While camping a couple of weeks ago, I wanted to capture the sense of wonder viewing the stars in a moonless sky on a remote lake. The view I wanted was immense, and I didn't have a fast lens as short as I needed, so I ended up stitching multiple images shot at ISO 5000. With noise reduction both in-camera and in post-processing, it actually came out pretty well. I think the fact that the file is about 50 megapixels mitigates the high ISO.
I used my headlamp for light painting since the campfire was not bright enough, but I wanted that campfire feel, so I warmed up the foreground colors closer to the ground.
NOTE: Please comment on the LARGER version. I brightened the smaller one just a bit in an attempt to keep the thumbnail from going completely black. (Didn't help, so I know this won't get many views) I guess it's obvious that I am not a fan of those "fantasy" night shots that look like the stars are shining impossibly unrealistically bright at twilight. It was a dark night, and that's what I am trying to portray.
ADDENDUM: After the first comment, I changed the title from "Wonder" to "Wonder What This Is?"
Canon 5DII
Canon 24-105
15 sec. @ f/4; ISO 5000
6 frames stitched in CS5
Comments
8 commentsI should have realized that this picture is so dark, I would have to describe what's out there in the black void! (Reminds me of a relative who had to explain "Here's a picture of Uncle Leo -- the flash bulb didn't work so good, but that white spot is the shine on his glasses.)
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT (if there were any light):
The guy in the picture said I perfectly captured the scene and mood, but I guess you had to be there. That's him sitting on a floating dock on an island in an Adirondack lake that is 60 miles from the nearest city. He is admiring the stars on a moonless night. My yellow canoe is tied to the dock, and that's a white pine tree standing up on the right side. The long exposure apparently captures some lingering atmospheric light. I know that because the gas station at Blue Mt. Lake (the only business with outside lights in the village eight miles away) closes at 9PM, and it did not catch fire; it was still there two days later on the way home. There weren't even any other campfires in that direction. (We were the first campers of the year on that lake; not exactly one of those places where you have to wait in line to get a spot for your tripod, but we like it.)
Now I know why other people make night pictures so bright; it avoids writing a description of what's there in the dark!
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
I like what you've done here Wayne, if only for your bravery in doing it. However, I think it would have helped to have some dusk detail in the FG, which wouldn't have been difficult with a blend from an earlier shot. I agree with your comment on starfields: bright stars in during what seems to be a shot taken during the day looks alien and ridiculous, in this particular forum anyway.