Autumn Creek
by Jerry Marella
I haven't done much landscape photography, so please let me know what you all think of this effort. I was out along the creek and wanted to experiment with slow shutter. The idea was to blur the water and keep the rocks sharp up front and a little softer in back. My concerns are that it may be too busy, and I'm not sure about the green grasses that are at the edge of the frame. I cropped a little all around for comp and flow. I've always struggled with photos where there are a lot of elements, and I'd like to get better at this.
5D3, 24-205 @ 67, ISO 50, 3.2 sec @ f22, circular polarizer, tripod.
Thoughts, comments, and critiques are appreciated.
Comments
7 comments1) The appearance of water when slowed down is, within reason, a personal preference. Some people like a misty look and others less so. Generally I want it just slow enough to give a feel of water movement. The SS to use depends on how close you are to the subject vs how fast the water is moving. The goal is to show distinct whirls and swirls of water as it moves. In your case IMO the shutter speed is too slow.
2) The main subject is the water and rocks. The green grass on the side is much too bright to contribute to the composition and is a distraction. The same applies to a lesser degree to the green in the urc. However, the bright leaf on the rock adds to the image. It improves it. Usually anything coming in from the side of the frame is not desirable, but especially if it's bright. Objects coming in from the side work well when they act as a frame in the composition.
I am attaching an image that I took this summer showing the SS I prefer for the water effect. This image has issues as well but of a different nature. Others may feel differently.
Hope this is the sort of advice you were looking for.
Ed
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI.