Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Circumspect
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Circumspect

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted September 17, 2012623 views18 comments
Circumspect

I have an admission to make: I love wild animals (and some selected not-so-wild ones too, like my two Portuguese Water Dogs!). Part of it is their sheer beauty. But even more than the aesthetics, I'm amazed and intriqued by the behaviour of wild animals. I caught this female coyote giving this look as it paused along the side of a busy highway and seemed to be deciding if the potential reward for crossing the road was worth the risk of doing so. It may be anthropomorphic, but I think it's hard to look at this photo and not think the coyote is pondering some decision...

Two further comments about this photo and the situation that lead to it. First, even though I shoot images almost daily and tend to use some pretty nice equipment, I'm still amazed at what advances in camera technology have meant to our images and what we can even consider shooting. This image was captured early in the morning, before the sun had even rose above the mountains that were surrounding me. In short, while it wasn't dark, there wasn't a whole lot of light. We saw this coyote along the edge of the highway while driving along and knew we had to move fast to get the images - there was no time to get out tripods out and set up. I had my 600mm lens on my D4 at the time and it was literally "grab camera, point, adjust a few settings, and shoot". So this image was captured while hand-holding a 600mm lens (while sitting cross-legged on the other side of the highway) at ISO 2000. Stuff you couldn't even imagine doing a few years back. Cool. And what an exciting time to be a wildlife photographer!

Second, this image was captured during a week when I had an enthusiastic wildlife photographer from The Netherlands with me for private tutoring. It's real easy to assume that the way you have always done things is the way everyone does them. But early in the week I realized that what comes "natural" to me is definitely NOT what would come "natural" to others. Early in our week together we were discussing how we actually shoot images. My client (who I call by his real name - Henk) had always focused on a subject (locking on using Single-Servo AF mode) and, once locked on the subject, then recomposed his shot. I have always composed my image first, then toggled my AF bracket to where it was needed to get the right part of the image in focus. And, I almost always use Continuous-Servo AF mode. So, the first thing Henk does is focus, while the last thing I do before capturing the image is focus. No right or wrong here - just different approaches to the same end. And, if one's subject is stationery it should make no difference at all to the final outcome. But, animals move - that's why I like focusing at the absolute last moment before I click the shutter (and that's also why I like using Continuous-Servo AF - those darned animals move, including in the last microsecond between acquiring focus and triggering the shutter). Does my approach (compose first, focus last) produce a higher percentage of sharp images than Henk's (focus first, compose last) approach? Possibly, but the reality is that I actually don't know. But it's something to think about and perhaps experiment with...

Subject: Female coyote (Canis latrans) debating her options
Location: Kootenay National Park, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4
Lens: Nikkor 600mm f4 VRII lens - hand-held. VR on and in "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/640s @ f5; ISO 2000. -0.33 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: This is about 70% of full frame image

Additional details about the image (including processing details) available here:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/.

Comments and critiques welcomed - probably best to view the larger version prior to doing so!

BTW: In a perfect world I'd would have liked a tiny bit more room on the bottom (if, for no other reason to stem those "where's the virtual feet?" comments!! :wink: ). But if I included even one more pixel below it would have been road! C'est la vie!

Cheers...thanks for looking...

Brad

Comments

18 comments
Comment posted by Verdon on September 17, 2012 at 3:51 PM
wow, from every single aspect stunning!!! THREE THUMBS UP! :wavey: :toast: :wavey:
Registered on June 10, 2011, 147 Posts, 1444 Comments
Comment posted by Max Waugh on September 17, 2012 at 6:27 PM
The eyes in particular are gorgeous, Brad.

Focusing technique is an interesting subject to me, mainly because my own methods have evolved a bit in recent years. Most important is the adoption of the back button focus, getting away from focusing with the shutter button. It makes composing and focusing so much easier (no matter what order you do it in), and is something I wish I had been aware of years ago.

Max
Registered on September 26, 2008, 428 Posts, 2329 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Williams on September 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM
Your photos never cease to amaze me. Beautiful. Thanks for the background story to go along with it too.
Registered on December 28, 2010, 636 Posts, 3499 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on September 17, 2012 at 7:26 PM
Good pose, great detail fine color! And all before sunup! Thanks for sharing and your comentary on focusing.
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on September 17, 2012 at 9:53 PM
Hey Max,

Interesting comments and good feedback re: using the back-focus button - another "different strokes for different folks" thing. I know many folks who swear by it, but I have to say that after trying to force myself to do it a number of times, it simply doesn't work at all for me. I think the reason is simply my preferred camera set-up - if I used the back-focus button then my thumb would have 3 major tasks - making exposure adjustments, toggling the AF bracket all over the viewfinder, AND focusing. I prefer a more equitable sharing of "the critical tasks" between my index finger and thumb without overloading one or the other!

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Morkel Erasmus on September 18, 2012 at 5:27 PM
Love the quality here, Brad, as with all your images... :toast:
The feet - neither here nor there as I too have had my fair share of "forced and unforced" amputations in the past year or so.
I am beginning to be more comfortable with it if the other elements are strong enough...e.g. here the face and eyes have all my attention.

I switched to back-focus-button-maneuvre-thingy last year and am loving it...but as you say it places more "strain" on your thumb :biggrin:
Registered on March 22, 2011, 385 Posts, 2068 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on September 18, 2012 at 6:45 PM
Great body language going on here Brad :cool: The facial details are excellent!

Along with the advantage of being able to shoot in lower light situations using higher ISO settings with digital capture, the back focus button is my next favorite option of the new camera bodies. I've been shooting this way a couple years now and would be lost without this option. Essentially you have two focus modes available in one button (one shot and continuous focus). But, for the most part when photographing a still subject I focus first then recompose and shoot.

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Patrick Martin on September 18, 2012 at 9:09 PM
Hey Brad,
Another great one. I especially like her facial expression and the bokeah. Virtual feet are not of much importance to me. I am more of a leg man.
Best
Pat
Registered on November 11, 2011, 0 Posts, 4 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on September 18, 2012 at 9:21 PM
Brad,

Truly a stunning image. It's amazing what technology allows us to do these days (just a few years back that ISO 2000 would have made the image unusable). A wonderful find and perfectly captured (well - maybe a TOUCH more room on the bottom)
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Joe James on September 18, 2012 at 9:33 PM
Wonderful coyote shot Brad! Thanks as always for the commentary. I fall into the focus first, compose second group and have a higher proportion of slightly OOF shots than I would like so you have just given me something new to try.
Registered on November 20, 2009, 89 Posts, 808 Comments
Comment posted by Ajit Huilgol on September 18, 2012 at 11:16 PM
Great image, as always, Brad! And, love the new thread you've started. I, too, compose first and toggle the focus point(s) later, and don't use the rear button for focusing.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 302 Posts, 2055 Comments
Comment posted by mark daly on September 19, 2012 at 12:15 AM
this is an insanely gorgeous image - the eyes are incredible.
Registered on September 4, 2012, 27 Posts, 28 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on September 19, 2012 at 11:06 AM
love the expression n mood here !
BTW, I too focus first and compose later and sometimes use back button. I have been shooting from manual camera days, so used to focus first. When shooting action, I prefer to focus first. There are no rights or wrongs and the best technique is the one, you are comfortable with.
Jagdeep Rajput :wavey:
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on September 19, 2012 at 2:17 PM
This is a very sweet portrait Brad. The lack of room at the bottom is a little unfortunate, buy always better than a road included :wink: . Interesting to hear people's focusing preferences. If I use the back button I use it only to STOP the focus, mainly in anticipation of projected movement of the subject into the area with my active focus point.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Clinton Bauder on September 19, 2012 at 5:27 PM
Nice image Brad. The expression and detail on the face is incredible. Amazing that this was shot at ISO 2000! I do find the lack of virtual feet to be slightly unfortunate but the only thing I can think of to fix it would be to crop from the top but that would make a squarish image which is also a bit awkward and the right side negative space is important.

I find myself wishing the background wasn't so simple. While it does isolate the subject well I wonder if it wouldn't be more interesting to see a bit of the coyote's environment?

Regarding AF mode for me (underwater) it depends dramatically on what I'm shooting. For wide I tend to use a group AF mode and am usually happy to focus on whatever is closest to the camera. Fisheye lenses have lots of DOF so it doesn't have to be perfect anyway. For typical macro or mid-distance portrait shots with a "longer" lens I'm using a single point AF with AF controlled by half-pressing the shutter release. AF-C helps here if the subject or the cameraman is moving or being moved by the water. For super-macro with a dioptre I'll use a single point AF controlled by the AF-ON button or sometimes manual focus to get close and then "zone focus" by moving the whole camera in and out to get the focus perfect.

Clinton
Registered on December 8, 2009, 31 Posts, 231 Comments
Comment posted by Jenaya Launstein on September 23, 2012 at 12:32 AM
I definitely agree with you that she seems to be thinking about something! Love those eyes! To me she almost has this kind of shy/submissive look to her in this picture.

Can't believe you shot this at ISO 2000!! Although there isn't much light, what light there is is gorgeous!
Registered on February 8, 2011, 254 Posts, 1302 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on September 23, 2012 at 6:31 PM
Terrific as usual Brad. The eyes make this.
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Sachin Rai on November 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM
What a beautifully made image. Good discussion on focusing too. As they all put it - its a personal preference :)
Registered on February 29, 2012, 15 Posts, 26 Comments