A rose
by Luke Ormand
I had stopped at a riverside site to see if birds were around but couldn't find anything but as I was leaving I noticed this single rose.
Nikon D300s 105 mm f/2.8 VR HH
f/7.1
1/1250s
ISO 640
-.33 EC
Cropped to 79%, sharpened in CS5 on 27" iMac
- Luke
P.S. I finally bought a tripod but the head I have wasn't cooperating (isn't really designed for shooting without tripod feet anyway) so any suggestions for (inexpensive but good) heads would be appreciated.
Comments
6 commentsThe rose is beautiful but the lighting is a little harsh with strong shadow. Good bg separation. Also wish the leaf in the LLC did not cross the lower edge of the petals. A square crop would work well here too.
I am quite happy with my Manfrotto 486RC ballhead. Not too bulky and reasonable price. Good enough for the 300F4 which I use for dragonflies but probably not sturdy enough for longer lens.
I agree with Gary's comments on the image. The shadow is a little too dominant in this for my tastes.
I have a RRS BH40 that I'm very pleased with and have used for about three years now. One of the best pieces of gear I own and I use it constantly. I think it's the only photographic gear I own that has literally never had a problem. It's fairly expensive though.
pat
These wild roses smell great (compared to the commercial hybrid variety which only look great) - back home in India we prepare a sugary syrup kind of thing with these wild rose petals added. Supposed to have a cooling effect on the body (so says the tradition).
I use a Really Right Stuff BH55 Ballhead - they are beautifully engineered and I am very happy with it. I hear good things about Kirk and Markins Ballheads also.
Albert Darmo