Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Tricolored Portrait II
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Tricolored Portrait II

by John Launstein

Gallery: AvianPosted January 25, 2016123 views10 comments
Hi all! First off, yes, I know this is a pretty unorthodox crop/comp, but there are a few reasons for it!

I posted a different frame of this beautiful Tricolored Heron last year, but had only done a quick edit and had not really looked through my images in detail from this sequence. I was photographing an active GBH nest in the rain, and then the incredible light as the morning sun broke through the clouds when I heard something behind me. Being in alligtor waters, I turned around quickly to find this beautiful scene. I started out with the full-frame camera but quickly realized there was some real potential with either a TC or crop body, and opted for the latter. I could not believe the incredible backlighting and the colours it was producing as the mist burned off, but sadly my very best angle for background included a sapling of some sort encroaching into the frame. I decided to shoot anyway, and while I don't regret it, that stinking tree/branch has definitely caused me some consternation in post!

The heron is perched on the top of a broken-off dead palm tree. Any comp that includes its legs also includes the top of the branch to the left. I really wanted to process this without any cleaning/cloning, but in the end had to take out the top of the branch to have any comp that kept the mood and range of tones. I could have included the heron's feet as I cloned the tree away slightly past that point, but I liked the mood and power of a tighter crop into the heron's body as presented here. The only way this scene differs from the RAW file is the top of the branch has been removed from the elk area of my watermarked logo. Because I did end up retouching the file, I also removed three brighter OOF bugs/fluffs from the background, but left the other very OOF items because it enhanced the natural feel for me.

I intentionally went a bit darker than might be considered optimal or "normal" here as the heron was backlit and the scene was dark to my eye through the viewfinder. I think this retains the mood and feel of the moment.

I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on which of the two comps presented here works best for you. I know there are only subtle differences, so it may be that neither of them work for you as this is something a bit different in terms of bird placement and negative space. The primary difference is the original post retains the natural transition back to darker tones at the top of the frame, and the second crop comes in just a little tighter from the top and bottom.

Many, many thanks for your time and feedback on this one! Please do look at the detailed version for best quality.

EDIT: I've just posted a more traditional comp incorporating the feedback I received from this post. You can find the new, more full-view version here.

---------------------

Nikon D7100
Nikkor AF-S 500mm f/4D IF-ED
ISO 400
1/2000sec @ f/5
-1 stop underexposed from meter
Mounted on FEISOL CT-3372 Elite tripod with Acratech GV2 ballhead and Wimberley Sidekick
Cropped to app. 65% of original
Tree branch cloned from bottom left, three OOF bugs/fluffs cloned from background

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by John Launstein on January 25, 2016 at 7:16 AM
And here's the alternate version with just a shade more taken off the top and bottom. Thanks in advance for your input on this...I know there's not a lot of difference here.
Registered on April 5, 2011, 223 Posts, 1193 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on January 25, 2016 at 7:33 AM
The mood,colors and detail are all over the top. I understand completely why you really liked this one.  I would crop more off the top and let the viewer concentrate on the beautiful heron. Really nice capture you managed here.
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on January 25, 2016 at 8:54 AM
Hi John:

I much prefer the tighter version with less at the top.  Even with the tighter version, I'd look at pulling a bit more off the top.  Very nice light and concept.  Too bad about the legs and the stuff at the bottom.

 
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on January 25, 2016 at 11:49 AM
Another vote for the second version. By a considerable margin. The tighter crop removes the distracting brightness in the upper left and makes the bird a much stronger focus.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on January 25, 2016 at 1:14 PM
Hi John:  I'm afraid I'm one of those for which neither approach works really well.  With the legs chopped off, all that negative space at the top makes it feel like the bird is just improperly positioned in the frame.  I've played with it a bit and for my taste this works a lot better as a 4x5 with the same width you have now and just chopping the excess out of the negative space at the top.  I agree that the light and the colors of the bird and bg work very well together and this image is very much worth playing with until you get it just where you want it.  As an aside, sometimes I don't bother with crop proportion presets and just pull in corners and sides until it looks right-you might try that approach too.

devil
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on January 25, 2016 at 2:53 PM
I'll second the comments made by Dennis - the missing legs and placement of the heon so low in the corner with all that negative space just makes it look like an accidental composition.

Thre light and colors are wonderful, and I'd love to see a variation with the rest of the heron in the frame.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Sandor on January 25, 2016 at 6:32 PM
John: this is a beautiful and moody scene. I would crop even closer to the bird, but like it as is. Congrats! Richard
Registered on January 12, 2014, 453 Posts, 1625 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Thompson on January 26, 2016 at 2:03 PM
Hi John, the lighting and the detail in the heron are remarkable. From the two samplings you give, I for sure like the second one better. I certainly see where Richard and Dennis are basing their comments and also think you should keep experimenting with this. You have a real cool image here, you just have to figure out the strongest composition. enlightened
Registered on August 7, 2014, 125 Posts, 2319 Comments
Comment posted by John Launstein on January 26, 2016 at 8:23 PM
Many thanks for all the quality feedback and suggestions, everyone...greatly appreciated. While I apparently was feeling a bit artsy and rebelious and wanted to "break the rules" on this comp, I've incorporated your comments re the need for a more traditional comp and posted a new version here. Thanks again!
Registered on April 5, 2011, 223 Posts, 1193 Comments
Comment posted by David Rowe on January 27, 2016 at 4:58 AM
Hi John
For me this is indeed a masterwork with a fascinating air of serenity. Detail in the bird’s tricoloured attire is terrific! There is a lot of BG space above the bird’s head but this works well on account of the contrast produced by the brighter greenish area. I have a couple of nit picking suggestions concerning the BG and the bird’s head ‘tassels’ which may appear too bright to be true. I’d be tempted to use a curve to tone down the tassels. There are four or five BG ‘clone circles,’ the most noticeable one being in the light green area above the bird’s head. I’d be tempted to try cloning them out with soft reduced opacity brush.
David
 
Registered on December 20, 2013, 133 Posts, 286 Comments