Emerging
by Bruce King
Thanks for all the comments on my last image, they're always appreciated.
I posted this image awhile back with fairly straight forward processing. In this cropped version I've applied a few effects courtesy of NIK Color Efex. I was looking for a balance between the soft glow these filters can provide and still maintain a certain degree of sharpness. Similar to some of Pat's images I suppose but with a little of my own flair hopefully.
How does this work for you? I'm venturing into unexplored waters here so if you think it really blows feel free to say so. Also, a question for the moderators, how far can we take these software applications before they belong in the Photo Art Gallery?
Check out the larger version and thanks for looking.
Comments
14 commentsFor my tastes this is gorgeous but certainly has some of your flair. I particularly like the space around the flower in the image and the texture in the plant. I'd also say the balance between detail and softness is perfect - at least for me.
With regard to software and photo art, so long as your trying to process an image of flora to say something you want about the flora, I don't care what you do. Black and white and out of focus images are certainly not strictly representational of any flora I've seen in nature except in photographs. I guess in my view, the software just affords a lot more opportunity to control the image than traditional darkroom techniques did. Ram's abstracts, Nathan's crams, Bill's and Patricia's control of dof to isolate subjects from ground and create supporting bgs, Gigi's and Larry's processing and use of light, Ian's stacks, macro photography in itself all present renditions of flora that constitute art in my opinion - and are for the most part unlike anything we see in nature with or without are glasses on. The processing techniques don't really matter - what does is whether the subject is flora and whether the flora is central to the image. I honestly stay puzzled that we tend to think the techniques we use have anything to do with the gallery we post in.
I think Bill and David Kelly agree with this position. At least I believe they have in the past. If you guys see this and don't, please jump in.
pat
Nathan
Albert Darmo.
I like this image very much for the mode and excellent processing. The only minor nit are the two ?water droplets on the petal and on the bud in the RUC which looks a little artificial mostly due to processing I think.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
May