Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Signed Sculpture WC#564
‹ PreviousWeekly Challenge GalleryNext ›

Signed Sculpture WC#564

by John Clulow

Gallery: Weekly ChallengePosted December 12, 201250 views9 comments
hehe....I found myself responding to several of the B&W images and then realized they are part of Weekly Challenge 564. So this is one I took during a club outing at Danada Forest Preserve in DuPage County, Illinois, USA, end of September.

When I saw this remnant of a tree trunk, it looked like a sculpture to me, and I realized that the trees were the artist, so I tried to put them in the frame in the area typically reserved for the artist's signature.

Pentax K-5, Tamron 17-50 at 40mm, 100 ISO and 1/60s. Intended to become B&W from the intention before pressing the shutter release.

Just something I have, but I wanted to post something to participate in this wonderful set of challenge images which I find so attractive.

Comments

9 comments
Comment posted by Patricia Brundage on December 12, 2012 at 7:57 PM
Nice find! Great character shown via the shapes and textures in the wood. I like the hidden story told by its age and shapes.
Registered on March 23, 2006, 1111 Posts, 6531 Comments
Comment posted by Carolyn Derstine on December 12, 2012 at 8:26 PM
Tree trunks with all their great texture can be a wonderful B&W subject as your photo illustrates. This tree does have an interesting shape and looks like it also has lots of interesting texture and shadings. A larger version would be helpful to see all that amazing detail better. I was going to suggest cloning out the trees in the bottom right but then. . .pardon me!. . . I saw that that was the trees' "signature"! :wink: Interesting idea, John. :smile:
Registered on February 16, 2011, 610 Posts, 3684 Comments
Comment posted by John Clulow on December 12, 2012 at 8:35 PM
Thank you Patricia, I probably have the RAW file somewhere, but we'll skip it for purposes of this WC deal, and Carolyn, consider yourself pardoned; which is germane to the more general issue of how we interpret images incorporating the intentions of the image maker, isn't it?

But because I said it and you listened, you receive a pardon, my friend :smile: :wavey:
Registered on November 1, 2012, 155 Posts, 1079 Comments
Comment posted by Lucy VanSwearingen on December 12, 2012 at 9:43 PM
I like the idea....and the shape :smile: Maybe a bit of burning here and there to bring out the texture a bit more. Lots of potential here :jump:
Registered on May 23, 2009, 800 Posts, 2042 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on December 13, 2012 at 9:25 AM
A lot of interesting detail here. A larger image would show this to better advantage, as well as making critiquing easier and more definitive. As is, I like it, but it seems over sharpened.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on December 13, 2012 at 7:00 PM
John, I like your comp which shows off this old tree trunk very well. Looks like you have some wonderful texture and detail here. Maybe just a bit oversharpened but I like it.

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Jones on December 13, 2012 at 11:18 PM
Good centered comp to show off the interesting shape, and the textures work well in this light.
Registered on April 18, 2007, 953 Posts, 6435 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on December 14, 2012 at 8:36 AM
What a neat stump. The weathered wood is perfect for a b&w subject.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by John Clulow on December 15, 2012 at 12:09 PM
Thank you, Lucy, Phil, John, Wayne, and Mark for looking and commenting. I particularly like the alliteration in Mark's "weathered wood" description. I should have called it that.
Registered on November 1, 2012, 155 Posts, 1079 Comments