Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Naturally Painted
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Naturally Painted

by Howard Cheek

Gallery: AvianPosted July 31, 2012245 views18 comments
Painted Bunting again. I processed differently than I usually do for the web.
I added a very small measure of NR globally and adjusted image size to 1024px. Then I simply saved Bi-cubic sharper at the NPN limit. This process keeps the meta-data attached for anyone interested.
No added saturation, just some great early morning light.
F/6.3, 1/500th, ISO 640, 1D M3, 300mm f/2.8 + 1.4x ext, no flash.

Comments

18 comments
Comment posted by Mike Milicia on July 31, 2012 at 12:55 PM
Nice light, excellent pose and wonderful setting!
Registered on July 25, 2005, 145 Posts, 302 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Ramy on July 31, 2012 at 1:01 PM
Howard,
I really like this shot, Natural and with a very real feel, the foreground and background are very nice and compliment the Bunting well. Thanks for the Tech talk - lesson. :toast:
Registered on June 16, 2012, 567 Posts, 2809 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Turner on July 31, 2012 at 1:14 PM
Thanks for the processing details. Another beauty Howard :toast:
Registered on February 18, 2012, 534 Posts, 2755 Comments
Comment posted by David Haynes on July 31, 2012 at 1:37 PM
What a beauty Howard. Terrific colors and superbly processed. Everything blends seamlessly. Love the title. :toast:
Registered on February 20, 2010, 110 Posts, 1511 Comments
Comment posted by Roger Leekam on July 31, 2012 at 3:17 PM
Beautiful artistic work again, Howard. Iguess I'm a fiend for cropping. I would take some off the bottom here.
Registered on May 28, 2009, 83 Posts, 646 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on July 31, 2012 at 6:00 PM
Hi Roger,
I can't take more off the bottom without changing the entire comp.
I suppose I could compose square, but that would not leave me as much resolution..This was shot vertically.
I compose in standard print ratio's - i.e. 4:5. 2:3, etc.
It's a good idea to do it this way, because when it comes time to print, you don't have to recompose or chop-off some of the image after the fact..
Capiche? :smile:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by S Govindarajan on July 31, 2012 at 8:39 PM
Another exceptional image, Howard. I am always amazed at the color of this bird. No issues with your post processing. :toast:
Registered on April 19, 2008, 115 Posts, 1921 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on July 31, 2012 at 8:50 PM
Always a nice looking bird. And always a surprise at how they can still blend into the foliage.

A couple of comments/questions motivated by your notes:

1. If you shoot in raw and convert with Adobe Camera Raw then it shouldn't matter what "picture style" you have set on the camera. That's only used for in-camera processing of jpegs as far as I know. With Nikons if you use their conversion software (Nikon Capture) then the picture parameters (saturation, sharpening, etc.) are used in the raw conversion. I don't know about Canon's raw converion application but would expect it to act as Nikon does.

2. My philosophy is that the subject dictates the composition; not the aspect ratio of general purpose frames. I too would crop the bottom of this to eliminate the OOF greenery in the bottom left.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on July 31, 2012 at 8:56 PM
Beautiful capture. The entire color palette is fantastic. Great pose, wonderful environment. Love it :toast:
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on July 31, 2012 at 9:31 PM
Rich,
You are correct. I shoot raw, and the camera "picture style" preset is irrelevant.
I know this, but had a brain fart :wink: Thank you for pointing that out.
As far as philosophies go, that's your approach & I respect that.
But I try to sell and few prints now & then to help support my "hobby".
Much harder to do that without a standardized framing ratio.
Post script: I have removed that line from the text, & thanx again.
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on August 1, 2012 at 9:20 AM
Alternate squared comp from vertical @ full width, eliminating most of the OOF leaves BLC.
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on August 1, 2012 at 10:06 AM
These have to be one of the most colorful birds in North America. Great image. The focus and detail are right on and the environment really adds to the feeling of the image. :eek: :eek:
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on August 1, 2012 at 10:56 AM
The alternate composition looks good: it maintains the feel for setting while making the bunting a bit more prominent in the frame.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on August 1, 2012 at 12:46 PM
Very beautiful bird in it's environment. Not the tiniest nit from me - excellent!
Sandy
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on August 1, 2012 at 6:58 PM
Wonderful shot of a bird I have never seen. I also like the re-post much better as my eye goes right for the bird, nice job in getting this shot.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Simon Bennett on August 1, 2012 at 7:59 PM
Great capture of a lovely bird and setting.
Registered on February 4, 2007, 350 Posts, 4614 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on August 2, 2012 at 3:36 AM
Very nice photo of this beautiful bunting in great habitat Howard. I like both compositions, but personally like the second version better.

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Ray Whitt on August 2, 2012 at 8:16 AM
Excellent Howard! Beautiful colors and composition. Love the habitat surrounding the Bunting.

Ray
Registered on May 27, 2011, 92 Posts, 2619 Comments