Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Forums · Digital Imaging

Quality Of Fuji Paper

Discussion

6 replies
Posted by Alice Scoggins on November 2, 2006 at 5:27 PM
I rarely have large prints made, but recently ordered a couple from PhotoWorks.com. I'm very pleased with the prints, and they were inexpensive. They are printed on Fujicolor Crystal Archive paper. Is that a good quality paper? I'm wondering since I intend to give the framed prints as gifts, and I may want to sell a print every now and then.
Posted by Guy Tal on November 2, 2006 at 7:28 PM
Yes, it's considered the top paper for traditional (i.e. non inkjet) color prints. I think Kodak may argue with that but too bad for them :smile:

Guy
Posted by Hank Pennington on November 2, 2006 at 10:44 PM
Fuji Crystal Archive has been our choice for many years for conventional photo prints from our studio--- To the point that we changed labs when our pro lab quit using it for a while. I agree with Guy on the value of Kodak's opinion! :rolleyes:
Posted by Guy Tal on November 3, 2006 at 9:11 AM
Also note that Crystal Archive comes in 3 surface type. The matte version is my personal favorite and also seems the most popular among buyers, at least for landscape images.

Guy
Posted by Michael E. Gordon on November 3, 2006 at 11:40 AM
Adding to Guy's post above, I've noticed at my local Costco that they have a cheezier consumer version of Fuji Crystal Archive matte paper, which looks more like a "luster" (it's more glossy and pebbly than professional Fuji CA; Costco calls it "luster"). The paper is marked by Fuji as CA, but it is definitely not identical. I have yet to raise the question with Fuji or Costco.
Posted by Alice Scoggins on November 3, 2006 at 1:13 PM
That may be what I'm getting in these prints. A 16 X 20 print cost me $17.95. I'm very pleased with the prints, and since I usually just use them for me, or gifts, I can't see spending lots of $. So cheesier paper or not, I'm still pleased. Any idea how I could find out for sure, for curiosity's sake?
Posted by Michael E. Gordon on November 3, 2006 at 2:06 PM
You could ask the lab who did your printing, Alice. I suspect that the paper I speak of is formulated to withstand much more handling than the pro paper should be subject to. There is a distinct difference between Fuji CA matte which is very smooth and low gloss, and this more consumer oriented version which is clearly more pebbly and glossy (and overall feels more plastic-ky).