Doubt and Distrust
This one is for those of you who thought I might be blowing smoke about continuing to post images after my "retirement" (hey...where's the pension??) as one of the moderators!
This one is another in my decidedly anthropomorphic "WOW...what a huge range of behaviours and interactions over just 3 minutes..." series (the other ones can be viewed in
my NPN gallery).
In this shot mom is interacting with another sea lion that appears interested in sharing the rock with her and her pup. It's hard to tell what mom thinks of the newcomer here - she could be greeting the "intruder", warding it off, just checking it out - pretty much impossible to say. But junior couldn't be clearer in what he/she is saying - "...Whoa, not sure I like this idea!" - there's definitely some major doubt and distrust being conveyed here...and conveying junior's behaviour and expression was my primary goal in how I composed this shot...
Subject: Mom, pup and 3rd Steller Sea Lions (
Eumetopias jubatus)
Location: Northern Vancouver Island, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4
Lens: Nikkor 400mm f2.8 VRII lens - hand-held from Zodiac. VR on and in "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/1600s @ f6.3; ISO 1400. -1.0 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: Minor - this is about 85% of full frame
Additional details about the image (including processing details) available here:
http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/detail_2.html.
Comments and critiques welcomed - probably best to view the larger version prior to doing so!
Cheers...thanks for looking...
Brad
Comments
6 commentsThanks for the warm welcome...I had heard this was a friendly place...
You asked a few questions: "...do you use noise reduction at all? If so, what do you use? Could you let us in on a few 'tricks'?"
So...my answers: No. Nothing, No. And I'm KIDDING.
Right now I rarely do any noise reduction beyond that during raw conversion - and in most cases only very lightly there. For instance, on this shot there I had the noise reduction settings on my favourite raw converter (Capture One Pro by Phase One) setting to almost zero. But it was a very clean capture. However on real high ISO shots (such as this shot at ISO 10,000), I use "slightly higher than default" noise reduction settings during raw conversion. And even then I do it selectively - and in that ISO 10,000 example it was on the background only.
Historically I used to use Noise Ninja occasionally (again selectively, and again almost always on backgrounds only). But since I started using a D3s and then a D4 I found that there was really no need for that software (those cameras have amazing high ISO performance, and the noise reduction on Capture One Pro has improved a lot as well).
In this discussion there is an elephant in the room. Discussing ONLY the software enabling the production of clean high ISO shots ignores half the equation - the hardware part.Trust me when I say I truly hate getting into the Canon vs. Nikon thing (almost as much as the Mac vs. PC thing), but there is a bit of an asymmetry right now with respect to hardware capabilities (if you are comparing high ISO performance). Simply put, those using current full-frame Nikons DO have an advantage in ISO performance over those using full-frame Canons. Don't get me wrong - the Canons are awfully good too. And the new 1D-X is very good. But if you're shooting a D3s or D4 you have a leg up on everyone else in ISO performance. This obviously could change real fast, but it's the current reality.
These comments come after shooting side-by-side with many Canon shooters and then sitting around a table processing images together. And, there's a whole lot more to a good camera than just ISO performance!
Just trying to give you an honest response - absolutely NOT trying to offend anyone or criticize their equipment choice.
Cheers...
Brad