Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Egret Action
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Egret Action

by Steve Balke

Gallery: AvianPosted July 5, 2012112 views14 comments
This Snowy Egret was in Cuba, near Holguin, in February 2012. It presented a beautiful sight on very still water. I find it curious how much darker than the bird is the reflection.

All comments welcome.

1D Mark IV, 400 mm f/5.6, hand held: ISO 1250, 1/1000s, f/13, 0 EV (Manual), image is 8.5 MP (53% of the 16 MP of the 1DMk4), minor NR, exposure adjustment, sharpening)

Comments

14 comments
Comment posted by Rick Turner on July 5, 2012 at 7:09 PM
Spectacular Steve. Two thumbs up. :toast:
Registered on February 18, 2012, 534 Posts, 2755 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Hahn on July 5, 2012 at 9:02 PM
Steve,

Incredible picture. I like the water dripping. :smile:
Registered on August 16, 2007, 14 Posts, 151 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Ramy on July 5, 2012 at 9:46 PM
Steve,
Great Pic . . .
The darker reflection is because in the reflection you are looking up at the Egret and are seeing the shadows of the light on the actual bird. There are also features of the Egret you see on the underside of the bird in the refection you do not see on the actual bird. The water trail drops are also darker because they are reflecting the light differently in the reflection. The reflection in this picture is so perfect that it works almost as well rotating the picture 180 degrees. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on June 16, 2012, 567 Posts, 2809 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on July 5, 2012 at 10:10 PM
Steve: I like this image with the complete reflection. The water drops really add a lot to the image. The exposure looks pretty good. The whites are not blown based on looking at the histogram. There doesn't seem to be a lot of detail in the white plumage however. Was noise reduction applied to the entire image?
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on July 5, 2012 at 10:45 PM
Thank you, everyone. I love this image myself. So, I'm glad that you all do too. Mike, thank you for the info on the dark reflection. Very interesting analysis. You have me rotating the image on my computer!
Keith, regarding detail, my usual procedure is to apply Topaz DeNoise 5 to the image. I normally use the very lowest raw format setting. It is smart enough to apply NR differently to different parts of the image: notably highlights, shadows, colors, etc. At the lowest setting there is barely any change. After I saw your comment I went back and compared the raw image to the final processed version looking for smearing of detail. I could see none and the final version has better detail than the raw, unprocessed original. I think that your comment is a good one though. It's been awhile since I examined final processed results with and without NR. I'll start to pay attention to it again. :wink:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on July 6, 2012 at 12:54 AM
Really good image Steve. I love the action, the flying water and of course the reflection is top notch.
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on July 6, 2012 at 1:44 AM
Exquisite, Steve.

I'm wondering why you don't select the bird, an easy task in CS5 or later, invert the selection, and then apply NR?
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Craig Myers on July 6, 2012 at 2:23 AM
Gorgeous reflection photo. The implied action with the frozen water drops is like frosting on the cake.
Registered on September 1, 2008, 85 Posts, 757 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on July 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM
Thank you, everyone. Jim, in answer to your question about selection for NR: My usual workflow uses Topaz Denoise. That software has various ways of tailoring NR to different parts of the image if necessary. If that doesn't work then I'd likely go to Dfine (Nik Software) and use control points. Finally, if I'm still not happy I could use Photoshop selection (as you mention) and concentrate on a specific region. There was so little noise in this image that a light application of Denoise was all that I considered necessary.
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Wolfe on July 6, 2012 at 7:44 AM
What an absolutely awesome photo. I just LOVE it:)
Registered on April 7, 2012, 42 Posts, 103 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on July 6, 2012 at 12:12 PM
Wonderful action, it's definitely a keeper Steve.
I've read through the chain, and have nothing to add..
Just a pleasure to view, beautiful work! :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Leggett on July 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM
Nicely done, Steve. Could use just a hair of CCW rotation. I agree with Mike's assessment of the darker reflection. At a lower angle to the bird this difference would not have been as pronounced.
Registered on July 21, 2004, 706 Posts, 3233 Comments
Comment posted by Ray Whitt on July 6, 2012 at 2:42 PM
Wonderful pose and reflection, love the water droplets. Excellent work.

Ray
Registered on May 27, 2011, 92 Posts, 2619 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on July 7, 2012 at 4:40 AM
Great action you captured here Steve!!! The splash ring and reflection are sweet. Excellent composition too.

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments