Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
SWAN LAKE
‹ PreviousWeekly Challenge GalleryNext ›

SWAN LAKE

by Lucy VanSwearingen

Gallery: Weekly ChallengePosted July 14, 2016110 views6 comments
This breaks the rule, that light is best during the magic hours  And, that all blown highlights are bad...I took this in the middle of the day in bright sunlight.  But, I took it in RAW, so I was able to tone down most blown highlights preserve detail.  I am pleased with the dramatic reflection, that I was able to get at high noonsad

Comments

6 comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on July 14, 2016 at 7:59 AM
Lucy, the lighting here looks great.  I especially like the drama and textures in the water reflections.  I shoot with Canon 5D3 and 7D2 and they are very different in terms of how they handle "blown" highlights during raw processing, with the 5D3 allowing quite a bit of recovery and the 7D2 almost no recovery.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on July 14, 2016 at 8:26 AM
Striking image, Lucy. The swan has lovely form and the water makes a very nice background. Amazing what pp can do these days with raw files.
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Lucy VanSwearingen on July 14, 2016 at 5:31 PM
Oh yes, Scott....I actually have some taken of the last cygnet and Mom in a bit of shadow, that doesn't need much pp.   but lightroom and PSE are 2 of my best friends.sad

One question for you, Mark, and anyone else...I have a Canon 70D.  Right now, I use a canon zoom with a 1.5 x Kenko.   But, I need to get farther.  the Canon zoom to 400 is just too heavy for me to handhold.  I am interested in buying a used Sigma 150-500 (the new sigma to 600 HAS to have a tripod).  I've heard, that it's a great lens, but a bit on the fragile side.  What do you think?  And, since it's not supposed to last a lifetime, should I buy a new one instead of used?   I know, I should put this to the forum, but curious if you, two, have any ideas on this.

































 
Registered on May 23, 2009, 800 Posts, 2042 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on July 15, 2016 at 9:20 AM
Sorry, Lucy, I can't help with your lens question since >95% of my work is from a tripod where I leave the ball head somewhat loosened for "action" shots.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by David Schoen on July 15, 2016 at 4:46 PM
Lucy; the new Sigma  150 to 600 mm contemporary is not that fragile and how many times are you really going to drop your lens. First of all, it's very easy to handhold this lens and you do not need a tripod at all.  It only weighs 4 1/2 pounds. And yes, I've already dropped mine from 6 feet and it actually started working better. For what that's worth. It started focusing faster.
I think you can find a new Sigma contemporary for under $1000. The Sigma sport is heavier and more expensive and built a little stronger.  A real advantage of the new Sigma lenses is that you can change the firmware with your computer and this does make a difference. If you can afford it, I think you would be happy with the new lens rather than a used one.  By the way, your image does show really nice detail although the lighting is harsh.
Registered on November 6, 2006, 1213 Posts, 4587 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on July 20, 2016 at 6:42 PM
This did work well, Lucy.  The reflection is really neat and the dark water with the reflection of the swan and small bit of blue sets the swan off nicely.

devil
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments