A Black Hole
by Jared Warren
I'll be interested to get your thoughts on this one. It's from a trip earlier this spring, but I hadn't worked on it till now because the processing "befuddled" me. It was actually shot as a 180 degree stitched pano, but the comp just didn't work, so this is what I settled on. The sky exposures were at f/2.8, 25 sec, ISO 5000; the terrain was around first light of dawn, f/8, 30sec, ISO 100.
The scene had a pretty surreal look to begin with, so I pushed the MW a little in post, but I actually desaturated the terrain somewhat and tried to keep it "cool." I also played with the subtle highlights and shadows to try to change the apparent direction of the light - the dawn was breaking to the left, but I wanted it to look more like it could be coming from the MW. Anyway, it's been fun playing with and I'll look forward to your suggested refinements.
Comments
24 commentsMichael, I know what you mean about MW images being cliched; I've felt the same, but still enjoy producing them. More importantly, I just love being out under the stars particularly in some of these unique locations. It's both humbling and exhilarating staring up at our Milky Way and realizing our solar system is one of billions in our galaxy, which itself is just one of billions of galaxies in the cosmos. Leads to some poignant thoughts and questions, unlike what I'm thinking right now (why I skipped lunch and what I'm going to eat now).
BTW: You might consider submitting this to APOD (Astronomy Picture of the Day) NASA's astronomy website. This image is as nice as many others I've seen there.
--P
John
Very unique and the PP is so well done.
I still might bring up the FG a bit, with iso100 it would not hurt at all.....
I fine both images equally appealing. Strong composition and excellent processing on both. I do agree with Eva that what makes these work so well for me is the absence of light painting. I prefer the outdoors at night but with the exception of a couple of lunar images, never try to shoot then. This is realistic enough that I will get out more in the evening. Beautiful work.
pat
Great image.The colors of the Milky Way look quite natural, though a little blue at upper left in the constellation Cygnus. You have wonderful balance with the foreground even with it taking up so much space. I like both versions. On my desktop with calibrated monitor, the repost looks a little better to me, but on my laptop the original looks best. In practice, both are excellent in my view.
Now for some small nits. By doing the foreground later when twilight started, two things seem out of place. 1) The reflection in the water is bright and blue, but the sky is black. 2) There are no stars in the reflection, and with a wonderful star filled sky, there should be some stars in the reflection.
You can do the foreground the same time as the sky, just do a longer exposure. For example, I typically do 30 second exposures at ISO 1600, f/1.4 of the sky, and 1 to 2 minute exposures for the landscape, same other settings.
Question: where is this?
Roger
Preston, thanks for the NASA website info. Sounds like fun - I'll look into that.
Mark, I think I do see what you're seeing as far as the apparent disconnect between foreground and sky. I'm not sure what to do about it though. Darken the foreground further? Do more with the transition line? I think it's mainly due to what Harry mentioned, the fact that there's no real mid-ground. But let me know if you have ideas on helping that transition.
Roger, thanks for the "nits" - I'm always appreciative of those critiques. Good point (Harry as well) about the possibility for stars reflected in the pool. Question, though: wouldn't I get star trails with a 1-2 min exposure? Seems like the best thing would have been to blend in a high ISO exposure just for the pool. [clarification: I shot this as part of a 180 degree pano, with 7 high ISO exposures for the sky and 7 low ISO exposures for terrain. So unfortunately I don't have a high ISO terrain exp]. Another complication is that I had to clone out some unsightly growth from another plant/tree that covered much of the light reflected in the pool; don't know how easy it would have been to end up with clear stars in the pool. Still, good feedback and much appreciated.
The specific location is "semi-secret" from what I've gathered; I found it with some internet searching and confirmed with google maps. Out of respect for those who I know would not want the specific location revealed here I'll just repeat what I've heard others say in this kind of forum, that it's within the borders of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. I had a blast exploring the area during the day - kind of like an Easter egg hunt exploring the terrain and various holes. ;)
Harry, thanks for the good suggestions - I'll keep playing with possible refinements. I kinda liked how the rock on the right (and lines leading away from it) mimicked the form of the MW above, but your comments are very helpful and appreciated.
Masterful Jared.
Too many comments to read, so forgive any redundancy.
The transition from ground to sky looks too unnatural for my taste.
Fantastic elements in the comp.
I would rework the image to be darker overall and also darken the transition even more. Although not as flashy, the realistic feel may be inviting and less jarring.