Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Grizzly Boar
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Grizzly Boar

by Rick Andrews

Gallery: WildlifePosted June 11, 2013170 views11 comments
We spotted this grizzly last week in Yoho NP, under cool, cloudy and slightly wet conditions. He was in the company of a young sow and after getting his fill on the fresh vegetation, he decided to lay down and wait for her to finish. We continued to watch them for several more minutes and I took this shot just as he was getting up to join her again.

Comments, suggestions and critique always welcome.

Tech stuff: Canon 1D4, 100-400m @ 260mm, f-5.6, 1/320, ISO 1000, Hand held.

Comments

11 comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on June 12, 2013 at 1:12 AM
This is a very nice looking enormous grizzly Rick! Awesome find. Looks like you had the same weather as us further north, perfect for outdoor photography. Not something within your control, but esthetically would have been nice to have the foreground grass and Indian Paintbrush continue right up to the spruce. Thanks for sharing. :smile:
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on June 12, 2013 at 8:17 AM
Hi Rick,

Nice specimen you captured here. Always hard to judge size from a photo (and without some clear referents to compare to), but have to agree with Gary that this seems to be a pretty big bear. Do you have other shots where the female is also in the frame? Would be interesting to see the size differential.

Technically this shot looks solid - exposure good and sharpness seems good (as much as one can tell with web-sized images). While I'm DEFINITELY not one to think one should always "fill the frame" with a subject, in this case (given the less than beautiful surrounding habitat) I'm wondering if you should have zoomed in more to emphasize both the bear and the scarlet paintbrush more? The gravel/sandy bed and the bear's pose does give the shot a bit of a diagonal flow (which is a good thing), but still thinking a closer framing might have worked better here? Just a thought...

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by William Bickle on June 12, 2013 at 9:01 AM
Hello Rick

Great Capture! Does seem Very Large ? I think like Gary & Brad about tighter crop to emphasize & greater detail . The surrounding gravel doesn't add to the overall image .

Bill
Registered on June 13, 2011, 183 Posts, 1702 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on June 12, 2013 at 1:13 PM
Nice pose here Rick and well composed. The FG grasses with those tiny red flowers add a lot to this. Unfortunately the BG is giving the image a bit of a busy appearance. I agree that going in closer might have emphasized those flowers better whilst reducing the less co-operative BG.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Andrews on June 12, 2013 at 4:26 PM
Hi guys and thank you all for the kind comments and suggestions. I agree a closer zoom in the field would have likely worked better, but since I didn't do that here's a tighter crop. When I used the original photo ratio there was still to much noisy b/g so I reverted to a squarer crop, what do you think?
Registered on December 31, 2011, 45 Posts, 222 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Andrews on June 12, 2013 at 4:34 PM
Hey Brad, I don't have many shots of them together as they were satisfying their huge appetites and for the most part both kept their heads down. This record shot does however show the relative size difference between them, although there's not much in the frame to gauge their actual size against. But I was actually quite surprised by how big they looked considering they likely haven't been out of their dens all that long.

cheers
Rick
Registered on December 31, 2011, 45 Posts, 222 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on June 12, 2013 at 10:15 PM
Hey Rick,

The tighter crop does work better for me (and you really didn't lose the diagonal flow to the image). And thanks for posting the shot of the male and female - does give you a feel for the size differential but, like you say, no referents to assist in judging absolute size (why didn't you put your camera on a self-timer and run over beside the bear - then we could have got a REAL feel for its size! :wink: - KIDDING!). But he does look big...

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Don Westbrook on June 12, 2013 at 11:31 PM
Very nice capture of a beautiful subject. I like the closer crop, and the diagonal composition.
Registered on January 4, 2013, 11 Posts, 332 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Reed on June 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM
I agree with Brad. The tight crop is much better. :toast:
Registered on September 19, 2009, 198 Posts, 1074 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on June 13, 2013 at 2:40 PM
What a good looking animal. I would be excited to have either of the photos of this guy, but the tighter crop is better.
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by Jamie Douglas on June 14, 2013 at 11:10 PM
Big bear, Big bear chase me :wink:

That is one mighty bear. Look at the posture and claws.

IQ looks a little soft again but it's a cool image.

Jamie
Registered on July 16, 2012, 10 Posts, 87 Comments