Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Mohawk Falls +repost+repost
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Mohawk Falls +repost+repost

by Ed Lowe

Gallery: LandscapePosted October 16, 2014326 views18 comments
Nikon D700
Nikon 17-35 @ 19mm
f 18 @ 2 sec.
ISO 200
cable release & tripod
CPL filter
Ricketts Glen SP, PA

My intention was to cross over and shoot the falls from the other side and include some autumn foliage in the scene, but one half way across I gave it up because it was quite slippery. I was by myself and did not want to risk it. Anyway, this is what I came up with.

As always thanks for your thoughts.

Ed

Comments

18 comments
Comment posted by Bill Reid on October 16, 2014 at 1:16 PM
A very nice scene Ed with very nice fore ground details and color. Water flow looks very nice also. Probably something optical but it feels like it's tilting. Maybe just me. :cool: Very nice image.
Registered on January 27, 2013, 65 Posts, 2460 Comments
Comment posted by Preston Birdwell on October 16, 2014 at 4:22 PM
Nice composition, Ed. The color looks very nice, and I like the soft water. It appears to be tilted CW to me, as well. The Autumn color comes across nicely.

--P
Registered on November 1, 2003, 471 Posts, 5188 Comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on October 16, 2014 at 5:17 PM
Lovely mood Ed as well as image. I particularly like the water processing/treatment in this but the leaves add a lot of interest for me as well. I agree that there is at least an illusion of a tilt. Beautiful Fall image as posted.

pat
Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by D.A. Edwards on October 16, 2014 at 6:07 PM
Discretion is the better part of valor on the slippery slope :wink:
I like the comp and the SS for the water and the use of the naturally fallen autumn leaves. I could see a bit of a crop off the top to reduce the largest white sky spot. I agree with the perception that it is tilted CW. Nice work!
Registered on October 8, 2014, 226 Posts, 1187 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on October 16, 2014 at 6:41 PM
Thanks for your thoughts guys; always appreciated. Here is a repost with a two degree CCW rotation. I had thought about a rotation before posting but decided not to as I always use virtual horizon when composing. I guess I should have as it does appear that the scene is tilted. Let me know if this works any better for you.

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Preston Birdwell on October 16, 2014 at 7:18 PM
Ed, the repost looks better, but I think it could use a bit more CCW tilt--perhaps a 1 to 2 degrees more. I prefer the framing as-is.

--P

Registered on November 1, 2003, 471 Posts, 5188 Comments
Comment posted by Chet Dowell on October 16, 2014 at 10:18 PM
Very nice image of the falls in autumn. , Ed. I like the comp with the colorful foreground and the ss works well. Good job. Chet
Registered on December 3, 2012, 237 Posts, 1171 Comments
Comment posted by Catherine Reilly on October 16, 2014 at 10:41 PM
Wow, Ed, this is really pretty. Love the look of the falls; nice choice for shutter speed. Repost is way better but still looks tilted to me. Also might clone in the lower right corner as something looks blurred or out-of-focus there. I like this image a lot. Also think you were very wise not to complete the crossing being alone and all. This shot more than makes up for other shots lost.
Registered on August 16, 2006, 603 Posts, 9192 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on October 16, 2014 at 10:43 PM
Very nice color and composition. It makes me want to be there. The area above the falls looks relatively straight, but the falls are slanted so much that it makes me feel like I am falling to the right.
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by John&Patty Benway on October 17, 2014 at 4:20 AM
Love your low perspective Ed, and the colorful FG does a great job of leading the eye through the scene. Beautiful work .
John
Registered on May 12, 2006, 626 Posts, 8700 Comments
Comment posted by Riccardo Boesso on October 17, 2014 at 8:17 AM
Dear Ed,
I like the background (in the "corrected" version without tilt), I think you choose the right shutter speed to catch the water flow, I also like color treatment and the detail level.
Yet,there's something that doesn't win me over about the foreground: you decided to put in both the streams, that are directed toward the corners of the image and somehow they are "cut". In this way I think that the image looses something.
Perhaps, if you decided to include in the photo only one of them (the left one seems to be more interesting), the composition would have been stronger and more "incolving".
Obviously this is only my personal opinion.
Registered on October 15, 2014, 13 Posts, 72 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on October 17, 2014 at 10:56 AM
I thought I would try another repost with an additional two degrees CCW rotation and a little perspective control. I have to admit it does look better visually but, it looks a little weird to me as I remember the falls having some tilt. Something for me to check out and take note of the next time I visit. :smile:

Thanks again for your thoughts.

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Lowe on October 17, 2014 at 1:12 PM
lovely shot, Ed. I am 99.99% certain your first repost is the correct one. Both the falls and the foreground have a tilt to them. In some cases it's better to keep all your lines level even if in reality they're not, but I think this looks better with the actual tilt. I hate to be super nitpicky about such a nice shot, but one of my first thoughts was " I bet Ed left his polarizer in his other bag. But I see you used one. It's probably the glare from the open overcast sky that hindering the full effect. :toast: :toast:
Registered on February 11, 2004, 777 Posts, 5252 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on October 18, 2014 at 7:51 PM
Ed, I think this looks great and especially when looking at your large version! It is really an interesting view and works very nice for me. I think your first repost looks and feel right. I also think you choose a nice shutter speed for the water. Nice work! :smile:

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by John Williams on October 18, 2014 at 10:10 PM
I've never been there, but prefer the first repost Ed. Great fall color.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 221 Posts, 5985 Comments
Comment posted by Ryan Shain on October 19, 2014 at 10:27 AM
The first re-post is the winner for me Ed, and I enjoy exploring through the foreground leaves. The falls are beautifully captured with your choice for shutter speed. Very nice work!
Registered on February 20, 2007, 226 Posts, 4571 Comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on October 19, 2014 at 12:23 PM
Ed,

Another vote for the first repost.

pat
Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on October 19, 2014 at 2:49 PM
Ed, the NPN requirement of a perfectly flat horizon often leaves me scratching my head because there are so many instances (and it looks like this is one of them) where there's no reason for the horizon to be level. A prime example is a lake shore or stream bank that is angling away gently from the photographer...it should not be level. In this case, the way that seems best to level it is by looking at the bottom half of the falls. By then most of the water should be moving vertically. BTW, add me to the repost #1 = best crew.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments