Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Wintry Vixen
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Wintry Vixen

by Ashleigh Scully

Gallery: WildlifePosted August 18, 2014137 views11 comments
Hi -

A beautiful female Red Fox I photographed this winter in New Jersey.

Canon EIS 5D MIII
Canon 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Manual Exposure

ISO 1000 | f/6.3 | 1/800s

Minor sharpening of face/eye and some saturation adjustment. About 25% cropped off of top and bottom.

I am wondering if you find any of the branches in this shot distracting? I think a Red Fox in its winter coat should draw enough attention away from other distracting elements, but Im not sure what others think.

Thank you, Ashleigh

Comments

11 comments
Comment posted by Jim Zablotny on August 18, 2014 at 10:45 PM
Hi Ashleigh,

The branches in the foreground are a slight distraction, but my eye keeps looking at the sharp details of the fox's face. So, the distractions are minor and are part of what nature throws at us photographers. A good job on the processing with sharp details and softly lit, bright colors :wavey: ..............Jim
Registered on January 17, 2004, 705 Posts, 3594 Comments
Comment posted by John Launstein on August 19, 2014 at 3:13 AM
Hi Ashleigh! This is a BEAUTIFUL portrait of a good-looking fox. The overall colour palette is very pleasing, and the soft light is most complementary here. I think you composed this just about perfectly, though if it were mine I would consider cropping a bit more off the bottom. I know you likely wanted to leave room for the fox's virtual legs and a margin there as well, but the OOF foreground doesn't add anything for me personally. Regarding the foreground branches, I agree with Jim...I guess I would rather have a clear view without them present, but they don't distract significantly and this has so many qualities going for it that it's a very minor nit indeed. I can relate all too well to grasses where I don't want them...I live where the northern grasslands run straight into the Canadian Rockies and any subject smaller than a deer is going to have grass interfering with my attempts to get a clean image of it. :frown: In fact, yesterday Josiah and I managed to find a badger moving from the a higher elevation slope down toward the valley floor. Dozens of images between us over hundreds of yards worth of encounters and not a single frame without grass compromising the shot. Getting a view like you have here would have made our day to say the least!

Great image, and wonderfully processed as well.
Registered on April 5, 2011, 223 Posts, 1193 Comments
Comment posted by Ashleigh Scully on August 19, 2014 at 8:20 AM
Thank you for your nice comments this is really helpful.
Registered on November 4, 2013, 36 Posts, 210 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on August 19, 2014 at 10:20 PM
Interesting how much more contrast this animal has than the one I photographed in Nome. Beautiful shot Ashleigh, my eyes went straight to the sharp head and eyes of the fox so you are right in that it draws plenty of attention. After that my eyes wandered around the rest of the shot and the oof branches could be viewed as either a slight distraction but certainly not a big problem. Great job. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on August 20, 2014 at 9:41 AM
You did a nice job of isolating her from the busy surroundings. I appreciate the alert, away-from-the-lens stare.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on August 21, 2014 at 10:33 AM
Hi Ashley,

I like the intense stare of the vixen and she does stand out nicely from the background.

Two comments on the composition:

1. You ask: "...if you find any of the branches in this shot distracting?" If I'm being honest - yes. The ones that distract me (and, in my opinion, detract from the image) are the thicker reddish foreground branches/grasses that overlap the body of the fox. I totally get how hard it would be to get a clear shot of the fox (sans any distractions) in this terrain, but (even so), they still distract me.

2. This comment is personal opinion only and offered as a bit of "food for thought" - for me the crop is on the tight side. I personally find that when working with mammals getting to the "almost filling the frame when subject is broadside" point seems initially appealing to a photographer (a bit of the "closer is better" philosophy), but when you filling this much of the frame with the subject it is incredibly hard to do anything creative with the composition (other than just "show" - or document - the animal). I think giving solid consideration to "how much of the frame should my subject fill to meet my creative goals?" question is one of the most under-appreciated aspects of wildlife photography. In this instance I'd recommend either backing off significantly OR moving in much tighter (for a true portrait, for instance). I know that this can be real tough to do when working with prime lenses, but who said it was supposed to be easy? :wink:

Anyways...just my 2 cents worth...

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Ashleigh Scully on August 21, 2014 at 10:54 AM
Hi thank you everyone for your comments.

Brad, Im attaching another copy which is farther away and I think its better, showing more of the environment. I really like the darker green tree in the right top corner. Let me know if you like this one better, Ashleigh
Registered on November 4, 2013, 36 Posts, 210 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on August 21, 2014 at 11:06 AM
Hey Ashleigh,

Absolutely like the second one better - that's EXACTLY what I was getting it! And, even those this is kind of a "busy" scene, those "distracting" grasses or branches that were overlapping the body have really "faded away". And I agree with you about the darker green tree - provides a nice counter-balance to the subject. Well done.

When I'm out shooting (and not spending way too much time behind my computer! :wink: ) the first thing I think of when I encounter an animal is "how dominant should this subject be in the frame to convey what I'm feeling about this scene?" The "closer is better" attitude is one of the first things that a neophyte photographer who wants to get serious about their photography has to discard (note that I'm not saying getting close is always bad, but it certainly isn't always better than backing off and capturing more of the full scene).

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on August 21, 2014 at 12:24 PM
Ashleigh, thumbs up on the second version with more space!
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Ashleigh Scully on August 21, 2014 at 6:54 PM
Thank you Brad and Lon!
Registered on November 4, 2013, 36 Posts, 210 Comments
Comment posted by Jenaya Launstein on September 3, 2014 at 10:43 PM
What a beautiful vixen! I liked the original post, but I love the repost below! I really like the environment surrounding her. Great image, Ashleigh!
Registered on February 8, 2011, 254 Posts, 1302 Comments