Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
The Free Style swimmer
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

The Free Style swimmer

by David Rowe

Gallery: AvianPosted January 17, 2014124 views10 comments
Geneva, Switzerland
D300s 150-500mm at 500mm
ISO 250
1/1250s at f8 EV -0.33 WB manual Center Weighted Average
Hand held
Original TIFF file cropped from 35M to 22.6M
Photoshop CS3 No sharpening

My New Year’s Resolution, photographically speaking is to address the perennial problems imposed by limited dynamic range. During several days of sublime sunny weather I set out to photograph highlighted black and white birds. I was somewhat distracted by this Red-crested Pochard passing the finishing post! My quest was to have simultaneous detail in both whites and blacks while avoiding generous helpings of the dreaded black porridge oats. I tried literally dozens of different parametric permutations including Nikon’s in camera Active D Lighting pushed to the limit. So far, I have the impression the problem can’t be solved without compromises. Right or wrong?

Your comments, suggestions and criticisms are most welcome.

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by Sharon Hallowell on January 17, 2014 at 7:36 AM
Nice pose, light, subject, and title, and I think you did a great job on the blacks and whites. I would consider cloning the red streak from the "finish post". Nice job! Sharon
Registered on November 1, 2003, 392 Posts, 4810 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on January 17, 2014 at 11:59 AM
I have found it very difficult to deal with such color contrasts in bright light and still show feather detail in the black/white range. Using exposure compensation can help a little but now I will only try to get those shots of birds like this on an overcast day, very early or late afternoon light.

Interesting pose of this colorful duck. I might crop a little off the left to eliminate the gray squiggle lines and only show that wonderful blue background.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on January 17, 2014 at 2:44 PM
Nice pose and detail in the bird, David. I don't think the problem can be solved, David. The dynamic range of cameras and even print media aren't as large as those in nature. Also, when we look in the real world, we probably don't see the detail in the shadows and highlights that everyone seems to expect in a photograph-not unless you can focus your gaze on that one small area of the scene and let your eyes adjust. You could play with HDR, but if I understand how it works, it would be difficult with a moving bird.

BTW, I do find the white reflection behind the bird rather distracting though otherwise I really like the quality of the water.

:toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on January 17, 2014 at 4:45 PM
I think you got as close as possible. I would lose the wavy white stripe behind the bird. Otherwise, a hearty well done! :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Ákos Lumnitzer on January 17, 2014 at 8:25 PM
In my very limited (landscape) experience, HDR would be possible with a stationary bird only. Moving would be rather difficult possibly due to changing surrounds. In any case, that is something we could all contemplate and experiment with at times. Now that I thought of HDR I may even try to shoot a few quiet and stationary subjects if they have the tonal range HDR would be useful for.

Nicely done overall. The OOF reflections behind the bird are the only things drawing my attention away.

:smile:
Registered on April 24, 2004, 25 Posts, 510 Comments
Comment posted by David Rowe on January 18, 2014 at 2:30 AM
Hi Sharon. Many thanks. I didn't see red in the reflection of the 'finish post' - sheer vanity prevents me from wearing glasses!
Registered on December 20, 2013, 133 Posts, 286 Comments
Comment posted by David Rowe on January 18, 2014 at 2:42 AM
Phil, many thanks for the suggestion. This was but one of five shots, with or without the wavy reflection behind the bird. For me the wavy reflection of the 'finishing post' is part and parcel of this composition - British humor and all that!
Registered on December 20, 2013, 133 Posts, 286 Comments
Comment posted by David Rowe on January 18, 2014 at 3:00 AM
Jim, thanks for the comment concerning the gray squiggle lines. Normally I would have been up to my knees in mud, photographing birds in Geneva's Sionnet marsh but instead this week I opted for the birds in one of the harbors. Brightly colored reflections of boat hulls created weird and wonderful back drops. Reflections shown in this instance are among the less exotic effects.
Registered on December 20, 2013, 133 Posts, 286 Comments
Comment posted by David Rowe on January 18, 2014 at 3:28 AM
Dennis, thanks for your thoughts on the matter. The limited dynamic range of our cameras doesn't come close to that of the human eye. In this respect I feel that we bird photographers are experiencing the protracted 'Bronze Age' of digital photography. When I compare the results shown by cameras used for TV coverage, the quality is streets ahead. Existing HDR technology works fine for static architectural photography but is inappropriate given the very nature of avian photography. Prophesy is rash but I expect that with time and advancing technology we will see HDR applied to moving subjects.
Registered on December 20, 2013, 133 Posts, 286 Comments
Comment posted by David Rowe on January 18, 2014 at 3:58 AM
Akos, many thanks. I'm not saying that existing HDR would not be a solution in some avian photos. I tend not to engage 'bursts' but prefer to take individual shots. In the frames of reference for the 'Free Style Swimmer' both the bird and reflections changed by the second.
Registered on December 20, 2013, 133 Posts, 286 Comments