Totally Hung!
I was going to call this image "From Lemons to Lemonade" but thought the title I chose more aptly described the situation I was in when I shot this. And, of course, it's possible many may think this image IS a lemon and not sweet at all, so the "Lemons to Lemonade" title might have been a little presumptuous! Oh...and at least one other connotation of the phrase "Totally Hung" exists and was NOT lost on me - but this is a PG rated website and this is a FEMALE bear - so don't go there!
Have you ever been in the situation where you're faced with a great scene but are totally hung with the wrong configuration of gear in your hands? Most of us have - and that's exactly what happened when I shot this image. I captured this shot from the front of a Zodiac boat during a photo tour I was leading in the Khutzeymateen in late May 2011. Just moments before shooting this I was doing the "intrepid guide" thing and had got out of the Zodiac to lift and push it off some rocks. When I freed the boat I had to jump/dive in and so I ended up in the front of the Zodiac and all my camera gear at the BACK of the boat. Someone handed me my camera, which was fitted with a 400mm lens with rear-mounted polarizer installed. But all the rest of my camera was stowed at the back of the boat - way out of my reach. And...just moments later we were face-to-face with a female grizzly close enough to us that a 200mm lens would have been ample for a full frame shot. The bear was in the shade. I couldn't move around in the boat so changing lenses (or even pulling of my polarizer) was out of the question. What to do?
Well - all I COULD do was live with what I had in my hands. So it was portrait time! The bear was so close that I was in a situation where the head pretty much filled the frame with my 400mm lens. Which meant I had to stop down a fair bit to get all the critical bits into focus. And, because I was hand-holding the camera I needed some shutter speed to get a sharp image. And I had a light-sucking polarizing filter on. So...it was f6.3, 1/250s, and...6400 ISO! Well...pixels are cheap so why not try? This is the result...
What drove the conversion to Black & White (B&W)? I commonly hear folks say "well, this image had poor colour in it so I converted to black & white." I look at things a little differently when it comes to B&W. I LIKED how this image came out in colour, but when I looked at it critically I saw a very wide tonal range (some true blacks, some whites or near whites) AND a whole zone of nearly continuous mid-tones (in the bear's fur). Which made me think there was the potential for a strong B&W image in all that colour. Being more direct...I think it's often a mistake to take a mid-tone dominated image with "poor" colour and think it will work better in B&W - the end result is often a drab, grey-on-grey image with little to draw one's eye. You want good B&W images? Forget the images that "don't look good in colour" - watch for wide tonal ranges and look for an image with GOOD colour in it!
Finally - a while back I mentioned I liked shooting what I call "active portraits" - fairly "tight" shots where the subject is doing more than just sitting there and the resulting image conveys a little about the animal's "personality". This would be another example of what I meant.
Subject: Female Grizzly Bear (
Urus arctos) giving me some face time!
Location: Khutzeymateen Inlet - Great Bear Rainforest, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D3s
Lens: Nikkor 400 mm f/2.8 VRII lens - handheld from floating Zodiac
Exposure: 1/250s at f6.3. ISO 6400. -0.33 stop compensation from matrix metered exposure.
Crop: About 85% of full frame
As usual, more info about the image (including more processing details for colour and B&W versions, etc) available here on my website:
http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/detail_2.html.
Any feedback welcome - and appreciated! I'm particularly interested in whether or not you have a preference for one version over the other (colour vs. B&W).
Cheers...thanks for looking...
Brad
PS: Yes - totally wild bear...
Comments
13 commentsCheers...
Brad
Inspiring as usual! Although I love both images I prefer the B&W- I feel it makes you pay more attention to the texture of the fur, and I think it also draws the viewer to the bear's eyes (not sure why it would as they are the same image, but thats just my take on it...) And I completely agree on the B&W conversion- a boring color image is typically going to make a boring (and grey) B&W!
-Cam
PS: And by the way, if you ever want an assistant on one of those photo tours, keep me in mind!
Great image both ways, but I think that I prefer the colour one.
Two things I'd be interested to know:
1. At ISO 6400, even with the D3 (which I suspect is top of the range Nikon) I would imagine you had at least some grain running through the image. If this was the case, what kind of noise reduction to you run to get rid of it and maintain such a high level of detail?
2. Assuming that this fine image is one that you'd make available for sale, would you show potential customers both versions or only the B&W? And if only the B&W, what is your line of reason for this?
Again, some very good questions. Hopefully my answers measure up:
1. Noise issue: This was shot with a D3s (not a D3) - only reason I mention that is that while the D3 is a very good low light (high ISO) camera, the D3s is a lot better. And it is Nikon's top-performing camera with respect to ISO performance.
No noise reduction beyond the minor amount done "automatically" by my raw converter. And, even if I over-rode this and set noise reduction to zero, the image would look no different at this size.
2. Selling strategy: B&W only, colour only, or both? Personally (and despite the comments of others above) I far prefer the B&W version of this image. I have many portraits of grizzlies as good or better than this in colour, but to my eye this is the one that converts best to B&W. For this reason if I made this image available for sale as a print I would do so in B&W only - basically for the uniqueness factor (within my own collection) and why offer this in a colour version only to have it compete with my other colour portraits (of grizzlies)? And, as a business-person, I'm never in love of carrying excess inventory...
If I missed anything feel free to ask away!
Cheers...
Brad
Wow! I wish my 7D could handle noise the way your D3s does!!!
Your rationale in line with my second question makes perfect sense. Again, many thanks for sharing.