Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Fine-Tuning Frequency
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Fine-Tuning Frequency

by Tony Kuyper

Gallery: LandscapePosted July 21, 20123,023 views22 comments
I really appreciate the comments on my last post. Floris' was very instructive:
The hues are being pulled apart and purified by other parts of your workflow, and the result is similar to an increase in saturation.

Makes sense. Extreme processing can sometimes lead to a preponderance of Photoshop's primary colors—red, green, blue, cyan, magenta, yellow. Once you get to these "pure" colors, they start to look saturated in the image regardless of their actual saturation values. That would provide a very good explanation of why the colors in that image were perceived as saturated even though their saturation was relatively low.

For this image the effort was directed towards NOT letting the colors go so "pure" during processing. Out of deference to some previous comments, I won't show the RAW image or go into processing detail except to say that the goal was to once again enhance some subtle colors but to do so in a way that looks more natural.

Would be interested in your thoughts as to how this is working for you.

5D2, 28-300@209, f/16, 0.6 sec, ISO 100, six focus-blended images.

Comments

22 comments
Comment posted by Peter Coskun on July 21, 2012 at 3:26 AM
I always think these look natural. Having never stepped foot on this landscape I could never tell. Rocks and minerals do strange things in certain light, but in the end it's art, and the way the colors flow with the patterns is always top notch.
Registered on October 31, 2011, 170 Posts, 1240 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on July 21, 2012 at 3:51 AM
Another great color festival with a rock solid composition. And I agree with your color observations - the effect of a color or its strength depends on its neighbours. Just look at grey - grey is only grey amongst greys :)
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Olsen on July 21, 2012 at 8:24 AM
Tony,

This one does look more natural to my eyes that your last post, and what a feast of color and design you've captured.
Nicely done!
Registered on October 19, 2006, 306 Posts, 1571 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on July 21, 2012 at 9:38 AM
Stunning, as always. I love these abstracts and envy your mastery of this element. The flow of crests leading through this scene is as powerful as it is graceful and the colors are excellent. Very nicely done.
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Jorne de Bruin on July 21, 2012 at 10:16 AM
I'm always amazed at the colours of the earth youportray so well, this version looks very nice!
Registered on June 26, 2008, 178 Posts, 2136 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Budliger on July 21, 2012 at 10:26 AM
It's wonderful, the comp is perfect and the range of colors is mesmerizing.

Having not seen your last post, nor having any idea how you processed and specifically what part of the image Floris was referencing, I'm wondering about something I've noticed when using your actions and how it may have contributed to an "over saturated" appearance. When using the luminosity mask actions for curves and levels the default blending mode remains at normal which can and often does affect color. I've noticed that the cumulative effect of several layers can often introduce a strong boost in color, when the intended purpose of the layer may have just been for adjusting contrast, exposure or the like. Obviously this can be corrected by switching the blend mode to luminosity. Not sure if that's the issue but I thought I'd throw it out there...
Registered on June 11, 2006, 113 Posts, 2116 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on July 21, 2012 at 11:08 AM
Layers and layers of incredible texture and colors. The colors appear richer and less vibrant than others I've seen from you. Still as beautiful, but different. Another fascinating study, Tony. :toast:
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on July 21, 2012 at 11:20 AM
Interesting.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on July 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM
This is really nice, Tony. I like your comp here a lot and love these colors. Wasn't sure how to describe it but I think Morris did. The colors have a wonderful rich look but not as vibrant as the other one. It looks like it could be quite natural to me (at least it feels that way) and yet I have never been there. Beautiful work however I look at it... :smile:

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on July 21, 2012 at 4:22 PM
Kurt—It depends on the type of mask used and the type of adjustment made through the mask. Here's my thinking on this.

First off, any adjustment in Normal blending mode that has the same effect as increasing the curve's slope (making it more vertical and less horizontal) on a Curves adjustment layer (example: an S-curve) also increases saturation in those tones where the slope of the curve is increased . This is generally the mid-tones with an S-curve. A simple bowing of the curve up or down can have a variable effect. In some parts of the bowed curve the slope is increased and in the other parts it is decreased. So depending on which tones are revealed by the luminosity mask and where the bowing occurs, saturation can be increased or decreased depending on whether the curve slope is increased or decreased in the revealed tones.

By isolating and blending specific tonal ranges, luminosity masks can sometimes allow for more extreme adjustments on adjustment layers. If these more extreme adjustment include a slope-increasing curve in tones revealed by the layer's luminosity mask, then the there will be increased saturation in these tones. This is commonly the case when doing an S-curve adjustment through a mask that selects mid-tone values.

The advantage of using luminosity masks is that they allow targeting of specific tones and then seamlessly feather the adjustment to these tones into the surrounding pixels. To some degree, this ability to target specific tones is part of the reason that more extreme adjustments are possible. By confining an adjustment to just the mid-tones, for example, it's possible spare the delicate light and dark tones from accidentally being included in the selection and subsequently being over-adjusted. In other words, a more "severe" mid-tone adjustment is now possible since these non-mid-tone values are excluded from the tones that actually get adjusted.

What this means in practical terms is that larger increases in the curve's slope through tones selected by the mask will cause correspondingly larger increases in saturation, which is likely the situation you're describing, and yes, I think the effect would probably accumulate if the curve's slope is increased on multiple adjustment layers. In my experience this is most noticeable when increasing contrast through masks that target mid-tone values.

You are correct that changing the blending mode of the adjustment layer to "Luminosity" negates the saturation increase compared to what happens in "Normal" blending mode. However, this change-to-Luminosity-blending-mode solution generally only produces pleasing results with small adjustments. Too extreme of an adjustment and the images seems to start wanting more saturation, and Luminosity blending mode allows none.

So it's sometimes necessary to try to find the right balance, especially when doing more extreme or repetitive adjustments. While I generally deal with saturation (and vibrance) using Hue/Sat adjustment layers, I'll sometimes address the situation by "splitting" the Curves adjustment if I'm getting a saturation increase in "Normal" blending mode that looks excessive. This is done by simply duplicating the Curves adjustment layer, setting the opacity of both the original and duplicate layers to 50% (at least initially), and changing the blending mode on one of the layers to "Luminosity" while leaving the other set to "Normal." This splits the adjustment so saturation can be taken into account a little better. Both layers adjust brightness and contrast, but saturation can also be adjusted somewhat by varying the opacity of the two layers—higher opacity of the "Normal" layer increases saturation and lower opacity leaves it more unchanged. And while the original idea in this split was to have the opacities of the two layers add up to 100%, this really becomes a matter of personal preference. Once the split is done, it's up to the photographer to decide what looks best.

Hope that makes a little sense. It seems to work much easier in actual practice than when writing it all out.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on July 21, 2012 at 6:16 PM
I think it is very beautiful Tony. I do think saturation could be pulled back slightly without harming the presentation.

Also, if colors are well corrected (white balance and overall color balance) and an image is brought into PS a little mute (or even a lot) the use of advanced LAB color variation sometimes does wonders to break apart similar colors. A lot of people don't know that RGB renders a lot of similar colors the same. Breaking them apart goes a LONG WAY in landscape where color variation is so important. Dan margulis' man from mars technique is one way.
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Bret Edge on July 21, 2012 at 7:38 PM
I couldn't care less whether it's natural or not - either way it's stunning. The colors are obviously quite spectacular but I'm also really enjoying the interesting textures and patterns in the badlands. This is another exquisite image, Tony.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 711 Posts, 6363 Comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on July 22, 2012 at 3:38 AM
Another fine composition Tony. I prefer this one compared to your last one. This one seems to have flatter light and allows me to really get involved with the textures without being dazzled by the color. Perhaps the flatter light has also muted the colors a little here, which I really like :smile:
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on July 22, 2012 at 4:15 AM
I like the variation of colors, the color patterns and the layers in this image compared to some of your more recent images, way to go.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Tom Haxby on July 22, 2012 at 11:07 AM
What I really like are the lines and the texture.
Registered on July 6, 2006, 126 Posts, 647 Comments
Comment posted by Oleg Kuchorenko on July 22, 2012 at 2:57 PM
looks interesting..
Registered on July 2, 2012, 9 Posts, 111 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on July 22, 2012 at 9:15 PM
I really like the abstraction that you get with all of the subtle (and not so subtle) colors that you pull out. There's great eye flow here both from the color changes and from the series of ridges.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Danny Laureys on July 22, 2012 at 10:11 PM
Beautifull :toast: :toast:
Registered on January 5, 2008, 590 Posts, 1261 Comments
Comment posted by Alister Benn on July 23, 2012 at 8:45 AM
Nobody does it better... superb Tony...
Registered on June 9, 2011, 23 Posts, 258 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on July 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM
You are indeed the master of these types of images Tony. I love your composition as well as the details and color. As usual, this really rocks.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Drew M Wright on July 23, 2012 at 6:14 PM
Tony, in the end this is your vision regardless of color composition etc. I personally think you made a great capture and like the saturation used. Only suggestion would be to print this one big!
Registered on June 18, 2008, 23 Posts, 106 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seawell on July 27, 2012 at 2:42 AM
Tony, what does this puppy look like as a B&W?? I think it would be pretty cool to see :wink:
Registered on December 5, 2011, 197 Posts, 237 Comments