Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
King of the night
‹ PreviousPOP Photos GalleryNext ›

King of the night

by Marsel van Oosten

Gallery: POP PhotosPosted May 6, 2014435 views12 comments
It's been ages since I last posted here. The past five months I've been traveling all over the place with very little time in between trips. Also, we moved from Amsterdam to Cape Town, which kept me occupied as well. In two days time our annual tours in Africa will start again, so I'll be off the grid most of the time until late August.

Here's a shot from our most recent Tigers & Leopards tour in South Africa. For this image I used two vehicles; one for myself and one for the lighting. I first positioned my vehicle for the right angle, I then used my radio to position the other vehicle for the light.

The tiger is an endangered species. Poaching for fur and body parts and destruction of habitat have simultaneously greatly reduced tiger populations in the wild. At the start of the 20th century, it is estimated there were over 100,000 tigers in the wild, but the population has dwindled outside of captivity to between 1,500 and 3,500. Major reasons for population decline include habitat destruction, habitat fragmentation and poaching. Demand for tiger parts for use in traditional Chinese medicine has been cited as a major threat to tiger populations. As long as ignorant people in China and Vietnam believe that tiger parts have medicinal value, the tiger will never be safe.

India is home to the world's largest population of wild tigers, but only 11% of the original Indian tiger habitat remains, and it has become fragmented and degraded.

In an effort to increase the chances of tigers surviving as a species, a so called ex-situ tiger conservation project was started in South Africa. The area was carefully selected to match the tiger's preferred habitat, and over the past decade it has become the most successful tiger conservation project in the world. Six months ago no less than 7 tiger cubs were born in three litters.

There has been critique from people saying that tigers don't belong in Africa, but most of those people don't realize that tigers, lions, leopards and cheetah already once shared the same continent: India.

The bottom line is: If you're serious about saving a species from going extinct, you have to think outside the box, and that's what this project is all about.

Comments

12 comments
Comment posted by Jenaya Launstein on May 6, 2014 at 8:00 AM
Beauty image, Marsel! I love the lighting on his face. It gives a sense of dawn breaking over the horizon.
Registered on February 8, 2011, 254 Posts, 1302 Comments
Comment posted by Balan Vinod on May 6, 2014 at 8:55 AM
Marsel ...You nailed this one ..and its very original. Magical feeling of the light on its face.

I was born and brought up in the mountains in Southern India ..I have roamed around the place for 20 years now....and have not come across a single tiger in the "true wilderness".

I am happy to know that this majestic animal is getting new lease of life ..

Balan Vinod
Registered on March 20, 2006, 889 Posts, 2312 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on May 6, 2014 at 12:21 PM
Marsel,
This is stunning, presumably taken at John Varty's Tiger Canyons a wonderful place.
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on May 6, 2014 at 12:24 PM
It reminds me of saying,"tiger-tiger burning bright, in the forest of the night".
You have really used spot light to your advantage here, may prefer some more canvas on the right.
Jagdeep Rajput :toast:
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on May 6, 2014 at 4:47 PM
Hi Marsel,

Very nice shot and an interesting commentary with a good conservation message to boot! Well done.

The rules on what qualifies as a "captive" animal (and thus eligible for inclusion in the Wildlife Gallery) has evolved over the last year. We've considered and debated about this particular facility and while no one disputes the positive contribution or ethics of the facility, images taken within fall under the "captive" category as defined by NPN. The new rules allow the posting of such images in the POP Gallery. So I have taken the liberty of moving image to that gallery. My only other option would be to delete the shot, which would be a shame with such a fine image. If you would prefer the image deleted (over transfer to the POP gallery), please contact either Lon or I and we will do so.

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on May 6, 2014 at 5:37 PM
Stunning....... :toast:

Marsel, this is flat gorgeous. Like many species it is sad to see the destructive poaching taking place for truly nothing more then total ignorance.
The project you've outlined taking place in Africa is a real ray of hope for the tiger species anyway. Good luck to all those folks with their positive efforts. :cool:
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on May 6, 2014 at 5:44 PM
A real beauty of an animal and an image. Excellent!!
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Marsel van Oosten on May 6, 2014 at 6:35 PM
I'm completely lost as to why this has been moved to the POP gallery. The reserve is fenced, but so are most isolated game reserves in South Africa - no fences means people and/or wildlife get killed. It is also not a zoo or a wildlife rehabilitation center.

These tigers are wild. They can hunt for themselves. A herd of over a hundred wildebeest was wiped out by these tigers in under two years - quite the opposite of captive I'd say. I've got pictures of tigers that caught blesbok, warthog and porcupine (ouch).

So I guess the interesting question is: when is an animal called captive? Is there a golden rule as to how many acres/hectares a fenced reserve needs to be for an animal living in it can be called wild?
Registered on March 9, 2004, 285 Posts, 2277 Comments
Comment posted by Thomas Haney on May 7, 2014 at 2:03 AM
Beautiful Marsel, what a wonderful image. I sympathize with your confusion as to why the image was moved. I'm sure the moderator is just following the guidelines, but if an animal is self-sufficient and not removed from natural selection, it's wild as far as I'm concerned.
Registered on April 7, 2013, 138 Posts, 537 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on May 8, 2014 at 1:33 AM
Marsel, I won't add to the controversy. In and of itself this is a wonderful image, taken with a skilled hand, and I am sure not easy to set up and take. Wherever it is posted, it shines! :toast: :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Navin Sarma on May 10, 2014 at 7:49 PM
Great image, and I believe it belongs in Wildlife
Registered on July 17, 2011, 233 Posts, 1373 Comments
Comment posted by Lorna Taylor on May 20, 2014 at 11:02 PM
So beautiful, stunning light and detail !
Registered on November 12, 2010, 254 Posts, 3083 Comments