Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Emerging
‹ PreviousFlora GalleryNext ›

Emerging

by Bruce King

Gallery: FloraPosted May 27, 2011148 views14 comments
Thanks for all the comments on my last image, they're always appreciated.
I posted this image awhile back with fairly straight forward processing. In this cropped version I've applied a few effects courtesy of NIK Color Efex. I was looking for a balance between the soft glow these filters can provide and still maintain a certain degree of sharpness. Similar to some of Pat's images I suppose but with a little of my own flair hopefully.
How does this work for you? I'm venturing into unexplored waters here so if you think it really blows feel free to say so. Also, a question for the moderators, how far can we take these software applications before they belong in the Photo Art Gallery?
Check out the larger version and thanks for looking.

Comments

14 comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on May 27, 2011 at 12:44 PM
Bruce,

For my tastes this is gorgeous but certainly has some of your flair. I particularly like the space around the flower in the image and the texture in the plant. I'd also say the balance between detail and softness is perfect - at least for me.

With regard to software and photo art, so long as your trying to process an image of flora to say something you want about the flora, I don't care what you do. Black and white and out of focus images are certainly not strictly representational of any flora I've seen in nature except in photographs. I guess in my view, the software just affords a lot more opportunity to control the image than traditional darkroom techniques did. Ram's abstracts, Nathan's crams, Bill's and Patricia's control of dof to isolate subjects from ground and create supporting bgs, Gigi's and Larry's processing and use of light, Ian's stacks, macro photography in itself all present renditions of flora that constitute art in my opinion - and are for the most part unlike anything we see in nature with or without are glasses on. The processing techniques don't really matter - what does is whether the subject is flora and whether the flora is central to the image. I honestly stay puzzled that we tend to think the techniques we use have anything to do with the gallery we post in.

I think Bill and David Kelly agree with this position. At least I believe they have in the past. If you guys see this and don't, please jump in.

pat

Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Smith on May 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM
Bruce, this is stunning! I like this reaching out of the darkess with colors and glow. Painterly effect. I looked back at the original posting and this is a significant change...the two cannot be compared as they are in different classes, in my opinion. The mood created here has more artistry and vision...which makes me want to frame this before the other one. I am thinking the posting from 4/27 could also be subject to your application of the NIK tool...and I wouild like to see what you can do with it. Nicely done!
Registered on September 5, 2008, 449 Posts, 2444 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on May 27, 2011 at 2:55 PM
Very nice Bruce - very painterly. Love the rich, fully saturated colors, and excellent comp.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Buck on May 27, 2011 at 4:53 PM
I love the negative space, and the darkness Bruce. The processing is very nice. A great photo with great results.

Nathan
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1101 Posts, 13589 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on May 27, 2011 at 7:11 PM
Hi Bruce :wavey: Looks like your taking the path Pat uses, which is great! you pushed the envelope on exposure and processing!! which gives great dark color and intrigueing light :cool: :smile:
Albert Darmo.
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by David W. Kelly on May 27, 2011 at 7:35 PM
A very beautiful image Bruce. I agree with you 100% Pat. :toast:
Registered on October 7, 2005, 883 Posts, 6590 Comments
Comment posted by Craig Strand on May 27, 2011 at 7:38 PM
I think you achieved the "NIK" soft glow with a degree of sharpness that you were looking for. I also like the effect this gives, well done Bruce!
Registered on March 30, 2008, 416 Posts, 2885 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on May 27, 2011 at 9:12 PM
Very beautiful image. I love everything about it. Great job on the processing. :toast:
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Yeoh on May 27, 2011 at 10:25 PM
Bruce:
I like this image very much for the mode and excellent processing. The only minor nit are the two ?water droplets on the petal and on the bud in the RUC which looks a little artificial mostly due to processing I think.
Registered on September 1, 2009, 588 Posts, 8184 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on May 28, 2011 at 10:33 AM
That's just a beautiful work of art. Great lighting, color, background, and a romantic feel with your processing. :toast:
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Anne K. Rusk on May 29, 2011 at 12:11 AM
I really like everything you did here. All of your decisions on processing work for me. I really like how it all fades to black! The softness is a great touch and the sharpness is not compromised at all, IMO. The only MINOR thing I would consider is a slight bit of fill light in the center of the flower so it doesn't reach the same level of black as the background. Exceptional image!
Registered on October 10, 2010, 65 Posts, 904 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on May 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM
Beautiful. :toast:

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by May Haga on May 30, 2011 at 2:05 PM
This works exceptionally well Bruce. Love how the open bloom pops out and grabs its rightful share of the attention,
May
Registered on February 22, 2007, 714 Posts, 8470 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on May 30, 2011 at 10:35 PM
Love the light and black bg. Works for me :toast:
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments