Posted by Randy Beacham on October 17, 2006 at 1:49 AM
I don't quite get the royalty free term, since from what I read they are simply displaying the images, not selling them. Is there something I'm missing? Randy
Posted by David Prichard on October 18, 2006 at 11:06 AM
Randy,
Should a photographers work be selected Adobe has the right to use that image for promotion without paying the photographer a fee. The good news is that perhaps the photographer can use the new found fame to sell the image(s) to other markets as it is a non-exclusive deal.
Dave
Posted by Kent Staubus on October 20, 2006 at 8:26 PM
Oh boy--exposure. That one's been around for quite some time now.
Kent in SD
Posted by Dan Truong on February 20, 2007 at 2:50 PM
FYI,
Adobe just sent an email, you can now buy Adobe Lightroom for $199 instead of $299.
Personally I tried the beta and I liked it. Easier to use than PS to do quick photo adjustments, yet pretty powerful. I like the B&W conversion engine on it. I'm not trying to start a debate though.
Discussion
4 repliesOf course it is royalty free, but at least non-exclusive.
http://direct.adobe.com/v?xJHvvqPEccPJnqWvW
Dave
Should a photographers work be selected Adobe has the right to use that image for promotion without paying the photographer a fee. The good news is that perhaps the photographer can use the new found fame to sell the image(s) to other markets as it is a non-exclusive deal.
Dave
Kent in SD
Adobe just sent an email, you can now buy Adobe Lightroom for $199 instead of $299.
LightRoom
Personally I tried the beta and I liked it. Easier to use than PS to do quick photo adjustments, yet pretty powerful. I like the B&W conversion engine on it. I'm not trying to start a debate though.