Gallery: WildlifePosted September 22, 2012150 views6 comments
C&C appreciated. Should I have used a different aperture?
70-200 f 2.8 at 193, nikon d700 Hand held, ISO 400
Comments
6 comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on September 22, 2012 at 12:15 PM
With shots like this (and generally, imo) you want as fast a shutter speed as you can get, and a higher ISO to freeze any action you come across. Always check your histogram. You did pretty well here - I'm assuming you were on a boat and couldn't use a tripod well. That makes it even more esential to have a fast SS.
Sandy
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on September 22, 2012 at 1:55 PM
Nice spray Lindy! The dark BG makes it stand out very well too. I assume you used f/2.8? If so, with that lens at this distance that could be right, as long as the focus is spot on . Personally I would crop some off the bottom as it does not add much to the image.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Jenaya Launstein on September 23, 2012 at 12:06 AM
Nice image! I always love getting the spray in the picture, it looks so cool! I agree with Vincent about cropping off some of the bottom, it would bring the image to a whole new level IMO.
Registered on February 8, 2011, 254 Posts, 1302 Comments
Comment posted by Ajit Huilgol on September 23, 2012 at 3:49 AM
I would agree about cropping out a generous bit off the bottom of the frame, Lindy. If you have shot this at f2.8, it would be ok, because the subject is so far off, and you want to blur the bg. However, I suspect the aperture wasn't at 2.8 because a lot of the foreground is still focused ok - then again, my comments would depend on how much you have cropped off the original image! Now, regarding shutter speed - you want to get enough to counterbalance the shake in the boat, but you also want to slow things down to get the spray as a blur rather than razor sharp; the former adds to the drama, whereas capturing each and every drop (this is so subjective, though) isn't to everyone's liking. I hope I am intelligible - sometimes, I can't seem to understand myself, after I have read my comments!!!
Registered on December 19, 2008, 302 Posts, 2055 Comments
Comment posted by Lindy Martin on September 23, 2012 at 7:50 AM
Thanks everyone. Agit, , the image is not cropped and it was shot at f2.8 at 1/2000. What I did put down incorrectly was that I used a d300. Sorry about that. I think I will try cropping some of the bottom out. Thanks
Registered on March 10, 2009, 60 Posts, 169 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on September 24, 2012 at 8:39 AM
Hi Lindy,
These guys are always challenging to photograph - but fun! I agree with the previous comments on cropping some off the bottom. In terms of the aperture - I have a bit different take here. While you want to keep shutter speed fairly high, I would argue you should stop down a little here. Why? Because it's real hard with these guys to get the focus spot-on - partly because you have little time each time they breathe, but also because the spray from the blow often "nabs" the AF system (and, as a matter of fact, I think this happened here a bit). And, virtually every lens on the planet is slightly sharper when stopped down 2/3 to 1 stop from wide open. So...I would say give away a LITTLE of that shutter speed (or, if your camera works well at decent ISO's) I'd stop down about a stop here. In this case that would have given you f4 and 1/1000, which still would have frozen the action...
Cheers...
Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comments
6 commentsSandy
These guys are always challenging to photograph - but fun! I agree with the previous comments on cropping some off the bottom. In terms of the aperture - I have a bit different take here. While you want to keep shutter speed fairly high, I would argue you should stop down a little here. Why? Because it's real hard with these guys to get the focus spot-on - partly because you have little time each time they breathe, but also because the spray from the blow often "nabs" the AF system (and, as a matter of fact, I think this happened here a bit). And, virtually every lens on the planet is slightly sharper when stopped down 2/3 to 1 stop from wide open. So...I would say give away a LITTLE of that shutter speed (or, if your camera works well at decent ISO's) I'd stop down about a stop here. In this case that would have given you f4 and 1/1000, which still would have frozen the action...
Cheers...
Brad