Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Repost - Fall Stream
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Repost - Fall Stream

by LeRoy Gunderson

Gallery: LandscapePosted May 21, 2013107 views4 comments
I tried to adjust this photo after reading the comments on my original post. I cropped to exclude the road, tried to reduce the harsh light and also bring back some detail to the stream.

Canon 7D
24-105 lens
1/125 f8


I am willing to learn so comments are always welcome.

Comments

4 comments
Comment posted by Peter Richter on May 21, 2013 at 11:46 AM
LeRoy, your repost is a definite improvement to my eye. I especially like your composition with the creek leading me into the depth in an appealing way.

Peter
Registered on November 10, 2010, 218 Posts, 2723 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on May 21, 2013 at 12:10 PM
LeRoy,

Thanks for the repost and taking the time to consider the feedback. I also think this is improvement, especially in handling the detail in the water and the hotspots, they're gone! And good job with the crop, the comp is improved as well. Overall, the exposure is darker and especially darker on the right. What I think would work here with this image is some selective dodging and burning. This requires masking and painting selected areas, like lightening the shadow areas on the right as opposed to globally adjusting the image. Lots of tutorials on the web and if you haven't already, go get, read and install Tony Kuyper's tutorials and actions. goodlight.us/tutorials

One other comment, which may be obvious. Yes, we can always process our images to correct/improve many aspects of an image. But there is no adjustment or correct though that can correct things like harsh light. In other words, the solution might be to return at a later time in the day, etc. Of course that's not always possible since so many of our images are during a one-time visit and that just happened to be the time you were at the location. And the hot light isn't always bad - as I mentioned it works great for back lighting leaves, but did create heavy contrasts in the rocks and water.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by LeRoy Gunderson on May 21, 2013 at 12:22 PM
Thanks to all for taking the time to review my corrections and offer suggestions for improvement. You are correct about the time of day and when traveling with friends one cannot always stay in an area until the light is better. I know the photo is a little dark, but as I tried to change the exposure a little to lighten it, the hot spots began to creep back in.

I do know that the light is something I need to be more attentive of as I am taking photos. Getting better in Lightroom would help too.

Thanks again. :wavey:
Registered on December 14, 2004, 27 Posts, 112 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on May 21, 2013 at 4:24 PM
LeRoy,

Today with digital, as opposed to film which I am accustomed to, we had to live with whatever the film captured. If it was harsh contrasty light you had to give up something with film either the highlights to retain detail in the shadows or vice versa the shadows to retain detail in the highlights. In your previous post of this scene, it looked like you had ample detail in the shadows but lost them in the highlights. In this one its just the opposite. If I can assume that you simply re-processed the same raw file for this rendition, I would do a little more work and try to blend the two so that you can retain detail in both areas. You will need to use some detailed masks, like those Tony Kuyper has created in his Luminosity Masks actions, but I think it will be well worth the effort - if for no other reason other than to learn, it will still be worth it.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments