Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Northern Parula
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Northern Parula

by Geoff Powell

Gallery: AvianPosted May 15, 2012211 views15 comments
One of the more gregarious chaps, the somewhat ubiquitous northern parula is only slightly behind the redstart in my warbler favs. I've had these little tykes eating and drinking inches from me. The only other wild birds that have gotten that close are scrub jays and sandhill cranes. I just love their personality.

Thanks for the comments on my redstart. I hope you enjoy this little guy.

FD: unlike my redstart bg, there was a leaf cloned out of the lower left corner on this one, about the size of the leaf in the upper left, but it had some corrosion on it so it was aesthetically unpleasant and I removed it.

Comments

15 comments
Comment posted by Rick Turner on May 15, 2012 at 11:19 PM
Great pose and back ground..
Registered on February 18, 2012, 534 Posts, 2755 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on May 15, 2012 at 11:48 PM
A very cute capture of the warbler, Geoff. The exposure is quite good and the background is good. The only nit I have is there is a bit less detail in the face and back than I would expect. Without your shooting data, it's hard to tell if it is a result of the camera settings or a post-processing issue.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on May 16, 2012 at 12:04 AM
The pose and bg are great here Geoff, to my eye the bird looks a bit overflashed. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Geoff Powell on May 16, 2012 at 7:32 AM
Nate, if you wouldn't mind can you explain what you mean by over-flashed? This was a situation where the only light on the bird was the flash at 1/16 power with -2/3 fc. He was on the edge of a very thick wood where there was zero ambient light based on the background exposure I needed (which was fully sunlit). To me the exposure on the bird is spot on, but I'm wondering what you are referring to.

Jim, I sympathize. I left the D4 at camp and brought the D7000 to save a little weight on this 20mile bike excursion. I didn't know there would be so little light. The d7000 just couldn't keep up on focus a lot of time. In this instance I had to hit the center body, which I thought would be ok because he was sideways, but he isn't really sideways and it front focused a bit (the back end of the bird is super sharp but the front end is just at the fuzzy end of the DOF).
Registered on March 20, 2012, 21 Posts, 170 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on May 16, 2012 at 8:43 AM
Delightful little fellow! Great pose and eye, lovely volours, and nice BG.
Sandy
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on May 16, 2012 at 9:23 AM
Geoff, to my eye the bird looked a little bit bright and the feathers look as though they have been flashed they have a shiny look to them. You didn't include your techs, so I was guessing as to what your flash settings may have been. If you needed to use that much flash to get the image then great, it's just the flash work was quite obvious to me and ideally I think it would have been more subtle. When shooting fill flash I'm usually at -1.3 FEC or lower. It's a nice, sharp image of this species.
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond Klassen on May 16, 2012 at 5:25 PM
Cool pose and a nice background. Nice shot!
Registered on November 30, 2008, 114 Posts, 790 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on May 16, 2012 at 9:08 PM
Nice shot of this parula and nice clean bg. I like the pose and detail on the bird.
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on May 16, 2012 at 10:42 PM
Excellent pose, bg and composition, Geoff. The bird looks a bit oversharpened to my eye and almost has a flash look. Could you post your shooting parameters?

:toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on May 16, 2012 at 10:43 PM
I really like the pose you have caught and the overall image. I enjoyed the comments from a critique and learn standpoint.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on May 17, 2012 at 3:39 AM
A great bird and pose Geoff. Looks like you did well with the conditions you were forced to work in.

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Geoff Powell on May 17, 2012 at 8:58 AM
Hi Dennis, the small image is a bit over sharpened. I usually reduce from the original and apply sharpening, but I accidentally reduced from the already sharpened 1200px image and sharpened again. I wasn't unduly concerned because the 1200px image is right on IMHO. The parameters are f4.5 1/250 ISO 400. flash 1/16 -2/3 All manual as usual. Since the exposure on the bird seems perfect to me, reducing the flash exposure was just not possible for without it the bird was a near complete silhouette.
Registered on March 20, 2012, 21 Posts, 170 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on May 18, 2012 at 7:57 AM
A nice shot Geoff. I can tell it was flashed, but I like the results. Not a flash user, so I learned something from this critique.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Geoff Powell on May 18, 2012 at 3:39 PM
Thanks all.

Hi Ron, I saw your print hanging in Lighthouse yesterday. Well done. I'm glad you had some success there. I only use flash when in the deep woods generally in order to bring out the feather detail lost in the absence of high quality light. I just can't seem to get it to work with the indigo bunting though. I'll post an image just to scare the heck out of everyone. lol. His colors are so iridescent the image just glows and no amount of saturation or other color adjustment seems to work well for me with that bird if flashed. I also don't like flashing owls sometimes as it can mess with their awesome eyes. It's a balance between micro-contrast feather detail that happens with flash (amazing detail enhancement) and some of the counter productive side effects that have to be fixed in post (like steel eye). It can be a mixed blessing for BIF as well because if your flash is faster than your shutter (assuming a certain level of power) and the ambient is high enough to expose the subject you'll get all kinds of ghosts (which can produce nice artistic effects if that was intended or make you want to throw up if unintentional lol). All the best.
Registered on March 20, 2012, 21 Posts, 170 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on June 6, 2012 at 11:59 PM
Super pose, fine detail, and nice BG - very nice image!
Sandy
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments