Black Partridge Bridge
by John Clulow
From a local forest preserve one month ago mid-morning.
Pentax K-5, Tamron 10-24 at 10mm, f/16, 1/6 s, ISO 200, tripod.
I shot a series with the thought of doing an HDR. This was one of those images which I was able to develop well enough, I thought, in ACR. So I just went with this and gave up the HDR intention.
Any comment or critique welcome
Comments
13 commentsI kind of wish the man wasn't there but still a wonderful and inviting scene for me. Nice work John.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
So, I was involved in an Intro to Nature Photography class sponsored by The Morton Aboretum. It was taught by a guy named Hank, a professional nature photographer, and, according to him, a some what famous one. I will say that he was one of the best teachers I've ever had and that in that two week period, just recently, I learned more than I have in the previous two years.
But anyway, on the last photoshoot, one where I shot the frosty green leaves I posted before somewhere, probably on the flora forum, I left early to drive to the place the club I recently joined was having their monthly shoot. When I arrived, they were just leaving. This was the only image I took because after they left a rather ominous looking car pulled into the parking area; sort of like a Grand Turino; and there was this guy with the door open playing music real loud. So it was him and me with upwards of $5K of equipment on my back. I just decided to leave.
Anyway, back to the class; Hank had gone into a couple of things. One thing was he said "HDR" means "highly dubious results" or something like that; he didn't like HDR in any case. Secondly, when he was showing us images he'd taken, he emphasized that the publishers who used his work loved red boats.
So this is the kind of ironic deal here; I'm hunkering down beside this bridge just after everyone leaves except for this guy and his wife. I'm doing a series that I want to use for HDR on account of the lighting under the bridge. Then when the guy and his wife leave and there is just this Grand Turino in the parking lot, I leave.
But then when I get home, I find this annoying guy with a red coat that makes it very difficult for me to execute the HDR I'd intended to submit for our class review. But what I was able to do was to take that single image and use what Hank taught us about Adobe Camera RAW processing to make something half way decent.
And then in class, I said I couldn't remember whether he'd said "red coat" or "red boat"....
You with me?
pat
I have decided against cropping the image above the dead leaves because I want to retain the fullest extent of the arc of the reflection on the right side which the crop suggested wound truncate. I understand the point, but it's my choice as the "artist", as it were.
So no B&W conversion either. Sorry.
What this discussion has caused me t ask myself is "what consitutes a 'distraction' "?
Let us say we have an image "AB"
Now, if you are interested in "A", then "B" would be a "distraction" if it is positioned too close to "A".
"B" could, perhaps, be cloned out or removed with the "healing brush", but what about those who would have liked to see "B"?
There will be viewers who will also like AB as opposed to B alone or A alone.
Bottom lne, while I very much appreciate all the comments
I kind of like it better with out the foreground dead leaves and without the dude in the red coat. Thanks!!
John