Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Tiger Cub
‹ PreviousPOP Photos GalleryNext ›

Tiger Cub

by Ken Watkins

Gallery: POP PhotosPosted November 29, 2013179 views16 comments
This young man is almost 6 weeks old, and with his sister had been rescued from a fate worse than death. ( I will not give details as I fancy staying alive)
He will now reside at the only positive attempt to protect Tigers from the ineptitude of the Indian government.
The place is Tiger Canyons in the Free State , South Africa, probably the best 3 days I have ever spent on Safari, the tigers there live entirely free catching there own food, in an area protected by fencing of nearly 60,000 hectares.
The best place in the world for Tiger photography.
EOS 1DX
200-400mm F4 @ 250mm
F6.3
ISO 1600
1/400
EV +0.33

Comments

16 comments
Comment posted by Jack Bell on November 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM
Ken, Great image. Love the eyes, and the raised front paw. The face looks tack sharp and the lighting is very nice.
Registered on April 24, 2007, 55 Posts, 71 Comments
Comment posted by Butch Lama on November 29, 2013 at 11:59 AM
Nice captive/ free roaming Tiger image.
Registered on July 23, 2010, 42 Posts, 316 Comments
Comment posted by William Bickle on November 29, 2013 at 12:48 PM
Hello Ken

SWEET.... Beautiful Detailed Close up & the raised paw makes the Image.

Thanks for Sharing

Bill
Registered on June 13, 2011, 183 Posts, 1702 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Leggett on November 29, 2013 at 6:12 PM
What a cutie, Ken ! Excellent focus right where it counts.
Registered on July 21, 2004, 706 Posts, 3233 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on November 29, 2013 at 10:11 PM
Hi Ken. I'll start by touching on the appropriateness of posting this photo to the Wildlife Gallery, I think it belongs. I'm glad that you identified the location of the photo and explained the situation. Although the area is fenced and this might rankle some, 60,000 hectares seems like a vast area and my understanding would be that it doesn't meet the criteria of a zoo, rehab center or commercial game farm. Encouraging that this youngster has been given a home and a little help to get started in this wilderness area. I am assuming here that these tigers exist unmolested and not for the primary benefit/enjoyment of photographers and organizers who set up such safaris!!! (If this is the case, the photo belongs in the POP Gallery). The other moderators and the editor can weigh in here if I have misinterpreted.

Beautifully crafted photo Ken. Sharp eyes and face, perfect dof and don't need to say anything about that sweet little feline. I might consider warming this up just a tad if it were mine Ken, but perhaps my monitor isn't as calibrated very well.



Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on November 29, 2013 at 11:40 PM
Thanks everybody, I would just like to further elaborate on the"captive/free roaming" situation. These cubs have no mother at the moment and for the next couple of years they will be hand reared and taught to hunt, this has been done sucessfully from the commencement of this project and has resulted in at least 12 tigers living as tigers. Later to day I hope to post an image which is something I believe you would never see in a zoo :smile:
On the question of fencing the vast majority of parks in both South Africa, Namibia and Botswana are fenced largely to protect Wildlife rather than humanity. A recent report by the highly respected conservation concern Panthera indicates the need for fencing to "Save the Lion", a conclusion I entirely agree with.
The stupid decision by South African national parks to bow down to pressure from know nothing do-gooders and tree huggers which resulted in the removal of the fence between Kruger National Park and Mozambique, is the main contributor to the dreadful increase in Rhino poaching
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on November 29, 2013 at 11:54 PM
Nice image Ken.

I understand the situation of fencing in much of Africa and indeed, 60,000 acres is a huge area, large enough (IMO) to be considered free roaming as Gary concluded. However, you have indicated that this cute little guy is currently being hand reared, therefore is captive until he is capable to be released to care for himself. Therefore it seems clear this will need to be moved to "People, Objects and Places" gallery, as per guidelines.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on November 30, 2013 at 12:23 AM
Lon,

OK :biggrin:
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on November 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM
Hey Ken,

Well, regardless of where this image should be posted, this tree-hugger likes it (but take that praise under advisement, as apparently my ilk knows nothing).

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Randy Runtsch on November 30, 2013 at 7:35 AM
Hi Ken,

Nice DOF on the face and front paw. Well-composed image. :smile:
Registered on October 30, 2013, 50 Posts, 445 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on November 30, 2013 at 7:37 AM
Brad,
Sorry if you feel offended it was not meant, it is just because I get so upset by the "many" who believe the propoganda of those whose motives remain a mystery to me and many others who actually do something to help the wonderful wildlife of Africa, and in this case elsewhere.
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on November 30, 2013 at 8:02 AM
Thanks Ken,

Before making my comment I actually looked up "tree-hugger" and it simply means "environmental activist" - which I am. And, the dictionary listed the phrase as "derogatory". BUT, I am a scientist first, and any cause I get behind I research to the hilt. I have NO time for any environmental argument that begins and ends on emotional grounds only (i.e., has no ecological validity to it). I constantly run into those who think that all environmentalists are, by definition, naive and uninformed. I think that's a tremendously inaccurate stereotype - it may apply to SOME environmentalists, but certainly not all of them. Perpetuating that stereotype (and being called a "know nothing") definitely hits a raw nerve with me.

But water under the bridge. Definitely an image that makes you look twice - and that's what counts. I hope this image helps (in some small way) this little tyke and his relatives survive. Heck...if that happens, we might have to start calling YOU a tree-hugger!! :biggrin:

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on November 30, 2013 at 8:15 AM
"Heck...if that happens, we might have to start calling YOU a tree-hugger!!"

Oh no anything but that :biggrin:

I know many knowledgable environmentalists, and many who do a great deal to really save Wildlife, one day I hope to helpp them in getting the reality across.
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on November 30, 2013 at 10:51 AM
Thanks for the additional information about this tiger's status at the park. So, hand raised and in captivity, I believe then that the photo should go to the P.O.P forum as Lon has advised. Thankyou for your understanding Ken. Wonderful photo!!
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on November 30, 2013 at 12:03 PM
Gary,
I would not consider that this cub is in "captivity" as it gets taken out to play and is kept indoors for his own safety, but nevertheless will accept this
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on November 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM
Thanks again Ken, I appreciate that "captivity" in this case is a relative term.
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments