Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Tired Momma Redux (B&W)
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Tired Momma Redux (B&W)

by John Launstein

Gallery: WildlifePosted March 28, 2015120 views9 comments
Hi all! I posted this last year in colour, but always thought it might be interesting in B&W, so I thought I'd give it a go. I decided to go with a bit higher key conversion by brightening the darks and mids a bit.

While the original image does have vibrant colours and quite beautiful tones, this makes it something...different.

Interested in hearing your thoughts...please view the LARGER version if you have time!

Nikon D600
Nikkor AF-S 500mm f/4D IF-ED
ISO 800
1/800sec @ f/5.6
tripod mounted with legs flattened for lower angle of view
Cropped slightly to app. 85% of original

Adjustments to colour balance, brightness and contrast before conversion to B&W in Nik Silver Efex Pro 2, with additional tweaking to finish.

Comments

9 comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on March 28, 2015 at 9:18 AM
Interesting comparison between the two versions, John. In this one your high key processing really let her big yawn dominate the image. I think that works very well as it sets this view apart from the fine, but more conventional look of your earlier shot.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Kathy Barnhart on March 28, 2015 at 11:50 AM
This works so well as a black and white. It surprised me, but when I looked at the larger version, all the lines of the fox's fur and the grass blend together and your eyes are drawn to the gorgeous white teeth and tongue. Very nice.
Registered on November 11, 2011, 404 Posts, 1639 Comments
Comment posted by Stephen Kaluski on March 28, 2015 at 1:00 PM
Nice conversion John, with good detail & clarity. Good tonal range too.

TFS
Steve
Registered on March 25, 2007, 189 Posts, 1064 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on March 29, 2015 at 2:00 AM
Hi John!
It works very well in B&W!
If this was mine, I would consider unsharpening the grasses near the whiskers!
Jagdeep Rajput :wavey:
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by John Launstein on March 29, 2015 at 2:31 AM
Thanks for the comments, Mark, Kathy, Steve and Jagdeep! I'm so glad you like it as well. I have to be careful because I could probably happily have Nikon strip all the colour info out of my sensors (i.e. big, big fan of black and white). My wife tries her best to keep me balanced on colour vs B&W and is fairly successful at it (for now). :biggrin:

Jagdeep, I sent you an email but in case it doesn't go through to you, do you mean literally apply a blur to the grasses around the fox's face? The only part of the image that has had any sharpening applied is a very light round to the face itself (I masked it back off the whiskers as well as those always seem to get crunchy with any amount of sharpening whatsoever). Thanks for your suggestion in any event!
Registered on April 5, 2011, 223 Posts, 1193 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on March 30, 2015 at 1:16 AM
HI John!
I've replied your mail. I just meant to blur out the grass blades near whiskers.
Jagdeep Rajput
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on March 31, 2015 at 8:37 AM
Hey John,

I like the B&W treatment and processing here, but have to say that while I am just like everyone else and click away when an animal yawns, I usually don't end up really liking yawning photos (by that I mean I struggle with thinking what I'd ever do with them, aside from posting them here or working them in for humour in the occasional slideshow). At the end of the day I just don't find yawns aesthetically pleasing! But this is a real nice one! :wink:

I'm fine with the grasses near the snout - to me they add some visual interest. I think I'd like the shot even more if it was originally framed (or re-cropped, tho' I'm guessing you don't have the room) with less room on the left and more on the right. To me it feels a little (not a lot) like the fox's head is crowding the right side of the frame and consequently somewhat out of balance (to my eye).

I like B&W conversions (including the conversion process) myself...it can be very creative and engaging. But I am hoping Nikon DOESN'T strip out the colour info on future models - sometimes I kinda like colour too! :wink:

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on April 1, 2015 at 7:02 PM
John, I find this to be a pleasing conversion. In terms of comp, I feel the out of focus backline does not contribute detail, therefore if you have the space, more on our right and less left would be preferable. In fact, I tried looking at it as a vertical with the ears+angle of open mouth pointing to respective corners and felt that is the way it had the most impact. Regardless, this is fine as posted.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by John Launstein on April 7, 2015 at 12:17 AM

Thanks again, everyone! I agree--it looks better with a tighter crop from left, top and bottom. I noticed the same thing re working as a vertical, Lon! Thanks for the suggestion (and confirming my own sense!).

Registered on April 5, 2011, 223 Posts, 1193 Comments