Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Dead Goose, Happy Eagle
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Dead Goose, Happy Eagle

by Brad Hill

Gallery: AvianPosted January 22, 2013279 views10 comments
Dead Goose, Happy Eagle

Although British Columbia's Khutzeymateen Inlet is best known for its grizzly bears (for good reason), the inlet has a lot of other interesting wildlife. That list includes wolves, harbor seals, otters, mink, a plethora of songbirds, waterfowl, and of course, some pretty spectacular birds of prey - such as Sharp-shinned and Coopers Hawks and Harriers. And, there's always a Bald Eagle or two hanging around!

We noticed this Bald Eagle on the shoreline near where our 71' sailboat (our "floating basecamp") was anchored. Other eagles were in the area and were swooping down to harrass this one, which we thought likely signified that THIS eagle was "sitting" on something worthwhile. Turns out we were right - this fellow was on a freshly killed Canada Goose. A tiny bit of its flesh and some of its downy feathers are visible in this shot. The orange/brown vegetation covering the rock is common along shorelines on the west coast and is of the genus Fucus.

Subject: Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) feasting on hapless Canada Goose
Location: Khutzeymateen Inlet, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4
Lens: Nikkor 400mm f2.8 VR - hand-held from floating zodiac. VR on and in "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/400s @ f9; ISO 640. -1.67 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: Very minor - this is about 95% of full-framed image

As always, way more info about this image (including more image capture and post processing details) is available for this image on my website, in this case right here:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/birds/birdsofprey/detail_5.html.

Comments and critiques welcomed - probably best to view the larger version prior to doing so!

Cheers...

Brad

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on January 22, 2013 at 9:11 PM
Greet shot Brad. I am so glad you are still posting. Always a treat.
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on January 22, 2013 at 9:29 PM
Incredible clarity, detail and surrounding habitat. One of the better images I've seen of this species.
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by James Allen on January 22, 2013 at 10:43 PM
The splotches of blood on it's face give the eagle's stare that much more power.
Registered on December 10, 2012, 14 Posts, 232 Comments
Comment posted by David E Lester on January 22, 2013 at 11:03 PM
Excellent shot and detail.. :toast:
Registered on March 24, 2010, 155 Posts, 793 Comments
Comment posted by Elizabeth Arellano on January 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM
Excellent, I enjoyed all of it!
Registered on February 18, 2008, 35 Posts, 302 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on January 23, 2013 at 3:20 PM
An interesting setting with the shoreline and wonderful detail on the larger version. You can certainly tell that the eagle has something and they can give such an intense look at times. I was surprised to see you used -1.67 compensation in such a dark scene but I assume this was to deal with the 'white's' on the eagle. Nice job in getting this from a zodiac, well done.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on January 23, 2013 at 5:06 PM
Hey Jim (and others),

Jim - you say: "I was surprised to see you used -1.67 compensation in such a dark scene but I assume this was to deal with the 'white's' on the eagle"

Well...yes...and no. This was a very dark scene overall - far darker than neutral gray (almost two stops darker). So even if this was an immature eagle with a dark head, I would have exposed the scene this way. I use multi-segment metering (Matrix for Nikon folks, Evaluative in Canon-speak) - these systems always try to produce a scene of neutral gray (in "histogram terms" this means they're trying to force the exposure to the center of the histogram). With a dark scene like this the camera would try to force it to neutral gray, resulting in an over-exposure. So the whole scene would "brighten up" (and not look like what I saw in the field) AND the whites on the eagle would have blown out. So...I was thinking about saving those highlights, but I would have under-exposed this scene even if it didn't have any whites in it.

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on January 23, 2013 at 10:49 PM
Outstanding image. Certainly a different than most eagle photos. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by Balan Vinod on January 24, 2013 at 5:06 AM
Some fantastic detail here Brad. Love this ...and exhibits a sense of achievement from the bird ..Nicely done

Balan Vinod
Registered on March 20, 2006, 889 Posts, 2312 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on January 24, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Brad,
Living in Tucson, AZ I am usually dealing with too much harsh light so it was interesting to read about your approach to handling a dark scene. Thanks for the follow up reply.
Jim
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments