Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Curiosity
‹ PreviousPhoto Art GalleryNext ›

Curiosity

by Steve Balke

Gallery: Photo ArtPosted July 22, 201186 views8 comments
I happened to look to the left of the path and there was this deer staring at me with such big beautiful eyes. It was surrounded by so much vegetation that I could not quite manage to make this a clear shot. I'll post the original photo below as Image 2 so you can see what I mean.

For the above image, Image 1, I used CS5 to prune specific interfering plants in the image. I then split the image into two parts: deer and bg. I found it necessary to use Remask 3 to accomplish the selection of the deer. I then used Painter 12 on each part with some help from CS5 to adjust contrast and exposure as well as retouching. I applied a light sandy pastel paper texture too.

In addition to providing a clearer view of the deer, I tried to make the look of the animal less contrasty and the vegetation less attention getting.

I came very close to retaining the photographed processed image of the deer alone without modification by Painter 12 with only the bg modified. I'll post that below too as Image 3. I really like the detail in the photographic image.

I was surprised to see the high ISO of this image and traced it to a recent change that I made in one of the software switches in the 1D Mark IV (C.Fn I-8: Safety shift (iso)). The camera decided that correct autoexposure could not be obtained without increasing ISO to 4000. That's too much for me: I've now disabled the switch. I decided not to apply NR to this image since it was to be used for Photo Art. However, noise is really only apparent in the bg anyway.

All comments most welcome.

1D Mark IV, 400 mm f/5.6, 1.4x TC, hand held: ISO 4000, 1/1000 s, f/9, 0 EV, 9.8 MP (61% of 16 MP full frame), exposure adjustment, sharpening.

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on July 22, 2011 at 2:37 PM
Image 2: The Original Image (unprocessed)
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on July 22, 2011 at 2:38 PM
Image 3: Painterly bg, Deer Photograph (processed)
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Barbara Graham on July 23, 2011 at 1:00 AM
Steve, what beautiful colors! Even with (or maybe because of) all your work, you ended up with an image very close to the original, and it's beautiful. I think I would consider also removing the stalk/pine needle/whatever it is across the right ear of the deer (to the left of the image) and the vegetation directly in front of the deer at the bottom of the image. This must have been a really special experience.
Registered on July 27, 2010, 1310 Posts, 5035 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on July 23, 2011 at 8:51 AM
Nice job Steve, like your last rework best.
I might consider pulling the blue down slightly, and/or warming it a bit?
Good job with the "surgical" cloning work too..
Like that BG effect, a great looking portrait.
Have a nice weekend! :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by David W. Kelly on July 23, 2011 at 11:13 PM
I cast my vote for the last rework. Beautiful color palette. Nice capture.
Registered on October 7, 2005, 883 Posts, 6590 Comments
Comment posted by Barb Pflaum on July 24, 2011 at 2:48 PM
I prefer image 3. The deer's beautiful eyes show up better than in image 1 and your have the beautiful painterly bg.
Registered on January 14, 2009, 316 Posts, 2724 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on July 24, 2011 at 6:24 PM
I think all three images are pretty special but #3 gets my vote. There's a softness (the good kind) to it that seems to add to the impact and those eyes are killer. Nicely done
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on July 25, 2011 at 5:55 PM
Thank you all very much for your comments: looks like Image 3 is the winner! As you will see, because of your comments, in my next post (a Monarch Butterfly) I've decided to work on bg for awhile before delving into the main subject with my painting efforts! I too prefer that: painting is supposed to omit photographic detail (according to what I've read). However, I think that we all miss the detail in the the subjects I've been photographing. Maybe as my painting style improves I can somehow offset the loss. However, that's not the case at present! :wink:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments