Gallery: FloraPosted November 24, 201456 views10 comments
Some desert gold photographed adjacent to the dried up Amargosa River in the south end of Death Valley NP.
Canon T1i, f/18, 1/30 sec, ISO-200, 55mm, tripod.
All critiques welcomed.
Comments
10 comments
Comment posted by Ian Wolfenden on November 24, 2014 at 10:14 AM
I like the perspective and the wonderfully vivid setting for these flowers, though I find them slightly absorbed into the light mud ( maybe a touch more contrast ? ). A nice find and an eye catching image.
Registered on May 18, 2007, 1108 Posts, 7647 Comments
Comment posted by D.A. Edwards on November 24, 2014 at 2:27 PM
I see what you're saying so I messed around with it a bit Ian. Not sure it solves the problem or just makes the mud look muddier.
Registered on October 8, 2014, 226 Posts, 1187 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Wolfenden on November 24, 2014 at 4:25 PM
The flower-mud colours do seem to me to set each other off much better in the repost, Dave.
Registered on May 18, 2007, 1108 Posts, 7647 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Turner on November 24, 2014 at 4:56 PM
Sweet capture Da. I would prefer to see entire flower in bottom.
Registered on February 18, 2012, 534 Posts, 2755 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on November 24, 2014 at 6:45 PM
Dave: I like the original and repost. However with this comp I don't know if the subject is the flowers or the mud. If the flowers are to be emphasized I would crop this from the top to eliminate at least 50% of the mud above the flowers. Still uses the mud as a complementary element and gives the flowers more prominence. >=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by D.A. Edwards on November 24, 2014 at 7:10 PM
I am trying to remember my thought process on this from a few years ago. I do know that the plant was growing from a bank just below the section of dried mud, which ends right at the bottom edge. My plan was for flowers in front of dried mud as a comp and the bank just was not that attractive. I can see where that may not be working. Perhaps the tighter crop here might be the way to go.
Also I remember that I took a series of shots handheld here with a 35 pound backpack on as my spouse was "urging" me to get along on the way back to our truck. All the shots but this one therefore had too much camera shake. Even this one isn't terribly sharp.
Registered on October 8, 2014, 226 Posts, 1187 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on November 24, 2014 at 9:34 PM
This is one of those "damned if you do and damned if you don't" shots. For what it's worth, I like all three, not because of the composition but what the story tells about struggle and adversity.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on November 24, 2014 at 10:28 PM
My preference is for the first repost, Dave. Yes, the flowers feel a little cut off at the bottom, but I think this may largely be because the one flower blossom is cut off. I think the dried mud looks better in the repost. Overall, I think this is a fine image.
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Giuseppe Guadagno on November 30, 2014 at 1:35 PM
A floral image original and interesting for me. Thanks Dave.
Take care.
Registered on February 3, 2007, 827 Posts, 5052 Comments
Comment posted by Lucy Aron on April 3, 2015 at 1:21 PM
Interesting image with the contrast of dry mud and blossoms. Only nit is perhaps a little overly busy. Maybe a tighter crop might enhance focus more.
Registered on February 25, 2011, 189 Posts, 1160 Comments
Comments
10 commentsAlso I remember that I took a series of shots handheld here with a 35 pound backpack on as my spouse was "urging" me to get along on the way back to our truck.
Take care.