Photo of the Month 11/13
by Robert Beideman
In Hiding
14mm image from Banff National Park, captured this past December. There's nothing quite like finding a miniature ice cave that can barely fit your camera...the distance from the icicles to the stones on the lakebed is no more than 6 inches...
C&C welcomed...and always appreciated!
Robert
Larger, original image is over at: http://www.lambentphotography.com/Where-the-water-meets-the-land/i-b88kzL9/A
Comments
42 commentsBeautiful image ,unique cave capture from this location.Great comp.
Thanks again for your comment! Robert
What is this
100%
aF
fascinating picture. The rock on the right seems to constrain the view, blocking the sight, but at the same time
it provides the proper mass balance... I like it a lot.
First, the "water" around the edge of the rocks is actually a barely submerged sheet of ice that crusted the majority of the shoreline. The water would periodically be just below or above the ice that had formed...and created a bizarre effect that looks a lot like a much longer exposure than was actually taken (when the water just barely covered the ice). You can see the edge of the ice that I'm mentioning about 1/3 of the way up from the bottom of the frame, where it scallops around the reflection of the top of Mt. Girouard.
That said, over the course of any given minute during this shoot, I watched the level of this lake change by well over an inch. The periodicity of the change couldn't have been related to wave action (there wasn't much to speak of). As I know that this lake is used as both a reservoir and a feed to a power dam, I wonder if that has something to do with it.
I have to mention that I'd never spent that much time staring that closely at the level of a lake. Has anyone ever seen this...or noticed it? Perhaps it's more common than I know for lake levels to vary by more than an inch...but I can tell you that it was surprising to both me and to the front end of the 14-24! Minnewanka is a relatively large lake...so that kind of level change seemed significant to me.
In any case, what you're seeing is the blend of two images taken with two different water levels (difference is about an inch). There were many ways this could have been accomplished in pp...but the approach that I took yielded an intentionally surreal look to the rocks that appears to mimic a much longer exposure than was used.
Again, a sincere thanks to all who provided comment! It's been a while since I've been on here...and it's good to be back.
OK--i just read some of the other comments qand i see some others noticed the halo--guess it's a matter of perception how 'bad' it is
Wow!