Gallery: LandscapePosted February 1, 2013330 views5 comments
This image is sharp (I hope). White Pocket at Sunset. 5 shot HDR .7 EV D300 18-200 Polarizing filter, tripod
Comments
5 comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on February 1, 2013 at 8:30 PM
Hate to break it to you but the larger image is not sharp. Smaller version looks much better... colors and textures are all great.
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on February 1, 2013 at 10:06 PM
Amazing place. Really like the irregular regularity of the foreground.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Hartmann on February 2, 2013 at 12:30 AM
Nice. I like how the soft light on the foreground contrasts with the bright background light and the sky is the icing on the cake.
Registered on January 15, 2009, 13 Posts, 772 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on February 3, 2013 at 2:24 PM
Rick,
Terrific landscape image. Great light in the background, complementary sky and I like the composition with the river of rock leading the viewer in to the scene.
This posted version looks sharp enough, but as Luke pointed out, the larger version is pretty far off. If you like you can post or email me because I would like to ask what your process is for generating the larger version. In general, you should always generate the smaller and larger versions separately from your master file. But then maybe you just forgot to sharpen the larger version?
That larger version would really "rock" if the sharpening was there.
Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Jeffrey Sipress on February 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM
Good looking HRD imaging. It won't print well due to softness but it is fine as a small jpeg.
Registered on February 17, 2004, 236 Posts, 1197 Comments
Comments
5 commentsTerrific landscape image. Great light in the background, complementary sky and I like the composition with the river of rock leading the viewer in to the scene.
This posted version looks sharp enough, but as Luke pointed out, the larger version is pretty far off. If you like you can post or email me because I would like to ask what your process is for generating the larger version. In general, you should always generate the smaller and larger versions separately from your master file. But then maybe you just forgot to sharpen the larger version?
That larger version would really "rock" if the sharpening was there.
Lon