Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Tennessee Wood Pecker
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Tennessee Wood Pecker

by Brian Murphy

Gallery: AvianPosted August 3, 2017128 views5 comments
I saw this bird in the trees in the afternoon. He would go between dark shade and light the sun was a bit harsh so I had to work on the highlights. Even though the sun was harsh I like the way the bird is spotlighted. 
Let me know how I can improve. I have a lot to learn.
Canon T5i
Sigma 150-600C @ 600
F8
1/250 shutter 
Iso 400

Thank you for looking.

Brian

Comments

5 comments
Comment posted by Shirley Freeman on August 4, 2017 at 1:26 PM
I don't know what to tell you, Brian.  I am certainly not a pro by any means, but will make a stab at it. First of all, I like his pose, and the leading line of the limb.  I like that you got the back of him, with a side profile of his head.  You are right, the light is a bit harsh, and I am sure that is affecting the colors.  I am thinking maybe if you desaturate a little, it might help.  I was hoping to look at a larger version, but when I pulled it up, it appears to be the same size, so I can't see how well the detail shows up, etc. I would suggest also that maybe if you can, put your subject a bit off center (rule of thirds I think would work nicely on this shot).  I love woodpeckers, but they are the hardest for me to get a good shot of, because they do just what you said, move around so that his is either in bright sun, or shade.  Maybe, if this is a tree that he frequents, and is where you can return to, you can catch him on a cloudy day, or sweet light in the morning or late afternoon, but cloudy would probably be best to avoid a lot of contrast between sunlight and shadows.  I hope that helps. 
Registered on May 27, 2017, 77 Posts, 844 Comments
Comment posted by David Schoen on August 4, 2017 at 6:42 PM
I think Shirley gave you some good advice.  The only thing I would add is that you probably could have benefited from slightly higher iso and a faster shutter speed.  Because you did not post a larger image I cannot judge the detail accurately but from what I see, it looks pretty good.

You should talk to a Canon owner who has the same model as you to find out what is the limit with respect to noise issues on iso for this camera.  I think that will help you in your decision-making process.  While it is easy to handhold the Sigma lens, you will always get a sharper image with a tripod.  You are going to have some issues at 1/250 of a second if you are handholding this lens at 600 mm.  It is also considerably sharper at 550 mm if you are shooting wide open.

The main issue would be the harsh light.  But as we know we can't always tell the birds when to come.  That said, I think this image has potential in postprocessing.
Registered on November 6, 2006, 1213 Posts, 4587 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on August 4, 2017 at 8:59 PM
Nice image Brian, sharpness looks good.  To my eye it looks a little bit on the yellow and oversaturated side so perhaps lowering the white balance a little would help.  A small crop from the right and top would move the woodpecker out of the center.  If you have more space on the left you might include it as well.  All that said, I think it's a good effort considering the situation.  devil
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Allen Brooks on August 5, 2017 at 11:49 PM
Is this a local name for a red-bellied woodpecker?  I would agree with decreasing the yellow, as, at least in the books I looked at, the face isn't this yellow.  You might crop this so there is more room in front of the bird than behind it.  You might also try decreasing the background highlights and increasing the shadow detail around the bird.  I like the pose with the slight head turn and the angled perch.
Registered on July 27, 2011, 262 Posts, 2597 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on August 6, 2017 at 6:55 PM
I'm still not sure why you're not getting the larger image, Brian.  From what you sent me off-line, it seems as if you should.  At this scale the detail looks pretty good.  The light is pretty intense throughout the image with lots of competing primary colors, but there isn't much you can do in that situation.  I think this would work better cropped to a vertical format and eliminating the in-focus bright leaves entering the middle of the frame on the right.
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments