Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
The Compound Eye
‹ PreviousWeekly Challenge GalleryNext ›

The Compound Eye

by Howard Cheek

Gallery: Weekly ChallengePosted September 22, 2012108 views8 comments
Large Flesh Fly (Flesh flies usually have a striped thorax, but not always) on a thistle bud, mostly cloudy.
F/16, 1/100th, ISO 640, 1D M3, Sigma 150mm + Kenko 1.4x ext & fill.
Monopod for support.
Here's some info on the compound eye if you're interested:

Compared with single-aperture eyes, such as the human eye, compound eyes have poor resolution so they are not good at making out detail. On the other hand, compound eyes have a very large angle of view and the ability to detect fast movement and, in some cases, the polarization of light. Insects that can fly well, such as honey bees and flies, or that catch prey, such as dragonflies or preying mantis, have specialized zones of eye facets. These zones are organized into a fovea area that gives acute vision. In the acute zone, the eye is flattened and the facets are larger, which allows more facets to receive light from a spot and thereby achieve higher resolution.

Compound eyes generally allow only a short range of vision. For example, flies and mosquitoes can see only a few millimeters in front of them with any degree of resolution, although within this short range they can see detail that we could see only with a microscope.

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Wayne Jones on September 22, 2012 at 11:16 AM
Another perfect macro from the master.
The technical and artistic merits are obvious, Howard, but I also have to say how much I appreciate the narratives you include with your photos. They put the NATURE in Nature photography, and you should be highly commended for this aspect of your work, too. Kudos!

P.S. (non-photographic comment) The only thing that might be a bit confusing about your narrative is the use of the term "ommatidia" without defining it. I think it would be more clear if you just called them "eye facets" or included a parenthetic definition. Ommatidia -- plural of ommatidium -- are individual units, or "facets" of compound eyes.
Registered on April 18, 2007, 953 Posts, 6435 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Turner on September 22, 2012 at 11:21 AM
You have outdone yourself with this one Howard. :eek:
God has created a universe to behold and glorify. Well done my friend. :toast:
Registered on February 18, 2012, 534 Posts, 2755 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on September 22, 2012 at 12:14 PM
Good points Wayne...I simplified the text a bit :wavey:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on September 22, 2012 at 3:24 PM
Both the eye and the antennae are great! The fill really brings out some fine details. Neat shot and narrative.

In watching the mantis that I just posted, it could clearly detect the motion of a katydids 4 - 6 inches away with it's compound eyes and it "watched" me like a hawk whenever I moved the camera...about 6 inches away also. Makes me wonder if the size of the compound eye affects how far it can see?
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by John Neukirch on September 22, 2012 at 8:08 PM
Howard, what a cool shot. Just so I'm clear, a single shot not a stack right?. Incredible DOF and super detail. :toast:
Registered on July 9, 2012, 207 Posts, 1476 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Williams on September 24, 2012 at 12:12 AM
Wow, excellent detail Howard. This is a great shot of the eye, and very interesting discussion of their vision. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on December 28, 2010, 636 Posts, 3499 Comments
Comment posted by David Thomas on September 24, 2012 at 2:53 PM
I just commented on Mark Seaver's praying mantis. Is your description pertinent to the three single eyes there?

Thanks, Dave Thomas, Leesburg, VA
Registered on June 21, 2010, 30 Posts, 178 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on September 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM
Terrific detail; very nice color; good composition.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments