chewing on those grass seed heads that it has corralled in its claws. I snagged some shots of it chewing on the seeds but waited (and, it seemed, waited and waited) until the cub looked up at me and, on some level, made contact with me. And that's when I captured this shot. I'm not sure exactly what this look and expression conveys to me (Coyness? Shyness? Curiosity?), but he/she is definitely pretty darned cute! And almost everyone I have shown this image to has reacted to it quite positively - and certainly much more positively than they do to the images of the cub chewing on the seed heads.

Can cuteness alone carry an image? I'm not sure there's a firm answer to that - there has to be SOME technical merit to the shot. This shot is OK technically but not what I would call outstanding. It IS sharp where it counts and there's an interesting triangular thing going on with the in-focus (vs. out-of-focus) elements (something Lon is sure to notice!). In a perfect world I'd prefer the background to be more out of focus and softer, but the short distance between the cub and the background left me with little control over the background. But most viewers (except image critiquers!) rarely get beyond the face and the cuteness! So...I think in this case, the image is technically strong enough but the cuteness factor tips the balance in favour of the image working.

A final comment on this image. I spent a LOT of time tweaking the mid-tone contrast on this image - particularly in the head and facial region - before it "came to life." And, when I think about it, I spend more time tweaking and adjusting the mid-tone contrast in my images more than I do on anything else. Sometimes - even often - I do it through blending exposure "versions" derived from multiple raw conversions (with different exposure settings). And, after I've got the midtones close to where I want with exposure blends, I often use a product called "Lightzone" to further "explore" the midtones of the image. So if I have a "secret" technique in my post-processing (which I have been accused of having and hoarding) it's this - careful attention to mid-tone contrast. Now I just have to remember not to tell anybody about that... :wink:

Subject: Brown Bear (Urus arctos) cub looking cute
Location: Great Bear Rainforest, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D3
Lens: Nikkor 600 mm f/4 VRII lens - handheld from floating Zodiac
Exposure: 1/200s at f5.6. ISO 400. -0.33 stop compensation from matrix metered exposure.
Crop: Full frame vertically (original capture horizontal) with about equal cropping off both sides

As usual, more info about the image (including more processing details, etc) available here on my website:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/.

Comments & critiques welcomed. Probably better to view larger version first...

Cheers...thanks for looking...

Brad

Comments

12 comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on May 17, 2011 at 10:13 PM
Brad,

The vegetation in front of the bear works because it is being clutched by the claw/paw so to me it becomes part of the image - rather than a distracting element. A very nice scene, though a touch centered for my tastes.
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Canuel on May 17, 2011 at 10:35 PM
Great look from this bear Brad and I really like the colors and triangle formed by the bear and FG grasses. The elbow resting on the rock is a nice addition to the relaxed feeling of this photo.
Registered on September 12, 2010, 53 Posts, 660 Comments
Comment posted by Anand Narayanan on May 18, 2011 at 12:59 AM
The resting of the hands on the rock makes the image ! I wouldnt mind loosing a bit of the bottom.

A little off topic :biggrin: You seem to spend quite a bit of time in the Great Bear Rainforest. Do you have any pics of coastal wolves :wink: Would love to see em.
Registered on October 25, 2009, 110 Posts, 835 Comments
Comment posted by Stephen Kaluski on May 18, 2011 at 9:11 AM
Brad they are adorable, but would soon turn into a handful very quickly. The pose & look is perfect with just the right amount of eye contact. Sharpness and calrity spot on considering the conditions/light and from where you were shooting from. Wouldn't lose anything at the foot of the image as you need the weight there.

Very interesting artical Brad, very informative, but is the software that much better in terms of control & detail compared to the almost same feature in PS, WDYT?

TFS
Steve

PS Might lift the way you present the techs if you don't mind. :wink:
Registered on March 25, 2007, 189 Posts, 1064 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on May 18, 2011 at 9:23 AM
I find this image high on cuteness factor! Very nice expressions and pose of the Bear. But I do find the BG somewhat distracting, as a result, Bear is probably not able to stand out. Just my two cents ...
Jagdeep Rajput
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Barbara Graham on May 18, 2011 at 10:12 AM
Brad, thank you for all that information. This image definitely works for me. The main thing that strikes me when I look at it is that it's not an image any less-than-professional photographer is likely to get. It's almost like an outdoor studio shot of a grizzly bear cub -- not an easy feat to accomplish. I love looking at it.
Registered on July 27, 2010, 1310 Posts, 5035 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on May 18, 2011 at 10:47 AM
Hey all,

Thanks for the feedback - a few responses:

1. Luke: re: "...though a touch centered for my tastes" - I experimented with an off-centre placement of the bear's head but this resulting in clipping of the rock, which didn't work for me. Trade-offs!

2. Anand: re: "Do you have any pics of coastal wolves?" Nope. Have heard them howling many times (including from VERY close by), but have never actually seen one out there (have seen and photographed lots of them closer to home, but not in the GBR).

3. Steve: re: "Might lift the way you present the techs if you don't mind." No problem - go for it.

4. Steve again: re: "...but is the software that much better in terms of control & detail compared to the almost same feature in PS". Both Lightroom and PS are critical in my workflow, but after much testing I won't use them for raw conversions (wish I could, would make my workflow MUCH smoother). In depth (long-winded) explanation available here, two critical sentences in that explanation are this: Can I get output similar to that of Capture One Pro when using Lightroom or Photoshop? Sometimes...but it's my experience that when using Lightroom it takes many more image adjustments (and about 3 times the number of "clicks") to get there.

5. Jagdeep: re: "But I do find the BG somewhat distracting". Yep, I agree - background not what I wish it was.

6. Barbara: re: "It's almost like an outdoor studio shot of a grizzly bear cub". Thanks - some may not like that look - lots of different tastes out there. MOST of that comes from the work on the mid-tone contrast...(that secret I won't reveal :wink: ).

Thanks again...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Billy Fairburn on May 18, 2011 at 1:53 PM
Hi Brad,

Nice image and interesting commentary as always. I do agree that the background isn't perfect but the cuteness more than makes up for it!

cheers for sharing,

Billy :wavey:
Registered on March 3, 2007, 123 Posts, 717 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on May 18, 2011 at 5:36 PM
This image really qualifies for the cuteness factor. A great portrait and an interesting dialouge.
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Joe James on May 18, 2011 at 10:25 PM
Brad,

Great shot and as always, great back story.
Registered on November 20, 2009, 89 Posts, 808 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on May 20, 2011 at 1:57 PM
The cuteness factor is definitely there for this portrait. The bear's look and eyes really make this image for me. You can tell he is in a somewhat playful mood. Good and interesting narrative to go with the picture and good things to think about. I appreciate you taking the time to give these and I always enjoy looking at the larger versions, great stuff and well done.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Jenaya Launstein on May 26, 2011 at 2:35 PM
That is one adorable little cub! I love the stare!
Registered on February 8, 2011, 254 Posts, 1302 Comments